It seems that in Law and Justice they did not agree on 1 version of the studio in Gdańsk, which was acquired by their presidential candidate. After a series of disfellowshipping statements by Karol Nawrocki and statements by politicians from Nowogrodzka, there is so much to be confused about.
But from the beginning. At first there were voices that Nawrocki took over from Mr. Jerzy about 30-metre-long flat in the Gdańsk settlement of Siedlce by way of a donation agreement or life imprisonment – in exchange for caring for about 80-year-old men. "Since the flat became formally owned by Karol Nawrocki, he continued to aid Mr.Jerzem, regularly paying bills, shopping, buying medicines, etc."
Then it turned out that the head of IPN had become the owner of the flat under a sales agreement. And there was an even bigger avalanche.
What is known about Nawrocki's studio in Gdańsk? The PiS is lost in testimony
Two things in the alleged housing scandal of Nawrock are peculiarly controversial. First – settlement between Charles and Marta Nawrocki and Jerzy Zz. The flat was to be sold to the PiS candidate and his wife for PLN 120 thousand.
This information is in the notarial act. And he spoke about it on Tuesday, May 6th Przemysław Czarnek at a press conference of the Law and Justice (about the tyranny of the erstwhile Minister of Education in the following part of the article).
– In 2017, the final sales agreement and notarial act of March 6, 2017 is besides included in the perpetual books, which uncover the transfer of ownership of the premises in the mode of sale for PLN 120 thousand. There is no donation in any authoritative document, there is no commitment to care and there is no mention that the flat is acquired due to taking care of Mr Jerzy," said Mr PiS.
Czarnek besides accused the media of lying, slandering Nawrocki that he was expected to aid a sick man, and he did not, and acting on a pot of peculiar services.
The PiS MP besides quoted a fragment of the 2012 notarial act, under which the conditions for the future sale of the flat were established: "Paragraph three: Karol and Marta, Nawrocci's spouses, declare that they paid to Jerzy Z. the full selling price of PLN 120 thousand, which Jerzy Z. confirms".
Only a fewer twelve minutes later Karol Nawrocki in Bogdan Rymanowski's YouTube show said something completely different. He said he'd been handing over the money to Mr. George in... a twelve years.
– The transfer of the full sum of 120 1000 then to Mr.Jerzemu Z. would then be a threat to his life and health," he said. How'd he get that information? The PiS candidate didn't uncover it.
As Nawrocki stated, he acquired the flat legally, "by handing over to Mr.Jerzem, in accordance with the purchase-sale agreement, circumstantial funds over 14 years." "This is the years 2011-2025," he added.
And he added that he transferred PLN 20 1000 to Jerzy Z. There were any notarial charges, counselors. That's not precisely what I'm going to say, he said. This, of course, was regulated by Mr Jerzy. There was an option to buy out this apartment, for which Mr Jerzy needed funds. I gave him these funds," he added.
But his words contradict what is written in the notarial act.
As if it were not enough, as determined by the three-city "Gazeta Wyborcza": "It was Karol Nawrocki who organized the buyout of the elder apartment. He was with cash at the bank, though he gave a different version".
"On Friday, October 21, 2011, a typical of Gdańsk signed a notarial agreement with Jerzy Z. and this 1 became the owner of the apartment. The process was piloted by Nawrocki, although in an interview with Rymanowski he reduced his role" – we read in "GW".
And then, "'Election' has evidence that Nawrocki brought cash to the Gdańsk branch of Bank Millennium on Thursday, October 20, 2011 and ordered a transfer on his behalf for PLN 12,603 and 15 cents. The recipient was the Municipal Office in Gdańsk. Nawrocki gave the cashier the title of the transfer – 'buying the premises [here address] Mr. Jerzy [name]', handed over a file of banknotes and signed clearly under the order. He made the transaction at 12.44 p.m. This is simply a item that is not worth remembering, but a visit to a bank with cash is hard to forget".
That put even more gas in the fire.
NRA chief on the Nawrock affair: A case for the prosecution
The first question is: did Karol Nawrocki lie to the notary and the notary confirmed the truth?
– It all depends on the context. From a legal point of view, this paper does not in itself embody a message of untruth, but consists of a series of actions which rise reasonable doubts about the matter. And they mostly make us ask whether we are dealing with a suspected fraud," says Przemysław Rosati, head of the ultimate Bar Council.
He adds that "notarial statements are 1 of the many elements that are applicable in this matter".
– delight pay attention to the state of wellness and to the alternatively hard material situation of Mr Jerzy, to the usage of the discount (90 percent – ed.), to the conclusion of a preliminary agreement which in these circumstances protected Mr Nawrocki's interests, in order to guarantee that on the 1 hand the period in which the sale of the flat could not be made, due to the fact that then the bonus should be returned, on the another hand, that after that date Mr Nawrocki could get the property of the apartment. This activity was clearly secured by Mr Nawrocki, the head of the Polish bar.
He adds: "In the end, we have a crucial gap between whether 120 1000 zlotys were paid once, as would consequence from a notarial act, or in instalments, and whether they were paid at all, due to the fact that so far this fact is not settled. I believe that in the name of the rule of equality of all before the law, this substance should be clarified by the prosecution. An investigation should be initiated to verify whether we are dealing with a suspected fraud, a crime in Article 286 of the Criminal Code.
Counselor Rosati emphasizes that it is not so much a possible message of untruth in a notarial act that is simply a problem.
– The problem is the series of events, the usage of legal instruments to make the flat in Gdańsk's municipal resources yet become the property of the presidential candidate and the president of IPN. And this road that leads us through this story, various legal instruments, absolutely unobtrusive statements coming from the candidate himself – for all common sense, average observer it is apparent that there are many things that request to be explained – the NRA president believes.
Two points would so be crucial in clarifying this matter: to show that individual has been misled or to prove that they have been utilized to stay wrong, as well as – besides very crucial – the evidence of Mr Jerzy. However, this may be hard due to the condition of the man.
– However, the Public Prosecutor's Office has instruments to reconstruct the state of wellness from the date of the act and to collide it with criminal and civilian law rules in order to verify whether these activities are crucial at all, whether they could be crucial in view of the state of health, the hard situation of Mr Jerzy, as well as the financial relation which is in this case between Mr Jerzy and Mr Nawrocki. It is essential to find whether all of this has not been carried out in order to make Mr Nawrocki the sole owner of this flat – the patron tells us.
Czarnek informed all Poland about the last will of Mr Jerzy
There is another substance that besides gives emergence to large emotions: can anyone go outside the camera and uncover "without any mode" of someone's will? In the life of the man who wrote it down? At the Tuesday press conference of PiS, Przemysław Czarnek, 1 of those PiS politicians who defends Karol Nawrocki about the studio in Gdańsk, did so. In addition, the erstwhile Minister of Education reported that Mr Jerzy had disinherited his household and the flat was handed over to the head of the IPN.
– It is to be assumed that there is no anticipation that Mr. George's consent to the release of the contents of the will is made aware. It is so a violation of the right to privacy, a violation of individual property, both of Mr George and of his loved ones, who have been pointed out in the will as disinherited. The full Poland has learned what Mr. Jerzy's last will is, with this information entering into the constitutionally protected right to privacy – there is no uncertainty the patron.
– There are boundaries and they have been crossed. There should be no area for tolerance. It is besides very disgusting that politicians, in order to save the situation, scope for specified instruments and do not care that the right to privacy is protected and cannot be so freely held by this right, especially erstwhile you are not a individual who has the right to inform about specified matters – you do not bite the head of the NRA.
In this context, the prosecution can besides take action.
– If Mr George's condition present does not let him to take up his own defence of his rights, then yes – there is simply a field of action for investigators. delight remember that the prosecution is besides the guardian of the regulation of law, including those who have been harmed," emphasized Rosati.
Nawrocki wants to donate the condo. But can he do it?
There's more controversy in the case. According to Onetu's findings, Karol Nawrocki and his wife Marta took over the studio in Gdańsk, making a deal... with themselves. The transaction took place without Mr. George's involvement. On the 1 hand, the Nawrocks performed as a man's attorney, on the another hand as a buyer. We wrote more about it here.
On Wednesday, May 7, Nawrocki responded to a media storm and announced that the flat in Gdańsk would be donated to charity. – Yesterday I made a decision to transfer this flat to charity, 1 of the charities that will proceed to carry out this mission that I did towards George. So this flat will service in the following years, decades, the elderly," he said during a message to the media.
– In the donation agreement with the charity we are already in contact with, there will be a clear evidence that Mr Jerzy, whom I want long life and health, can usage this flat until his death," he added. He didn't answer the press' questions.
Except there might be a problem with the transfer of the flat to charity.
"Mr. Nawrocki cannot spare the apartment, for it is not his. If he made a false message about paying the price, then the deal is off. It will depend on the court whether the flat goes to Mr. George or the municipality. All donations are now just mating," Roman Gierty wrote on the X website.
