That's what Krystyna Pavlowicz is going to get erstwhile he retires. Amount shall be reduced

natemat.pl 6 hours ago
One of the most controversial judges of the Constitutional Court, Krystyna Pavlowicz, will go to "retired state". That means her earnings will drop by a quarter. It's inactive the sum the average Pole has to work for... a fewer months. Pavlovich besides receives a pension. Here's how much he'll charge from the Treasury.


The state of remainder in December Krystyna Pawłowicz means a kind of judicial retirement. Krystyna Pawłowicz will receive 75 percent of her erstwhile wage from now on. It's inactive a powerful amount.

The average Pole works for this amount for 5 months


In the Constitutional Tribunal Krystyna Pawłowicz earns PLN 40 1000 gross per month. With a average period, that's about 28 grand per hand.

Losing her earnings by a 4th won't affect her possession. all period it will receive approx. 30 1000 PLN gross, which in average terms corresponds to about 20 1000 PLN per hand. It's a sum that lets you live rather comfortably.

But it will not be the only origin of support for Krystyna Pavlowicz. She is besides a pensioner, and as calculated by "Fact" she can receive more than 10 1000 gross pensions, which is over PLN 8,000 net. Thus, the transition to a state of remainder should not disturb her financial situation, due to the fact that in full she will get PLN 28 1000 per month.

As we wrote yesterday in naTemat.pl, the median earnings in Poland are about PLN 5 1000 per hand. The average Pole would gotta work for this amount over 5 months.

Interestingly, Krystyna Pawłowicz's property message was regularly classified by the erstwhile TK president, Julia Przyłębska. The state of possession of Pavlovich is so unknown.

The Court's finances are besides highly interesting. In the course of work on the budget bill, the appropriations for the remuneration of the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal were reduced to zero. The institution should not so have money to pay, but unofficially it is known that payments to judges go from savings.

Read Entire Article