To be honest, I am not following “our” and our media, so I do not know if anyone has mentioned 2 articles that have been published in the leading American media in fresh days. And it is simply a truly dense caliber!!! The first is an article by Robert Kagan, who appeared in The Atlantic. The title itself is like batting: Checkmate in Iran Washington can’t reverse or control the comparisons of losing this war. "The chessmate in Iran Washington is incapable to reverse or master the consequences of its defeat in this war. First of all, fewer people in our country know who Kagan is. His wife Victoria "fuck the EU" Nuland is more known. Both belong to the ellipse of people that Thierry Meyssan describes as “straussian” — they are people who practically form US politics behind the scenes. Kagan is co-author Project for the fresh American Century – a task for the fresh American century, which is simply a road map (I hatred that term) for US politics. Our country has no policies of its own, and there are no people here to work on it, so there is no 1 here who is the equivalent of Kagan. So I cannot give a comparison from our yard, but imagine the situation that at the end of the pontificate of John Paul II Cardinal Dziwisz writes for the Weekly a article about the content of “Dear Believers, we lost to Satan the war for the souls of young people. Mandatory spiritual lessons in schools have failed.” That's the weight of Kagan's article! But it's not over! At the same time in Gazeta Wyborcza any prof. of theology writes that the church has no chance of fighting Satan! And he states that the amount of prayers and exorcism that the church can execute is much little than the amount of evil that Satan can do. Comparable to something like this, the article was published in The Washington Post. This is an interview with a CIA analyst who has been doing an analysis of the improvement of the Chinese army since 1985. Now imagine what the faithful will think of specified articles. I'm certain they'll be wondering who's more powerful and who's worth praying to. This is precisely the situation in which our country is located. We learn that the hegemon that was expected to defend us, and which we thought was a power, is simply a simple paper tiger, which is not only not a protection for us, but a threat, due to the fact that its presence in our territory puts us in danger of attacking – even a atomic attack! Is anyone in our country talking about it? Does society even realize that? The answer to both questions is NO!!! We are ruled by marionettes, substituted and controlled by abroad forces, and society is so stupid that specified a message is simply a typical cognitive dissonance for it, so it will respond to it with aggression – like children who have been told that there is no Santa Claus. Unfortunately, this is the situation in our country. We do not see and realize that we are one more time being pushed into another's war. But this time it can forever turn our country – as Medvedev said – into a somewhat melted area.
Don't realize my false example! The United States is not fighting evil! USA is evil in the purest form!!! All I'm saying is to make both articles clear. They weren't written by any journalists without a clue! Kagan is simply a man who has shaped and continues to form US politics for decades, Culver has followed the improvement of the Chinese army for respective decades. They're people who know what they're saying. If we were a average society, we would now consider changing "care" or at least normalising relations with Russia and Belarus (I will not mention China anymore), due to the fact that they are countries that are not threatening us, and cooperation and trade with them would be much more beneficial to us than faithful relations with the West. Unfortunately, there's no indication that we're going this way.
But do these 2 articles truly mean the fall and end of the American Empire? No! No! It's besides early for that! Yes, both authors are right!! The U.S. is not the kind of military power they are considered to be. Experts have known this a long time ago, and Iran has only made it clear to a wide audience raised in Hollywood fairy tales. To be honest, I am annoyed by commentators who focus on the unquestionably military defeat of the U.S. in Iran. I've tried to explain.That the world's 3rd war already under way, only in a tiny part is classical war. The structures of which the United States is simply a tool are well aware that the actual power of the United States does not lie in the number of soldiers, aircraft and ships! The actual power of the United States lies in the control of the global settlement system. The exclusion from this strategy is simply a death conviction for most economical and political countries. This makes it possible to force virtually all government. Another component is information control. It's a anticipation to control the alleged public opinion. It's the ability to control full societies. These structures besides control most of the major planet media. Here too, American media and online concerns are their tool. And here we come to primitive methods of force in the form of slander. Let us mention here only the "Jebstein" affair and our celebrated "Subcarpathian affair".
Iran is simply a peculiar case. It is an old civilization, with an intelligent and highly educated society, developed manufacture and field assets, which let the country to be converted into a fortress, virtually impossible to get by classical methods. Shock and awe – a typical American military strategy, completely failed in Iran, but in most another countries it will inactive be effective, so it cannot be underestimated. Another very crucial component of American power is the ability to change governments and destabilise full regions of the world. Here we request to realise that the US is the heir to the British Empire. Britain was erstwhile a tool of the same structures, but in time a larger, stronger tool with more capabilities was needed. The U.S. fulfilled all the essential conditions. The first phase of the decision was to impose the US central bank institution in the form of national Reserve, the next stages were 2 planet wars. After the British Empire, the U.S. had fallen into the world's regions, which are practically "naturally" unstable. They're in many cases artificial. In the case of natural creations and countries that have won formal independency (e.g. India), specified delimitation of their borders has been ensured and hostile creations (e.g. Pakistan) have been created in the vicinity of hostile creations (e.g. Pakistan) so that conflicts can be easy brought into conflict if necessary. Practically the full mediate East was created on this principle. Conspiracy theories say Israel is the work of Zionists. This is bullshit! Israel is simply a British idea! The Zionists were only a tool at that time, but present they have grown stronger and are surely part of the structures! Campbell-Bannerman Report of 1907 he clearly says that in a region with immense energy resources (the mediate East), but inhabited by the people of the same culture and language (Arabs), there is simply a danger of creating 1 strong state entity that will control these resources. This cannot be allowed, and it is so essential to make a abroad entity that will permanently destabilize the area. This creature is Israel. The U.S. continues to benefit from British influence in this region. The U.S. is inactive an undisputed champion in all kinds of operations regime change, in organizing colorful revolutions, arabian springs and another methods, if not overthrowing uncomfortable governments, then at least destabilise countries and full regions. Neither Russia nor China can do this, and they do not have specified opportunities. This is an component of the U.S. power, which I think is far more crucial than military power. This and another elements soft power under no circumstances can you underestimate!!!
Reading this text and the erstwhile entry, many people are most likely smiling with pity now or knocking on their foreheads thinking, ‘ What is he doing here? ’ The U.S. cannot supply the planet with oil and gas! Of course they are not!!! But that's not the point! As usual, the old Roman maxim explains everything difference at impera Divide and conquer! Through this inability, the US has at least 3 benefits. Firstly, countries must compete in a price-based way, i.e. who will give more. Secondly, they must compete for the US. Thirdly, if they are forced to compete, they will not be able to communicate and make a common front against the US.
But let us go back to the articles mentioned at the outset. How to realize them? In the case of Culver, this is the cold opinion of an analyst who presents available data and compares the capabilities of the US and China. Anyone can draw their own conclusions. It's different with Kagan. Of course, I do not have the ability to read his thoughts, but it seems to me to be the text of a man whose planet may not have collapsed yet, but he suffered a large shock. I think, like many people in the United States, he lived a story of the power of the American army. Iran brought him down and the fall must have been painful. It seems he's been working on his analysis so far on the presumption that the American army is capable of enabling them to be carried out. But how did it look so far? any weak country was bombed, without a strong army, and if there was any, then anti-aircraft defenses (as in Venezuela) were excluded for the appropriate fee, then their puppets were installed and a large triumph was announced. In Iran, she hit a stone. A fewer days after the start of the operation, in the statements of American officials – with Trump at the head, there was a clear surprise that Iran had not yet fallen. seemingly these people were surviving in their information bubble, and they completely didn't realize what was going on. Martianov For many years now, he has been saying that American military men have absolutely no thought what the real war with the real enemy looks like. Nobody believed him so far...
What's next? Of course, I don't have a glass bullet, but I think the U.S. needs to effort to get their face back. It's likely to be any mass media action. I hope they won't be idiots and send ground troops to Iran. I truly want I had so many widows and orphans. surely the Gulf countries will be "earned" and "convinced" to guarantee that God's weapons do not include any non-aggression pacts or agreements with Iran. The war on Iran will surely not end, but I think it will become an increasingly tighter isolation of Iran and an effort to destruct this country economically. We will surely have the next phase of cutting off China's oil and LNG supply, which is the blockade of the Malakka Strait. Tankers headed for China, which managed to slip through the "lockblock", must flow through there. The United States is increasingly pushing Indonesia to make its airspace available to American aircraft. Indonesia, fearing U.S. duties, signed a very unfavorable deal for itself earlier this year, requiring it to acquisition US oil and gas for $15 billion a year. virtually a fewer hours after signing this contract, the U.S. ultimate Court ruled that these duties were illegal. This agreement means practically the bankruptcy of this country, and I fear Indonesia will get an offer that cannot be rejected and will yet agree to it. Although China was predictive and built in Myanmar, Burma, a port for oil tankers and a pipeline whose east oil is transported to China with the bypass of the Malakka Strait, any unusual coincidence arose in this country terrorists who inactive harm this pipeline...
But I fear the most interesting things will happen in Europe. May you live in interesting times... The force to end the war in Ukraine is expanding in Russia as shortly as possible. Will Putin always bend? I think he'll have to. I wonder what it'll look like. On May 14, Russia attacked Ukraine with over 1,500 drones. The most interesting thing is that alongside military targets, the mark of the attack was besides the facilities of American corporations specified as Cargill, Coca-Cola, Boeing, Mondelez and Philip Morris. No consequence from the United States. But the number of Ukrainian attacks is besides expanding not only on Russian oil installations, but besides on residential buildings. It is known that they would not be possible without external assistance. If Russian diplomats say it's playing with fire,
I am afraid that Russia will shortly perceive to the advice of Karaganov and individual to sober up “attended”. I wonder what country it'll be... I personally bet on Germany. Why am I convinced that Russia will yet be forced to intervene? Just read the celebrated plan Extending Russia RAND agency from 2019. All its points are step by step implemented. But this plan clearly states that a complete cut-off of Europe from Russian energy sources is only possible in the event of a war with Russia. There are already voices about the request to deal with Russia, Nord Stream It can inactive be repaired, many old pipelines inactive exist, resumption of supply is not a problem. Finally, social force can be so large that politicians will have no choice. This must be prevented. I am convinced that, as in Ukraine, there will be specified an escalation that Russia will have no choice but military intervention. Practically all Russian oil and gas transport infrastructure is in the vicinity of Petersburg. Just block the Gulf of Finland or the Danish Straits. And the goal will be achieved. And as usual Putin will be guilty and as usual the dark people will believe...
