The Berlin legislature ordered and paid with taxpayers' money a dossier on anti-Semitism in queer environments. erstwhile the paper was ready, officials kept it in the drawer for six months, they folded 1 copy in the library of parliament — and yet announced that their own order lacked “quality, accuracy and balance”. The reason for the inconvenience is simple: the study describes what is not appropriate in the German capital — the solidarity of a condition of the rainbow avant-garde with movements in which homosexuals endanger to hang.
The calendar of a certain disappearance
History begins innocently. The legislature administration for labour, social affairs, equality, integration, diversity and anti-discrimination — the name at which the Polish provincial office looks like a minimalist’s business card — orders a survey by writer Stefan Lauer entitled “The scope, dissemination and importance of anti-Semitism in queer environments in Berlin”. Price: 10 1000 euros. Publication date announced in November 2025: the first 4th of 2026.
The first 4th is over. The another one, too. Dossier does not appear anywhere — neither on the payer's website, nor in the press release, nor even in those ritual entries on social networks, which the Berlin legislature celebrates all gold spent on "diversity".
Only on June 12, 2026, the paper goes to the library of the Chamber of Members. Not on the Internet. Not to the media. To libraries. In 2026, in a city that can send a push notification about changing the timetable of a tram, the only way to a 49-page PDF file is to personalize to the reading room. It is hard to find a more beautiful monument to modern information management.
Publicly available, the study lands on July 10 — on the website of an anti-Semitism attorney, about where a average individual seeks it last.
Guilty found himself — and he confessed
The case could have stayed that way if it hadn't been for the parliamentary hearing. Frank-Christian Hansel of AfD asked straight why the paid survey had disappeared for respective months. And then the thing that happens in the German administration is seen little frequently than the eclipse of the Sun: the answer was given by the Secretary of State Max Landero of the SPD, admitting that the decision to hold on made he himself.
Reason? "Substantial and temporal priorities".
Let's remember this formula, due to the fact that it's elegant. I didn't "fear a riot before the parade." Not "theme was politically embarrassing". crucial and temporary priorities. The Berlin legislature had more urgent things to do than print a study that he ordered himself, paid for it himself and announced it himself. Quoted by "Tagespiegel" the commentary on this translation was concise: "It sounds like an excuse to me."
Review of your own order
However, the best comes in mid-July. legislature administration in public distances itself from the paper she ordered, stating that the paper lacked "quality, accuracy and balance", so that the authoritative publication under its own name was "not included".
Let's translate it into human language. Office elects contractor. The Office shall sign the contract. The Office pays EUR 10 000 from the public register. The office is taking over. And then the office sets up the 1 and hides it in the library, as if he wasn't the author of the full project.
If the dossier was so poor, the question arises of the qualifications of the contractor — who chose the contractor and who took the product? But if it was okay, the question is different: what precisely did it disturb? There is no 3rd possibility. The Berlin legislature chose a variant in which it ridicules itself regardless of which answer is true.
It is worth noting that the author never hid the nature of his work. The dossier is clearly referred to as a qualitative "point light" — based on an analysis of discourse in social media, professional literature, and conversations with people from the environment — alternatively than as a typical quantitative survey. To accuse him after the fact that there is no "balance" is so like ordering a sketch with a pencil and claiming that he is not oil on a canvas.
What was inside
The contents explain everything. The study states that after Hamas' massacre on October 7, 2023, the situation in part of Berlin's queer scene has clearly intensified. Whoever wants to belong to certain circles is “feel the expanding force to take a stand against Israel.” The rejection of Israel became a test of loyalty in practice, and Jews are welcome in these environments, provided that they execute a appropriate act of same - criticism in advance.
The BDS run is described in the paper as a "global integration ideology" in which anti-semites meet from completely different backgrounds — and this conviction is most likely the most accurate in the full study. circumstantial spaces are listed: Internationalist Queer Pride, positioned as an alternate to the "commercialized" CSD parade, Dyke March, part of club culture and social media. Ariel Elbert of Kesheet Deutschland says without a uncertainty that Berlin queer environments have reached the utmost point.
The author besides formulates a conviction that should hang in a frame in all office of diversity: the conflict for liberation, which sacrifices 1 number to stand on the allegedly right side of history, betrays its own ideals — and queer utopia in which Jews are welcome only if their identity is denied, no utopia is.
Hand in hand
And here we come to the point that Berlin's "Berliner Zeitung" included in the title about the queer scene going hand in hand with Islamists. Dossier describes a situation in which progressive activists solidarity with Hamas and the Iranian government — an organization and a state whose order of values is fundamentally hostile to women and homosexuals. In Iran, the death punishment continues for monosexual relations. In Gaza, the rainbow flag on the mast has nowhere to appear.
Imagine this scene: an activist marches through Berlin streets under the slogans of solidarity with the movement that, if that activist had walked with a akin banner in Tehran, would have dealt with his case in a permanent and irreversible manner. This isn't an alliance. It is simply a collective confusion in its own strategy of values, described on 49 pages, paid from taxes and hidden into the library, so that no 1 notices.
A Moral for Followers
From the full issue comes the science, which is worth remembering besides over the Vistula River, where the political class enthusiastically copies Berlin's governance patterns "diversity".
When ideology collides with facts, the office does not abandon ideology. The Authority orders a study on facts, pays for it, reads it and then decides that the facts are insufficiently balanced.
The Berlin legislature did not hide the anti-Semitism paper due to the fact that it was bad. He hid it due to the fact that it was good. And that's the only thing in this communicative that's not funny.
