Questioning the judgments of the courts, or wider judgments, was an eternal taboo subject and at the same time the domain of daze. I remember perfectly well that contrary to logic, decency, reason and yet the letter of law, various “authorities” as the mantra repeated: "The case is not commented upon." This was happening in the environment of almost all and the widest circles of lawyers, from prosecutors, lawyers and counsellors, and even to judges, although all of them either wrote or recognized "discussions with judgments" called complaints, appeals, cassations.
Today, appearances are completely different and not only are discussed in "better company", but the position of judges and full Chambers in the ultimate Court is questioned, and of course the Constitutional Court does not exist. A abrupt change in the viewpoint is not entirely due to a change in the seating position, in fact small has changed in this substance in terms of individual cases. The “authorities” are inactive “authorities”, judges, lawyers, but the failure of the monopoly is unbearable. The Postpeerel arrangement in the judiciary was as ossified as the PZPN, and erstwhile any "forest grandparents" were chased and the forces did not equalize so much as the monopoly ceased to exist, then the real war began. What's this war all about? As the classics utilized to say, "to make things the way they utilized to be," that is, to return to the dominance of 1 political option.
The determination in this quest is so large that the current power representatives with its fanatical background do not care at all about the utmost hypocrisy and grotesqueness of their actions. ‘Restoreing the regulation of law’, including the Constitution, He's inactive flying on the banners.. Examples of this are the Multum, but it is rather adequate to callback the unlawful appeal and appointment of the National Prosecutor, the "revocation" of the countersignature by Donald Tusk, and it is the most apparent violation of the law that Waldemar Żurek committed by abolishing the statutory request to draw judges. In addition to determination, 1 can besides see the typical belief for each ruling squad that power is given forever, but this arrogant naivety will be brutally verified sooner than later.
The attitude of celebrities, as any professors, journalists and politicians, can aid in this process. An increasingly disconcerting reality based on scandalous actions by prosecutors and court rulings is simply a clear alarm bell for "normals", but those who despised the erstwhile power until they saw what the current power is capable of. any of them, specified as Krzysztof Stanowski, have personally learned how courts work, others have seen the actions of the prosecutor during the express prosecution of Jerzy Owsiak's “headers”. Almost all week something equally upsetting appears, and it builds an indigestive image of "fighting democracy", but so far without major consequences. The main focus of the war is the Polish War, on which the “anti-system” groups benefit.
However, all measurement changes 1 day, and all spell, whether bitter or sweet, transfers. Where are we now? It seems between the lips and the edge of the cup. A suffering nation, constantly dazed by substitute themes, inactive endures, but matures to specified a condition in which to "smiled democracy" will send a vulgar excuse. In Poland, the regulation that the biggest enemy of power is the power itself, the Law and Justice has seen it, and the “coalition of 13 December” will see it. The misfortune of the current ruling squad is that they themselves broke down many doors, through which they will fly out with a bang.
