"Stalinism Reconstruction Group" and its Residential Candidate, Rafał Trzaskowski

Author: BlackLimozine , April 9, 2025

The word “Stalinism Reconstructive Group” was coined by Łukasz Warzech referring to the activities mentioned above by describing Bodnar's latest instructions on the usage of recently renovated – sharpened and polished panic tools.

Terror of Hate

The word Warzecha is correct due to association with the period of Stalinism during which the communist panic of hatred consisted of punishing for spoken words and imaginary cooperation with the enemies of socialist democracy.

A slight paraphrase from Comrade Stalin may aid us to realize the analogy, who rightly noted that As Euro-communism progresses, the class conflict is intensifying. The tightening of the fight requires the neocomuna to usage sharper tools.

Why do we call them neocommun? due to the fact that they don't do it lightly or even more crazy in the empty heads of postmodernists, who just request to have fun ruining the language and contaminating culture with their own waste. This is done by a hateful leftist, who decided to join the penal code with a freshly tightened, long-used "repressive tolerance" by judaic neo-marksist Marcus.

Neokomuna is possessed by hatred of average people, who frequently talk the fact about perverts, thieves, degenerates molesting children, Negroes and Arabs, and yet about Jews or Ukrainians. The hated neo-commun yet decided to vent its hatred by creating rules that would let more severe repression.

The devil's print

The father of lies has long left his mark in documents, rulings and laws. Prof. Bogusław Wolniewicz described the quintessence of this phenomenon:

The fact is to be subject to the avatar of "decentness," he commands it. The Polish Constitutional Court announced in December 2006 with the mouth of its President, justice Jerzy Stępnia, this amazing novelty: “We in our judgments said that the highest value was dignity, not truth. [...] The fact is not the highest value in our constitutional order.”

In the explanation of the president of the Constitutional Tribunal, the fresh rule was expressed: the rule of "humanist" truthfulness. As you can see, it sounds like this: (H) The fact should be spoken unless it serves human dignity. So erstwhile it does not serve, it is allowed to talk untruth, or suppress the truth—at your discretion. “The concept of lying and the rule of truthfulness” Prof. Bogusław Wolniewicz

So we have a procedure. replacing the Truth another terms filled with sawdust – Appearance values supported by a fresh belief in Man: ...the highest value is dignity, not truth.

I wrote appearances due to the fact that “decent” and another “awataries” are based on memanology related to the leftist ideology, which takes advantage of the well-being of dysfunctional people who profess the notabenes of the religion of the neo-Marxist ideology. It is known that what the Left proclaims has nothing to do with truth, reason, logic. Hence this dethronement of truth, which the expected concern for man sends, His right to do evil.

Hate for Truth

Nothing harms totalitarian ideology like truthful people hitting the dignity of a liar and the dignity of any another degenerate. Hence the request to defend the well-being of fascists and another polytruds. It is besides crucial that the devil's perverts are called “the speech of hatred”.

The return of a whore and a snitch for a public term

Due to the “acceleration of class struggle” of the “fighting democracy” staff, they are likely to increase the number of posts for activists. The classical blunt polytrud, agent and sponsored expert will be joined by the essential whore and snitch in specified cases.

Now effort protesting the parade of equality, holding a banner in your hand, e.g. “Get out of LGBT ideology”. And if the prosecutor decides that you have “an intolerant view at all”, you are lying. #GRS – Stalinist Reconstruction Group

Only now, at the very end, will he mention to the title candidate for resident, Trzaskowski. It's kind of golem – a being made of ideological clay in the form of a man, and judging by his statements deprived of the soul of reason, conscience and ability to talk truth.