School of deception, that is, pushing "health" education

1

Health education has already suffered a social failure at the start – last year about 70 percent of students signed out of the class, which shows that parents mostly did not accept the fresh subject of the MEN.

2

The withdrawal of part of sexual content from the compulsory program does not mean giving up ideology – content relating to sex or LGBT has besides been included in the programme basis in another modules, including human rights and anti-discrimination.

3

MEN is trying to tame society with tiny steps of wellness education – reducing the most controversial elements to reassure parents and reduce social opposition and then let for gradual expansion of the scope of mandatory content.

4

The perfect nature of the program goes beyond the issues of sexuality – the author points out, among others, the way of presenting marriage, divorce and motherhood, as well as the unilateral treatment of climate change and "talk of hatred".

5

The wellness education dispute is in fact a dispute over the right of parents to rise children – the text calls for opposition to the ideology of the school, the usage of the anticipation of releasing children from optional content and the political assessment of government activities.

Already in September, or only in 2 weeks, the alleged wellness education will enter schools as a compulsory subject – an ideological concept whose crucial primary goal was the sexual indoctrination of children, but to a greater degree simply left-wing furnishing of their minds. In practice, EZ besides means limiting the influence of parents on the education of their children in terms of content, which is straight related to ethical and spiritual formation. The importance of the content passed on to children in schools, in their peers, is considerable.

We should not be deceived that a part of the program of this subject straight focused on sexuality did not enter the compulsory EZ corps and will inactive be able to retreat its children from it – at least theoretically, due to the fact that it is hard to imagine how this withdrawal of single children or teenagers from part of the class will look in practice. It is apparent that the leftist – in this case it can be said fairly, highly left-wing – Minister of Education Barbara Nowacka has been trying to cook society like a proverbial frog, putting parents and students in a hard situation since this year.

Let's start with the fact that the wellness education task did not gain public approval. Last year, as many as 70% of primary and secondary school students signed out of the subject to be attended by default. So their parents took active action to make the classrooms in the class empty. Yes, it can be pointed out that the percent of participation – or deficiency of participation – in classes with EZ has entered into a certain tendency of the Polish society's reluctance towards optional activities – but this is not the happiest form of defence of the fresh subject.

In the 2019/2020 school year, about half of the students attended the Tusk-Nowack duo's household education classes, while in the last year of operation it was only 33%. There are 2 ways to explain this. First of all, convincing parents and students that the WEDZ program was not good adequate to be worth an extra hr erstwhile it was not essential to do so. Secondly, the object already coming off the agenda of lessons was necessarily losing the residual meaning that he might have in his parents' eyes – this object will not be there any more, why bother with it.

All the more so, the 30% attendance on the fresh subject, which, alongside the negation of religion from schools, was the flagship educational task of the Tusk government and the Nowacka minister, must be considered a disaster. This means that many ruling coalition voters besides wrote their children out of a new, introduced with a tug, subject. Even though any of them have done so with the same pragmatic automation with which they have written out children from the EZ, in no way does this rise the fatal assessment of the EZ society. The HED may have needed improvement and renewal after many years of unconvincing operation, but as far as EZ is concerned, it has suffered a full disaster already at the start.

It is worth noting that regional data shows a large scope of participation – 35.7 percent of students attended wellness education classes in Gorzów Wielkopolski, 32.9 percent in Poznań, and only 14.5 percent in Rzeszów, suggesting that local opposition – stronger in little secularised regions – was besides important, alongside organizational and household logistics factors. So comparing the failure of the EZ to the weak interest of the EZ is nothing more than masking the bad social reception of this project.

The Ministry of Education, but besides Donald Tusk, had to realize that without utilizing a trick EZ would not be easy introduced to schools due to the fact that parents mostly do not want this subject for their children. This year's announcement of the removal of sexual themes from the compulsory program of the subject is so not a backward step, as government factors and any commentators convince us, but a lulling vigilance fortitude. It is clear that this kind of game was directed to that part of society that tried to symmetry its opinion last year. The slogan of this symmetry was "health education" – yes, "sexual education" – no.

However, the problem is besides that the Ministry of Education destroyed the distributed strategy of forming students for a healthy life, only to be able to pack it into 1 object and then poison it with its ideology. The treatment was clever, many people actually began to confuse the wellness elements of EZ with the ideological cartridge, which, in many aspects, dominated the full programming basis. Without a doubt, many citizens, erstwhile they heard that sexual themes would not be enforced as a mandatory part of the EZ, were relieved and no longer curious in the subject. Since winter, the Ministry of Education has led a game of appearances towards parents. The Ministry argued that in a spirit of compromise, the content referred to as "sexual education" would stay optional. But in practice, it was just an illusion building.

What is the deception that is presently being served to us? Take a concrete example. On the very basis of the programme, elements related to sex ideology and LGBT postulates have not been classified as part of the “sexual education” module — under the name of human rights and anti-discrimination, and thus in the part considered mandatory. Thus, it can be said that harmful content has been declared to be removed from the mandatory content of the subject, but in fact many toxic content has remained there due to the fact that it is not under the apparent name. specified manipulation is not difficult, fewer people – apart from specialists – have an orientation in the structure of the programming base.

Health education is saturated with a fresh imagination of a man completely submissive to his own weakness and, at the same time, spiritually dependent on ideological justifications brought to him by the far left. For example, the program sets out a sign of equality between matrimony and informal relationships, and divorce or dissolution of the household presents as a kind of natural, "normal" life change. However, in the most ideological way it is shown in the programming basis of EZ motherhood, which is, after all, a value protected straight by the Constitution. However, we know that the leaders of democracy fighting the Constitution of the Republic of Poland just don't care. In the programming materials, the ministry cites a full catalog of feminist phobias and appears primarily in the context of a threat to the intellectual wellness of a woman, not as a reality that should be given support and respect. Therefore, it is not amazing that, while there was a provision in the programming basis for the WEDZ that "the disciple has respect for human life from conception to natural death," it is only in the EZ that "the dignity of man is simply a fundamental value at all stages of his life"—but there is no direct mention of life from conception.

That's not the only disturbing theme. The EZ besides includes a "environmental health" block in which the student is to learn to "recognise climate change misinformation and its impact on health" and indicates "reliable and reliable sources of information" on this subject. However, the technological and public debate on environmental problems is not conclusively resolved, yet 1 pre-imposed communicative will be presented to the students, which is hard to call an ideological narrative. In this respect, the State should simply refrain from pushing forward positions that may should be decommissioned in the future. Furthermore, the attitude toward nature has a clear ethical aspect, so it should be left in the area of parental responsibility, as should the upbringing of a peculiar worldview or religion. But the problem is besides political – ecology divides the electorates into different groups and one-sided formation in the field of "environmental health" is nothing more than an effort by the left to rise future voters.

Another component of concern is the module to counter the alleged hatred speech — a concept that for years has been utilized by extremist communities to silence voices critical of abortion or sex ideology. There is simply a real hazard that children will be raised in the belief that the expression of certain completely legal views is in itself a “talk of hatred” and so deserves to be excluded from public debate.

If we do not argue today, like last year, the leftist regime, the continuation of events will be something completely obvious. After we are tired of the society dragging through discussion and tame us all with a fresh subject, the strategy will be completely closed. It can be done in 2 ways – either the "sexual health" will be included in the compulsory EZ programme without a reference, or the scope of the excluded content will be consistently depleted until it yet becomes an empty harvest. And then Minister Nowacka and her ideological acolytes will launch a run of embarrassment that, of course, the planet did not end with the introduction of the EZ, and even it is rather well, while critics proved to be "dark-gardens". Unfortunately, the consequences of bad education will no longer be borne by government feminists, but young people who leave school with intellectual confusion. Even greater than what they receive from ubiquitous media.

What is the position of countermeasures? We have 3 ways to argue the actions of the government, which destruct the axiological foundations of Polish education – to protest, compose children out of the educational block devoted to sexual education, and vote next year against those who already present program the demolition of the destiny of future Polish generations. Against Polish experience, against the constitution and common sense.

Author: Tomasz Rowiński – elder investigation squad in the task “Ordo Iuris: Civilization” of the Ordo Iuris Institute, editor of “Christianitas”, editor of the website Affirmation.info, historian of ideas, journalist, author of books; he published in “The Bastards of Dante. Sketches about the disappearance and rebirth of visible Christianity, “The kingdom not of this world. On the principles of Catholic Poland on the basis of newer and earlier events, “Turbopapiestwo. On the dynamics of a certain crisis", "Anachronous Modernity. Essays on the Civilization of Violence". He lives in Ksiażenice close Grodzisk Mazowiecki.