“You have no idea, my son, how small wisdom this planet is ruled....”
Axel Oxenstierna
Post-election settlements in the Confederacy have aroused quite a few emotion in the Confederacy itself, but possibly even more among those who did not participate in the elections. Among the commentators of the alleged anti-system is the opinion that it was a mistake, on the 1 hand, to soften the transmission and to focus on the voters of the measure, on the another hand, that 2 considered extremist leaders were unnecessarily "schedule": Janusz Korwin Mikkego (JKM) and Grzegorz Braun.
According to critics, if the run leaders were the last, then the consequence would be better, due to the fact that the protest electorate would not stay home or vote for PJJ, or possibly even the consequence would be worse, but "we would know how many of us there are." specified assessments presume the existence of a protest electorate in Poland and so many that it would let his representation to enter parliament. Meanwhile, there is no specified electorate in this number. At least he's not seen in any manifestation, in any joint action. All the facts show that the only thing to number for is simply a possible miraculous unification of groups and circles of net admirers of leaders or storytellers, 3% of the vote and a fight for grants. However, specified unification would gotta take place and the elections and practice of fresh years have shown that with "anti-systemic" human resources, this is impossible not only due to the activity of the agency, but due to the low social, intellectual, ethical capital.
It is besides a complete misunderstanding to put both “storaged” leaders in 1 bag. While Grzegorz Braun, erstwhile he managed to scope the floor, actually raised issues that were crucial from the point of view of the possible electorate of the protest, namely pandemic issues, Ukrainianisation, the fight against the EU federalisation, JKM considered the eradication of public education and wellness services to be the most important. He was besides outraged at softening the demands of liquidation of the Social safety Office and income tax. Both public education and wellness care are bad according to the guru of Polish “freedom” due to the fact that they are remnants of socialism. The question is, do people who, since the spring of 2020, have protested first against the absurdities and pandemic terror, and then against Ukrainianization, actually dream of eliminating the Social safety Office, public wellness care and education?
Libertarian Manoeuvres
Is that even applicable to them? I don't think so, at least not for everyone, including the 1 signed below. JKM yes, he opposed the pandemic absurdities and showed a false pro-war propaganda, but they were never the main motives for his narrative. Instead, there was always more area in it for stories, and that is that teachers should be afraid of parents, and women should be deprived of active voting rights before menopause, and all in sauce, whose most crucial taste is always to fight socialism, whose father is not in JKM Marx and Lenin stories, but the old-fashioned chancellor Otto von Bismarck liable for introducing a modern insurance system. In addition, the state is only expected to defend claims of sacred private property, and low taxes, (preferably mainstream), must be allocated only to the military and police. This set of bizarre and untrue demands has nothing to do with any sensible altersystem. If a fewer reasonable sentences arise in specified an environment about freedom of treatment, the fight against censorship, they will only be compromised.
Grzegorz Braun seems at least at rhetoric level more responsive to actual threats. However, he besides at least at 1 point does not say what it is, or more specifically, does not say exactly. This is especially actual of the request to normalize relations with Russia and to argue Polish rusophobia, without which the conflict for its interests on the "German – EU Front" can only match the "demonstration with sabres" from J. Piłsudski's anecdotal message about what Poland can do in the event of simultaneous war in the east and west. Consequently, specified silence forces the Confederacy to support the construction of atomic power plants, i.e. to make Poland dependent on abroad natural materials, and above all not entirely safe – besides abroad technologies.
Throughout the Confederacy, there is besides an excessive emphasis on the function of entrepreneurs who perceive the salt of the earth. However, it is simply a circumstantial group and already not many, many Polish entrepreneurs employment immigrants, have become accustomed to searching for gaps in the Polish taxation system, but besides to utilizing their employees. In another words, the Confederacy rapidly identifies the mediate class with entrepreneurs, which definitely narrows down the mark group.
Meanwhile, Poles and Polish electorate are mostly workers and pensioners. For them, the demands for the liquidation of the Social safety Office and the determination of taxes as a state robbery of entrepreneurs sound not even abstract, but simply like the dangerous absurdity which they truly are. Many of them besides have in head or inactive experience bad treatment by Polish entrepreneurs, from paying wages under the table, to simple sweeping, where relations in Western corporations sometimes appear as a model of advanced culture of labour relations. All of this made the concept of mediate class frequently pejorative or at least ambiguous in Polish consciousness, which developed in 1990.
The Alliance of Extrems?
Professor Adam Wielomski in a very crucial way to specify the contemporary reality of the book “Alliance of Extremes in the Age of Globalisation" convincingly proved that in political sources of what is described present as the return of communism in the form of globalism lies the policy of specified right-wing idols as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. Moving on, he showed that besides the assumptions of ideologists of a kind Ludwig von Hayek or Friedrich von Mises treated as Oracles Polish “freedom” have a lot in common with the thought Charles Marx. applicable observations confirm these conclusions. In both systems, the monopoly is the culmination. In real socialism it was in practice a state monopoly implemented by the members of the nomenclature, in capitalism it is to be achieved by the smartest and most resourceful entrepreneur.
In globalism, both of these efforts have found their culmination in a hard to unravel interplay of interests. This combination of the power of large corporate oligopolies and political and administrative institutions acting for them illustrates the policy of the alleged rotary doors, consisting in the fact that the staff of both of these authorities exchange according to ad hoc needs. In the discreet back there are inactive the owners of the monopoly to make money. The origins of this convergence are seemingly different ideologies, but they have a lot in common in their deepest layers. Both take as their starting point that man is simply a rational being, guided by a reasonably narrow materialism, and above all both presume that the planet and the functioning of man in it can be explained, ba, even managed by social engineering based on 1 theory. This explanation is either monocausal or takes into account only measurable and logically related comparatively fewer factors. This presumption combines on the deepest level orthodoxes with left and right. Both those who appeal to equality oppressed by capitalist bloodsuckers proletarians and to freedom oppressed by state entrepreneurs.
It is always worth asking their supporters the question: whether they would like perfect communism or a model free market, in which everyone around them are bastards without reverence and religion or a terrible system, but having for the subjects of honest and healthy sense of neighbor. Communists answer that the communist being will form the angelic consciousness, and JKM that the weaker, and possibly the inferior will be eliminated through free competition. any and others thus deny reality, experience, sound sense, and simply say that man is simply a much more complex being than described by the most superb even theorists. That in addition to the request for freedom and competition there is simply a request for security, cooperation, goodness, that he needs both autonomy as an individual, but besides belonging, that his needs, tastes, consciousness are highly diverse and complicated, and that over the centuries, various civilizations have solved the problem of satisfying them in a very different way, although almost all protect, for example, the family.
Today, cognition of different civilizations, cultures, religions is so broad that the effort to adhere to 1 omnipotent explanation is doomed to intellectual and political failure. The answer to specified a cognitive – intellectual situation in the didactic is the attitude called “cherry – pick” consisting of the usage of various acquainted pedagogical teaching methods and techniques, depending on the time, place and needs of a peculiar individual or group, and sometimes the taste of a teacher. On the basis of politics, this means moving distant from the hard dogmas of the left and right to a conservative policy or more mundanely common sense. 1 that responds to circumstantial needs and threats here, now and tomorrow, as it says. Axel Gustafsson Oxenstierna Swedish Chancellor of the 17th century and who was the basis of politics until the last 2 centuries. It is this and only specified a post-conservative approach that can free our reasoning from being left-right utilizing a superb metaphor Tomasz Gabisia ‘Intellectual Gulag’.
For the electorate of protest, which is much better called the electorate of common sense, the problem is not the existence of a state wellness and education service or a ZUS or a Pitu, but the fact that a group of madmen decided to rebuild and control the planet in the name of completely false from the point of view of ecology, knowledge, discipline and from the ground of antihuman motives. Their power is paradoxically the consequence of the interaction of both "ideal" or dogmatic "right-wing freedomists" and equally "ideal" orphans after Marxism trying to find a place for themselves after the collapse of real socialism. It is their concrete moves that should find adequate countermeasures, and these should focus on the most basic and as specified recognised in our civilisation values and principles.
In this context, another crucial book entitled “Global Change. What we must defend and how to act.” Its author prof. Ryszard Zajęczkowski Synthetically, it presents basic points of support for opponents of “ideists” from Schwab and Harari. The value from which we should begin is the truth, meaning “the conformity of what is in our intellect, with the reality understood as the state of the world, which exists no substance how 1 knows and evaluates it.” George Orwell He'd say that it's going to last erstwhile you say 2 plus 2 equals four. Zajączkowski at the same time always emphasizes that fact is something difficult, for which the investigation requires work, training and adherence to principles of logic, intellectual integrity based on ego ambition, group force or material advantages. In this context, Józef Mackiewicz always raised the importance of free discussion and freedom of speech as the basic and ancient way of reaching out to the truth.
It is not, however, insisting on dogma grown by JKM followers or easy yielding to even easier absurdities preached by online showmen. The next point of the opposition of the defenders of civilization is, according to Zajączkowski, the natural law as principles of good life rooted in human nature, in our civilisation having reflection, among another things, in the principles of Roman law and yet having its Christian roots of dignity of the human person, softening the harshness and cruelty of this world, possibly the most separate feature of our western civilization.
Both Wielomski and Zajączkowski in politics opt to stay with the national state (as Wielomski writes) for this "institutionalized form of concern for the own interests of a group of people called the nation, i.e. having a strong identity of distinctness towards another peoples besides having their own identity, language, culture and history." ) Both authors besides place a strong emphasis on defending the existence of the mediate class as a layer of people with a crucial degree of material independency and self-confidence, and in this day and age it does not should be just entrepreneurs. This point besides shows that opposition to the WEF's globalist gang refers not to the left or right, but to the old civilization of truths and principles preached by Aristotle.
Dictatorship 2.0
It is characteristic that opposition to the criminal absurdities imposed on people during the alleged pandemic posed the most decisively different states as Sweden and Belarus, as well as the American states of Texas and Florida. Similarly, the issue of opposition to Ukrainianization, which is opposed in Poland by the freedom right of Grzegorz Braun as well as the environment of “Polish Thought” that is reluctant as an end-communist. On the another hand, among the most zealous executives of orders from WHO or Davos were left-wing governments, Chinese government and governments of countries previously considered liberal. In Poland the most murderous turned out to be the alleged left and the belief of the freedom of the body, which abruptly turned out to be dangerous to the environment. All over the planet and in Poland, individual doctors, scholars, celebrities, politicians and journalists resisted from very different political banners. The determinant was the discord to lie, absurdity, and regulation of freedom. With this consent to lie and suppressing free debate, they were a reflection of the problem. Restrictions on physical freedom were the consequence of agreeing to lie and a means to bring about dictatorship of the darkened 2.0. This time the darkrooms were equipped with professorial titles, utilized an expert new-word, and human consciousness terrorized with the usage of alleged belief in science, while truly technological was in this era only sociotechnical.
The opposition to supporting the war in Ukraine has besides been resisting so far in Europe ruled by the nominal right-wing Hungary and the recently owned left-wing Slovak government. According to conventional divisions, the German AfD's very different shades of narration are besides based not on the fight against the insurance strategy or income tax, but on the stigma of absurd climateism and pro-war politics subordinate to American interests. The same only in a somewhat different speech is presented by leftist Sahra Wagenknecht. With tiny exceptions, all these formations and individuals had a akin critical attitude towards the absurd and "pandemic" terror.
All this confirms that the line of opposition only adequate to the nature of the war which is waged by civilization and humanity, globalists in today's world, is to focus on the simplest principles and values of our civilisation, without divisions on modern, frequently intellectually impressive, but indeed imagined ideological schemes and structures. specified reasoning appeared in Poland in 1990. Wojciech Giełżyński wrote about the 3rd road, the undersigned of the ‘new strategy and the same values’, Marek Glogoczowski ‘Ethos of mindlessness’ and Mateusz Piskorski contains an ‘extreme soy’. Today, the effort to return to this approach is the Kraków Declaration of "16 Postulates". The attacks on the WTC and the alleged war on terror, the taking over and scolding by globalists of the ecological movement, another more or little staged crises and military operations, on the 1 hand, made people no longer appreciate and recognise the importance of deeper reflection, and on the another hand (still the same) the fresh strategy more effectively fought free thought, not only through censorship, but besides through increasingly improved techniques of diverting attention from crucial issues, which was facilitated by the emergence of fresh technologies, primarily carried before the eyes of smartphones. Thus, how popular among anti-system activists after the outbreak of the "pandemic" call for alleged awakening, did not find either a consequence or adequate intellectual ground, which means that the "waking" “anti-systemists” frequently take people whose main qualification is the ability to gather large audiences in the net media, or to empathize with ostentatious devolution.
The Polish elector according to all sociological investigation is neither inclined to believe in abstract doctrines nor "right" in his economical beliefs. More frequently than Westerners vote not on the basis of economical interests, but more in an identity way, although in this case, for example, he does not take Catholic religion rules besides seriously and as he noted Krzysztof Budziakowski is holy water only of the clearings, but it flows on it a bit like water for geese. It is akin with the Polish belongings of civilization, at least real, not declared. In the present situation, specified a deficiency of attachment to dogmas may not necessarily be a reason for complexes. We request not a left-wing or right-wing program, but above all a fair answer to the question of where we will get energy, food, natural materials, how we will heal, learn whether we will have our currency, cash, whether we want to defend freedom of speech and make sentences in court not arouse outrage or a grim grotesque impression. Whether we want to have healthy, many families rooted in local communities, or the world's inscrutable individuals surviving without obligations, but without the roots needed in times of historical and life storms.
Whether and why we want to have Poland as a large common home, or whether we like to melt in the larger east or western sea, or possibly in the Central European one. The modern Pole of our time must besides not forget the papal call to request of himself, even erstwhile others do not require of us, interestingly enough, the same preaching Aldous Huxley as an antidote to the reality of the fresh planet described by him. This applies to both everyday habits and ethics in collective actions, during our functioning in institutions, parties, associations. Only erstwhile we do these lessons, erstwhile we find honest answers to the above questions, will we have the chance to have a real self-determination and to decide how to realise the Polish national interest.
Olaf Swolkień
photo profile of Confederate fb
Think Poland, No. 49-50 (3-10.12.2023)
