1. During planet War II, about 250 1000 to 300 1000 Ukrainians served in German armed and police formations. Leader of 1 of the most extremist Polish nationalist organizations, Jan Mosdorf was murdered in Auschwitz by the Germans. Like the immense number of Polish nationalists.
Ukrainians and Nazis collaborated, Poles died at the hands of the Nazis.
The chief ideologist OUN Dmytro Doncow was the origin of tribal chauvinism – father-founder of Polish nationalism Roman Dmowski was a politician faithful to Christian tradition.
That's the story. Much more accurate than the dogma “let’s leave past to historians” seems to Felix Koneczny’s opinion that past does not explain the past, but tells why it is now the way it is.
Poles stretched out their hands to the attacked nation, gave immense military assistance – the Ukrainian government praises UPA murderers and ostensibly disregards Poland in global talks.
And Polish “cool, smiling”? They see the threat of Ukrainians through “Polish fascism” due to the fact that any guy aggressively spoke to a girl in any Polish city.
“Xenophobia”? Or possibly polonophobia, irrational aversion towards the nation next to which 1 lives, caricaturization of his wines, while being blind to the faults of nations doing harm to Poles?
“Rasism”? Or possibly reverse racism – treating Ukrainian safety as something more crucial than the dignity of Poles, seeing force due to nationality as something more reprehensible than "normal" violence?
Don't be indifferent! Do not be indifferent as those who for decades have silenced the Volyn massacre, and now undermine the opinion of Poland, attributing to the Polish nation the qualities created by their phobias
2. Do people engage in social and political life due to the fact that they “want to influence the future of Poland” due to the fact that “they are at the heart of society”? Most people will say that. Or are they truly after themselves and their halo, their self-presentation in the glory of a “good man”? About the “romanticism of themselves”, environmental prestige?
Those who stand up for it have any benefit? Or do they have as much as a dog that calls it a dog, or better feeling of the owner?
Maybe this “romanticism of itself” prevents them from geopolitical analyses (although they would bring Ukraine closer to Germany), rationality, cognition (for example, from reading Zbigniew Parafianovich's book on Volodymyr Zelenski) and orders them to search “xenophobia” and “racism” with the care and zeal of the “enemies of the people”?
4. “Faith” is the most appropriate word for mainstream liberal worldview. The political election of his representatives is simply a confession of faith. utilizing logic to explain pirouets (yet more than a decade ago the enemy was “rusophobia”, now the enemy is “ruskie onuce”) makes no sense.
“Faith” fits more with mainstream representatives than with Catholics. Catholic is certain that God exists – liberal (so liberal) BELIEVES in a planet without nations. The creation of specified a planet is impossible, so what is left?
National nihilism and fighting against what it calls "real patriotism", portrayed specified and personified by a half-wit in a tracksuit or "janus" beating his wife after Sunday Mass. Without proposing any patriotism that would disagree from the pan-European ideology. This is not only a measurement of their eradication, but besides of their inability to adopt rational categories in political thinking
5. The liberal language of mainstream is aesthetically – moralistic, unreasonable (full of terms specified as “disgusting”, parsing that “it is simply a shame to have specified views”),
Reason replaces dogma ("Ukraine fights for us").
The imagination of the planet is manichean – absolute good has no right to be judged and criticized, so anyone who adopts akin rating categories, as in the case of absolute evil is simply a "symmetrist" (a good curtain of stigmatization by a language embedded in moral terms).
Obsessions, phobias, all fears and worldly dogmas of those who would like to see their habitat in the religion and another Poles already scope the beginning of the 3rd Polish Republic.
The chief "moral authority" Adam Michnik considered that in a country infected by the post-communist nomenclature the primary opponent is the "dark garden", that is, in fact Catholics and any Poles.
It is simply a fresh left without its proletariat, which, incapable to find it, focuses on educating the nation from superior positions.
Denying romanticism is his caricature. In fact, he does not criticize the immaturity of the cult of “death for Homeland” but of Poles. Polak stupid, due to the fact that “Poland is Christ of the nations”, but besides “Polak mean, due to the fact that xenophobia”.
Or possibly individual more conscious will come to the conclusion that it was not religion that created irrationality, but that it is in human nature and that all despotic or totalitarian systems are utilized by democratic politicians? That they all form quasi-religions? That specified quasi-religion is what the mainstream believes. Quasi – a religion so unique that it contains religion in itself
Jacek Tomczak
