- Sheligowski stresses that the situation on the front is inactive unstable and Ukraine would not be curious in fast talks
- It indicates that an agreement with Russia is not possible, and the maximum possible is simply a ceasefire
- He estimates that the political nonsubjective is to preserve Ukraine's sovereign statehood. Russia — according to the expert — is not curious in territorial gains
- More crucial information can be found on the Onetu homepage
“What Trump and his administration are doing is not completely incompatible with the Ukrainian point of view,” said Dr. Szeligowski. He explained that negotiations alone do not contradict the Ukrainian concept. The expert pointed out that "the main worrying difference of Zelenski" was the fact that the Ukrainian president expected him to meet Donald Trump before Vladimir Putin.
Daniel Szeligowski believes talks will not come soon. “ Ukraine would not want these talks to happen next day either. The situation on the front is inactive unstable, he explained.
There will be no peace with Russia. Maximum ‘defence of arms’
Expert he disagreed with Donald Trump that “there would be any agreement”. He explained that "the maximum possible is simply a ceasefire, what we sometimes call a frost of conflict."
Dr. Szeligowski was asked by Marcin Zawada about whether there is simply a chance of a European army.
— I am skeptical, but I do not regulation out that there will be a critical mass of political will if there is political will, there will be instruments and there will be money," he explained.
Expert on the future of Ukraine
The question of what the future of Ukraine awaits, he replied, “Suspending a weapon is the backbone of this full situation, then all the details around the ceasefire will be absolutely crucial to the future of Ukraine.
The expert besides formulated "the explanation of triumph for Ukraine". — Our political goal is to guarantee that a free, sovereign Ukrainian state, in the sense of statehood, survives in the largest Ukrainian territory. We defend Ukrainian statehood, not Ukrainian territory,” he explained. As he added, although it seems controversial, looking at Russian war goals, Russia is not fighting for a larger territory. “ Russia came to break up Ukrainian statehood to conquer Ukraine in a political sense.
— This political objective, a strong Ukrainian statehood, is an optimum goal we are aiming for. If we were to present specified a explanation to the Trump administration, I think these points (common) are very large here.o — concluded Dr. Daniel Szeligowski.
The expert was besides asked about possible destabilisation actions of Russia in the case of elections in Ukraine. Dr. Szeligowski thinks it is crucial to ask why elections are to take place.
— Should they be, due to the fact that the Russians have presented specified a condition for talks, or should they be, due to the fact that the United States is afraid that president Zelenski has no legitimacy to sign a possible peace agreement. Is the United States afraid that Ukrainian society will not accept the conditions of peace imposed on them and so a fresh leader in Ukraine is needed, which specified public support will have," he explained.
