Trump wants to meet Kim. atomic game returns to the table

dzienniknarodowy.pl 3 weeks ago
Zdjęcie: Trump chce spotkania z Kimem. Nuklearna gra wraca na stół


Donald Trump announced on August 19 that he would meet Kim Jong Un in 2026, and North Korea described as a state with 57 "very powerful" heads. After reducing the U.S. exercise with South Korea is simply a clear signal: Washington again trades ally safety for individual diplomacy.

The White home announcement

Donald Trump confirmed that he planned to meet Kim Jong Un inactive in 2026. How It Reported Euronews, the president of the United States told reporters that he knew the leader of North Korea well and that the relation with him was an asset. In the same speech, he gave the number 57 North Korean atomic warheads. It's a uncommon precision in the mouth of an American president.

No date or gathering place specified. According to media coverage, a deadline is being considered later this year, possibly on Trump's journey to Asia. However, the very fact of the announcement is applicable now. North Korea is getting a signal that Washington is again ready to shift the burden of talks from tough alliance structures to individual contact between 2 leaders.

57 heads and hard reality

The number provided by Trump is not detached from public expert estimates. SIPRI in June 2026 estimated that North Korea could have folded about 60 heads and has fissile material for at least 30 more. We're not talking about an exotic problem from the another end of the world. North Korea is developing rockets, expanding arsenals and increasingly operating in the shadow of the Russian war in Ukraine.

Trump talks about the conversation, but the conversation takes place after the balance of power has shifted. Kim doesn't come to the table as a weaker partner asking for relief. He comes as a leader of a government that has been buying time for years, investigating rockets and building atomic deterrence. The American president might call it a chance. The U.S. allies gotta ask what's left of that chance in their real defence plans.

Exercises as a bargaining chip

The announcement of the gathering came after the decision to limit US and South Korea military exercises. AP informedThat the Pentagon was expected to reduce the scale of Ulchi Freedom Shield maneuvers, and Pjongjang inactive considered this change inadequate. This is simply a typical logic of the regime: concessions are accepted, force is maintained, and yet demands more.

This is not an academic debate for Seoul. Exercises are 1 of the pillars of deterrence and checking military readiness. For Washington they may be at political expense or part of a negotiation game. This is where you see Trump's fundamental policy problem: a individual conversation with the dictator can bring spectacular staff, but it can besides weaken ally's assurance in American predictability.

DN has already written about the tensions it raises Donald Trump's policy towards South Korea. Now this dispute is coming back in a sharper form. If defensive exercises become a token in a game with Pyongyang, all U.S. ally should watch carefully whether a akin mechanics will someday appear in his own region.

Lesson for Poland

Poland is not on the Yellow Sea, but the logic of the large policy is the same. A country that gives its own safety in individual else's hands must number on the fact that another's capital has its interests, its choices and its campaigns. Alliances are needed. But they are not a substitute for their own strength.

Therefore, from a Polish position Trump's announcement should be read without naivety. DN has already indicated that Donald Trump's administration policy can bring tensions besides in transatlantic relations. It's good erstwhile a U.S. leader can talk to an opponent. Bad erstwhile the price of the conversation is paid by the credibility of the exercises, military presence and safety of allies. A nation that wants to last in a hard planet cannot live solely by promising that individual far beyond the ocean will always make the right decision.

Source: Polish Radio Rzeszów/IAR, Euronews, AP, SIPRI

Source: Polish Radio Rzeszów

Read Entire Article