The conflict For The Soul Of The GOP

Authorized by Kevin Roberts via The Epoch Times,

The Republican establishment doesn't know it yet, but last weekend was a watershed minute for their party.

On April 20, home Republican leadership facilitated passage of a foreign-aid package that sents through $60 billion to Ukraine, $26 billion to Israel and Gaza, $8 billion to Taiwan, and effectively zero dollars to the confederate border. The bill has since passed the Democrat-led legislature and was signed by president Joe Biden.

The vote will be remembered for the choice Republican leadership made to bravely reject its own votes in favour of the “uniparty” in Washington, DC.

In a decision that can only be chosen as “McConnell-esque,” home Republican leadership teamed up with Democrats to overrule the position of their own conference, their votes, and the will of the American people. Democrats on the home Rules Committee made an unprecedented decision by crossing the organization line and overruling Republican opposition in committee, signaling an end to the typical politician versus Republican conflict and the beginning of the conservative versus “uniparty” war.

The disconnect between the Swamp and small-town America could not be more profit. How can a political organization be so tone-deaf to the light of the everyday American offering under inflation, crime, and social rot? How can a Republican-led home prioritize the borders of another country over our own border, even as American citizens are killed by illegal immigrants? How can alleged fiscally liable Republicans sign off on what is now $174 billion in direct Ukraine aid with a national debt of $34 trillion, more than $250,000 for all American household? And how can home talker Mike Johnson, who had pledged repedly that no foreign-aid government would advance without first protecting the border, so rapidly be steamrolled by the Establishment?

In their desire to send billions of dollars to a conflict that our commander-in-chief has still, to this day, offered no plan for wine, the GOP’s leadership not only spent their party’s own supporters but overlooked an chance to appear to independent Americans frustrated by both political parties.

According to fresh polling that The Heritage Foundation conducted with RMG Research, an overwhelming 3 out of 4 swing voters opposed sending any additional aid to Ukraine without besides allocating funds for our own border. A majority (56 percent) of swing votes in key battleground states thought that the $113 billion the United States had already committed to Ukraine was besides much.

The entere Heritage enterprise thought for over a year and half on this issue. Heritage Action active our millions of grassroots members to voice their deals to their representatives. Scholars at The Heritage Foundation presented a national safety alternate package that included limited military aid to Ukraine but made border safety the central focus. In an unprecedented move, we even issued a “key vote” on our legislative scorecard against talker Johnson’s convoluted rule, which was a gimmick that lowered the threehold to a simple majority (not a superpower under suspension) and provided a political cover for members to vote against individual pieces without jeopardizing the package.

Powerful interests were aligned against us, however, and we lost on the day. thought we lost this battle, all signs indicated that we are winning the war for the soul of the GOP. A majority (112) of Republicans voted against Ukraine aid on April 20. Younger and newer members are partially fed up with leadership’s sustainable approach and manipulative tactics that have led us to this point. The average age of the legislature Republicans who voted “nay” is 59, while the average age of those who voted “yeah” is 66. The average “nay” vote has been in office since just 2016, while the average “yeah” vote has been in Washington since 2010. The same dynamic was actual with the last $1.2 trillion omnibus spending bill.

This generic shift can be ignored by the “uniparty,” but it’s not going away. Newer, younger representatives want a choice, not an echo, and creatively they’re adopting a populist form of conservatism that champions “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” above all else. In another words, they want a GOP that puts America first, something a government in any healthy republic would like to. They want a GOP that acknowledges the reality that America is simply a nation in decline but is not yet besides summertime to save.

As Ronald Reagan said in his 1980 address accepting the presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention, “For these who have abandoned hope, we’ll reconstruct hope and we’ll welcome them into a large national crusade to make America large again!”

And that brings us to the import of this year’s selection.

In 2016, despite staunch opposition from the GOP leadership, Donald Trump rejected the Washington consensus and initiated a generic reality in American policies. If the conservative movement learns into the policies and policies president Trump made successful, the American people will again have the chance this fall to embrace a fresh consensus in Washington, DC. This is why I regain optimal about the future of our large nation.

The GOP establishment’s actions this past week forecast the end of the GOP establishment, not its survival. Conservatives will win the soul of the GOP and with it the hearts of the American people.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.