– The alleged pandemic has shown us most clearly that people are divided into 2 groups: rulers and subjects. Subjects turn into slaves, even though they do not accept irrational law, they strictly obey it. That's what we had during the pandemic. Not just that. The multitude of Polish citizens and another countries has become signalers, i.e. self-appointed guardians of the strategy and this is the worst... – says ed. Witold Gadowski, "Right Simple PLUS" expert on PCh24 TV.
Sir, are you a supporter or an opponent of globalisation?
I am opposed to globalisation and the promoter of localism, what did I call action for local communities?
Is it possible in the modern planet to quit globalisation for localism?
First of all, common sense is needed. Let us take advantage globally of what benefits us, but at the same time, let us defend what is most crucial to us, or local things.
This is possible with a reasonable and conscious approach to the technological explosion, due to the fact that it is 1 of the keys to explaining the modern world, the modern mentality, the contemporary behaviour of the majority. This technological detonation enables globalization of the planet and changes in civilization, social and simply human.
In your book “The End of the planet Is Only the Beginning. The script of the collapse of globalisation" by Peter Zeihan, in addition to the technology to which I hope to go, is the main motive for agriculture and global change in it, and I do not mean the alleged climate change...
It's true. Agriculture is 1 of the key elements of globalisation. We are utilized to contact food producers. Food producers become so to put it, "exotic element", even in agrarian areas. This shows that we are increasingly dependent on distribution and everything related to distributionism.
By making us dependent on distribution, it makes us dependent on global bureaucracy, which is already conducted not even by individual countries, but by global companies.
The mastery of the food market, the mastery of food distribution leads to dependence and thus to the failure of freedom.
Can it so be argued that all the "agricultural subsidies" provided by Brussels were intended and not to aid farmers, but to destruct agriculture?
Definitely! The “surcharge” was intended to overpower agriculture, take distant its independence, which is inherently a feature of agricultural activity and depend on central funds. In short, the thought was that independent people, as farmers have been for centuries, make bureaucratic customers, and this is slow happening.
Are farmers able to cope with the strategy created by the EU without "surcharge" from Brussels?
So provided that, together with the subsidies, the stupid EU rules limiting food production and quality will be eliminated. But that is not going to happen. The EU and national governments will never let this, due to the fact that they know that farmers would be able to thrive in the market. By making farmers dependent on "surcharge" they simply have them in their hands.
Zeihan points out that there is virtually no specified thing as "food security" in a globalised planet due to the fact that it is won by economics. It turns out that it is cheaper to bring food from Bolivia or Ukraine than to produce it...
The aim is to distance food producers from consumers, thus making both groups dependent on distribution mechanisms, brokering mechanisms and global trade mechanisms.
And what about demography, another crucial component of globalisation according to the author of the book “The End of the planet Is Only the Beginning”? In his opinion, it is the demographic collapse that will lead to the end of the planet we know...
I agree with that opinion. A demographic collapse, which is the consequence of primitively understood maltussianism, or artificial explanation of resources, besides called overcrowding theory. In short, the point is that since the population is increasing in geometric advancement and the production of food in arithmetic, it is inevitable that there is overcrowding. Malthusianism has proved to be a useful and crucial concept for global bureaucracy.
I would add a immense gap between the detonation of technology and theology and ethics. Theology and ethics just don't keep up with the technological explosion. Theology and ethics do not keep up with the formation of fresh areas of human existence, which yet leads to the formation of black holes. Just as black holes make in space, immersing everything that happens in their path, so in the planet a black gap is created on the rule of an implosion of civilization, which will pull into itself, which means it will simply destruct the full civilization that we know...
The author of the book, which is the origin of our discussion, emphasizes that he is not, for example, an opponent of women's career. He only points out that this entails a demographic collapse. The second origin causing the demographic collapse is the industrial revolution and technological progress...
It's true. I'll say more: everybody sees it, but no 1 wants to or cannot counter it, look for solutions, alternatives. Instead, she scares us with overcrowding, and women who postpone matrimony “for later” or decide that alternatively of a kid they will have a dog, are praised and set a function model.
No 1 is saying that today, if we had gathered all the inhabitants of the Earth in Australia, we would have reached the population, the density of the population we have in Silesia. This makes us realize how large the resources and capabilities of Earth are, and even though most of our planet is occupied by the oceans.
It shows what lies media and politicians feed us.
Zehain puts the thesis that due to the demographic collapse of the planet we know; the planet in which we live; the globalized planet will fall faster than the top pessimists predicted...
The American strategist calls it “the end of the world”. In my opinion, it will be a transition to a different phase of civilization. Zehain is undoubtedly right – our civilization is ending, inevitably.
There are many factors that affect this phenomenon. 1 of them is cultural melange. Another demographic collapse. Another dependence of increasing human masses on distribution, making them customers etc.
What will the fresh planet look like, or a fresh phase of civilization?
It will be a clientistic planet in which most of the Earth's population will be subjected to strict rigors of large economical camps...
Quite a violent statement...
Yes, but it gives back the essence of things. We will simply be concentrated in certain areas without economical law, without administrative law, without the right to decision freely around the world, without the right to any of our fundamental freedoms. For whom will the world’s resources be? For the financial oligarchs and only for them... For the half-gods, as the guru of transhumanism and the concept of the fresh man Juwal Noach Harari clearly says.
What will we be dealing with? With fresh communism?
It will be a completely different, fresh totalitarianism, which has not yet been given a professional name. For this totalitarianism, ideologies specified as communism are only tools. It is primarily about camping people from the mediate and low caste and giving the resources of the planet to the higher caste. To make a global society, but caste like Indian. In my opinion, it is India, not China, not the USSR, that is the inspiration for modern globalists.
Was the final test that showed that all this was accelerating and there was no time, or even the anticipation of meaningful countering was the alleged coronavirus pandemic?
Yeah. This was an excellent test of whether irrational rules could be enforced by administrative methods. It turned out to be possible.
So-called. The pandemic has shown us that people are divided into 2 groups: rulers and subjects. Subjects turn into slaves, even though they do not accept irrational law, they strictly obey it. That's what we had during the pandemic.
Not just that. The multitude of Polish citizens and another countries has become signalers, i.e. self-appointed guardians of the strategy and this is the worst...
Is the fireman worse than the slave?
Definitely. During the alleged coronavirus pandemic, in my opinion, we were dealing with a global experimentation by Zimbardo conducted in the 1970s on students at Stanford University. Students were divided into castes of prisoners and guards. Due to the drastic nature of its course, the experimentation was discontinued during the course, as it turned out that students playing the function of guards get the worst, most brutal qualities of actual guards, and students playing the prisoners' qualities of prisoners.
Prisoners, among others, began to suck up to guards and study on fellow prisoners. Eventually, they rebelled and then developed an escape plan. The guards first abused the prisoners mentally and then physically... Even forced prisoners to commit homosexual acts.
Unfortunately today, this is happening on a global scale. The people are barracks, subjected to the administrative rigors of prisons and supervised. Then it turns out that a large part of the population betrays their desire to cooperate with the strategy on a reporting basis.
This is worse than slavery.
Totalitarianism complete?
This is totalitarianism, which will wear appearances of "the good of humanity". This is an old Promethean thought that 1 must take the gods first and give the qualities of divinity to certain people, because, as we know, not all man is perfect. Since only a fewer elites are perfect and flawless, she is the only 1 who can full realize humanity. All the remainder must full service this “perfect elite”.
Is that where we're going with this?
Yeah. Most people most likely knock on the head and think, "Gadowski is crazy." Well? I said the apparent a fewer years ago. erstwhile they came, it was no laughing matter, but unfortunately no 1 remembered that I and others were alerting. We've been alerting not due to the fact that we're someway super insightful. We just think and learn.
When do you think China will collapse due to the policy of 1 kid resulting in a Chinese demographic disaster? It's not just that the Chinese are going to be less and fewer, it's that according to the policy of 1 kid in China, girls were murdered in the wombs of mothers, and consequently there's just no 1 to have children...
China has so far cleverly avoided the pitfalls of the global world. For example, they managed to avoid a mortgage trap that destroyed the Anglo-Saxon economy and made various fundsoligarchised. In China, they were simply selling apartments to people who were able to repay them, who had credit skills.
At the moment, the demographic collapse we see in the West is avoided by importing women from the surrounding countries, which are almost on slave status. In this way, Beijing is trying to overcome the demographic problems caused by the policy of 1 child. We'll see what happens in a fewer years.
Prior to the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the Chinese, according to the most cautious estimates, "rented" respective 1000 surrogates each year in Ukraine...
They did not only in Ukraine. For them, the race was invalid, the colour of the skin was invalid, etc. The Chinese came out of the eugenic presumption that mixing genes brings a stronger race. Chinese scientists said that.
China has money to buy children. They besides have technological capabilities to produce modern Lebensborns. I apologize for the drastic nature of the word used, but he's the most precise in this case.
China is making up Lebensborne today. They are decently designed, technologically prepared, without Nazi cruelty.
This is simply a completely different civilization that fights Western civilization. Regardless of which civilization wins, they have the same goal – the end of the planet as we know it. The question is how fast this process will go. In my opinion, with Chinese leadership, this will be done faster and more decisively. Beijing will not look at the values of old civilizations to which China does not have a service.
Why does China want “the planet to end”?
China wants to dominate the planet nevertheless orderly it is. And since the Chinese like order, globalization is good for them. However, this is not about the globalisation proposed after planet War II by the US, the alleged Pax Americana. They want to globalize a technologically subordinate utilitarian Chinese thought.
So Pax Americana is coming to Pax China?
Now is the time of bipolarity, which will last for the next fewer years. From this period, the dominant will emerge.
Economic, political, military?
Civilization, through technological dominance.
And isn't it as any alleged geostrategists are trying to convince us that we are dealing with a conflict between “freedom” that is allegedly represented by the United States and “communism” represented by China?
There is no American freedom. These are the appearances behind which lies a narrow group of financial oligarchs coupled with conventional families of prime roots having the top influence in the United States.
Talking about expected “freedom” is simply a flag for the masses.
How about this: possibly it's a conflict between American vocalism, LGBT-yzm, BLM-ism and another types of neo-marksism with Chinese communism?
This is all that you have said, and especially vokeism is utilized to break up the old civilization, from which a fresh technological civilization is to appear indifferent ethically. She won't be good or bad. There will only be what is useful and useless.
This civilization, which is designed in the West, primarily in the US coincides with the reasoning of the Chinese Communist Party.
How do we build localism in this regard?
We must fight to stay in the enclaves in which we can live. And for that to happen, we gotta build them first and then learn to defend them.
For now, we must act and build awareness of as many people as possible. In many meetings involving hundreds and sometimes even thousands of people, I can see that many of them have been taught to think and draw conclusions over the years, trying to convince themselves that reasoning is not worthwhile, due to the fact that individual else will come up with everything for us. We don't have elites that are willing to focus on education and thinking. The alleged elites we have are cosmopolitan. Their representatives dream of doing careers in the West and earning in Euros, which we find in all Euro-Election.
However, this is only part of the problem of Poland and Poles. Apart from the fact that our “elites” discourage us from reasoning and drawing conclusions, we do not have elites that would actually defend us. So we must defend ourselves, including through localism.
But we do have "elites" that encourage us to constantly consume...
We are under the force of the Western world, the self-propelled device of consumption. It's just going fast.
Speaking of localism, you mean the commune? The District? All of Poland?
I mean a community of people who realize each another and who are friendly and honest towards each other. These people can radiate into wider areas and build a wider community. It is primarily about restoring civilization from the simplest communities.
Is this even possible in Poland, where the war between Tusk and Kaczyński and Tuski has been going on for years?
Nope. Neither Kaczyński nor Tusk are aware of what is truly happening. They fight for immediate influences and scraps resulting from appearances of power in the Polish area.
By building localism, we cannot trust on 1 organization or another, on 1 organization or another. Let us act bottom-up, organize and support each other. It's hard work for a fewer generations, but we gotta take it. Otherwise, they'll make us worse than slaves...
God bless the conversation.
Tomasz D. Kolanek
