The question of the origin of Sikorski's wife should never fall

It's all over the news. any defended Sikorski's attitude, others wrote and said that any question could be asked. I don't think so. Can you imagine a writer asking, for example, “Do you like oral sex?” Or, “Do you like to beat your wife/husband?” There are plenty of questions that should not be asked in decent journalism (I besides urge journalists to read Sally Adams and Wynfroda Hicks's book Journalism Interview). Unless individual is doing tabloid journalism, gossip, cliques, etc., but let's not call it serious, qualitative journalism. Monica Olejnik was incorrect about each other.

So what's all this ruckus about? In the “Dot over i”, Olejnik asked Sikorski: “In the “Common Week” I read that for the members of the KO the problem is the origin of your wife (Anne Applebaum – M.P.). What would you say to the author of „The Weekly of the Common” to this?” Sikorski: “I would say that there is already a secular tradition that the first ladies should be judaic people.” The oilman thanked, Sikorski stood up and left without saying a word. It is embarrassing that the Oilman quoted as ‘The Common Weekbook’ in which there was no specified article! She did not do her investigation or was misled by her researcher/researcher. Whatever. If she decided to ask specified a delicate question, she should have checked. Secondly, the article that Olejnik referred to was written by Piotr Śmilowicz for Gazeta.pl. The text contains reservations allegedly expressed by members of the Civic Coalition that Sikorski, after winning Trump, has little chance of moving for president due to his wife who compared Trump to Hitler and Stalin (to be exact: she compared the rhetoric of his speeches). The most crucial was 1 sentence: “Besides the fact that you can hear it completely on the off-off in KO, in our society Applebaum is not a good recommendation.” In both cases (Smiłowicza and Olejnik) we have a mention to the expression “in KO is spoken”, “on the off in KO”. Who speaks, why says, or truly speaks – we do not know. All we know is that this is gossip journalism, consecutive from the magla, ridiculous, tabloid. I hatred this kind of journalism due to the fact that everyone can say and compose unpunishedly what spit on his tongue will bring, and verification is not possible due to the fact that it was anonymously, "off the record". What if it was a alleged hostile leak to harm the competitor and journalists were seduced and exploited?! By the way, the origin of the wife of the candidate for president of the Republic of Poland does not interest me. I'm curious in his views and imagination of the presidency. End of story.

Monika Olejnik, however, found defenders among journalists. In “Gazeta Wyborcza”, Marek Markowski claims that Olejnik reported “any political reality—she asked whether the view circulating in the organization of her interlocutor”. Markowski took for granted a pure presumption, a rumor, no 1 knows by whom dissolved. And on specified a weak basis, he builds his explanation that specified a “important and uncomfortable question” must be put up, and from a thick tube it is wailing: “Assessing whether a organization taking into account factors specified as anti-Semitism does well (...) or wrong... is simply a subject for a separate analysis.” I think that as long as the Olejnik has gone, the thesis on anti-Semitism (in KO or among KO-M.P. voters) based on any anonymous message calls for vengeance to heaven. This is how alternate topics are created in the media, which replace crucial questions for candidates in the race to the Presidential Palace.