Krzysztof Bosak. Speech in the Sejm on August 17.
– We have come to discuss the resolution prepared by the Law and Justice on the referendum. Let's start with the fact that as a Confederate, we support the referendum. Referenda as an examination of the real opinion of citizens about what line of governance the government should adopt, what model of policy it should implement.
For 8 years, the Law and Justice Government, with many of these strategical choices to choose from, whether in European, migration, energy, industrial, transport policies, did not erstwhile want to usage this instrument.
– So it is clear to us that this is what We are dealing with an effort to polarize society during the election run and impose topics that sociologists, working for the Law and Justice Service, found convenient. Whether these sociologists correctly predicted whether they might be incorrect again – as they had already been incorrect in the last election, where, according to the sociologists working for the Law and Justice, the Confederacy was not expected to enter [the Sejm], you failed – we will see.
In my opinion, these questions are clearly formulated in a clever, seemingly clever, perverse way and so yet – society is wise, it will announcement your perverseness – you will lose it.
– On the another hand, the hysteria that accompanies the opposition here, which itself called itself a total, or centreleft, is already hard to hear. Truly, making a referendum, even with stupid questions, is not the end of democracy. Don't exaggerate, you're embarrassing yourselves in the eyes of society. And you're not the 3rd way you want to be. You're either becoming a radical, destabilizing state, a left or an entree of the civilian Coalition.
This is where the Confederacy represents common sense. Here, the Confederates present coldness in this situation and the Confederates have been presenting, from the outset, as the first formation, reasonable questions to be asked. Firstly, by responding to your proposal only to the European Union's relocation policy, we said that this should be extended to the migration policy that the government is conducting. due to the fact that you You have a de facto pro-immigration policy. You grant all possible financial benefits to all foreigners who legally come here from all over the world. and 4/5 of society does not support your policy, and you are afraid to ask.
– So our first proposal: Do you support the payment of social benefits to immigrants? Don't be afraid to ask. At least you'll hear he's not. And you will proceed to give money to anyone who comes here from Asia, from Africa, wherever you want.
Our second proposal: Do you support the valorisation of the 500+ to 800+ benefit? Poles have already experienced your benefits of expanding the wellness and anti-Polish Deal. Don't be afraid to ask.
Third proposal: Do you support limiting the usage of cash?Which you've pasted to the covid recipes.
And 4th question: Do you support the ban on registration of fuel cars since 2035? due to the fact that you want to finish average motorization and Poles don't support it!
