When addressing areas of clean transport or alleged 15-minute cities, we should realise that the arguments, whatever they may be, do not have the slightest impact on those groups that have decided to make us happy at all costs.
These are people convinced of their splendor, infallibility and feeling called to us, “ordinary people” to give life. So that as an answer to the most sublime argument we will hear obligatory: “We do not have your coat....” This is not a very optimistic vision, but I do not think that the situation is hopeless.
The SCT task or 15 minute cities is implemented in the same way as another projects of this group are implemented. 1 can besides usage a view frequently repeated by Stanisław Michalkiewicz, which reads: Communism heroically fought against the problems which he first created. According to the same maxim, a group of our “heroes” is besides operating. As long as the game was all about money, it was transparent. They assumed that they wanted to “earn” adequate and so much, they chose the industry, prepared conditions, public opinion, and redirected taxpayers' (public) money into appropriate channels. Whether they were arms companies, pharmaceutical companies or the alleged construction manufacture or another, this was contingent on the anticipation of earning. On the “end” chain, after which money followed in each of the above-mentioned industries, but many others are besides the same people (or the same companies as anyone would like). Ernst Wolff developed the subject very well in his last book entitled planet economical Forum: die Weltmacht im Hintergrund. Half of this book are names and addresses of companies along with their “owners”. It is clear from these statements that behind any action that reconciles either our freedom, wellness or "bay" there are powerful financial companies, which in turn are mostly in the hands of the old and fresh planet oligarchy.
The problems in traffic with which I have been confronted for 80 years have forced me to reflect on the meaning of many phenomena that at first glance seemed stupid and illogical to me.
With all the "back of the head" ideas on how to improve and improve it. I come from the presumption that in order to fix anything you gotta first realize how it works and what it was caused. It became clear rather rapidly that there is no golden measurement that could even alleviate the problems of the planet today. besides many opposing interests frequently stand in the way of noble intentions. But you can effort to "partially" change the parameters.
Traffic is the main problem in cities. The problem of parking lots is important, especially in downtown areas. Next in line is the exhaust gas, the noise, and let's call it a "brave" ride.
It is not hard to announcement that alleged traffic jams form most frequently in the time erstwhile people go to work or return from work. besides events specified as concerts of celebrated artists, matches or sports competitions make a density of vehicles on circumstantial routes. However, the second can be classified as sporadic phenomena.
Recently created industrial zones, by concentrating large numbers of workers in 1 place, contribute twice a day to congestion of cities.
I spent my childhood on a settlement built especially for miners from a close mine. They had 2-4 km to work, and over the hill, on ft even closer.
This, in my opinion, shows that the building decision makers were logical and reasonable. surely they had their own advantages in the first place, but it was besides their wisdom that they noticed the dependence of society. They knew that in order to "exploit" the worker, or to make his work as efficient as possible, they besides had to take care of appropriate rest. And in this case, the time that specified an worker would gotta spend to get to or get to the workplace, if it was reduced to a minimum, will consequence in a healthier or more efficient worker.
Today, these “profits” are divided by another key. So that even this "use" is not noticed. That's why I wrote at the beginning of this text about conflicting interests. Fuel manufacturers are curious in selling it. So their lobby will surely not advance fuel-saving cars. They'd alternatively prevent it. Who do you think stopped production of VW XL1?
The company has been working on this since 2002. 10 years of work thrown in the trash?
In order to sale as many vehicles as possible, manufacturers gotta balance the line of fraud. all logically reasoning man knows what factors should decide how to build cars. The most crucial thing for me is fuel consumption, steering and brakes, sound inside the car, but besides the 1 that “produced”. Field of view and ergonomic seats.
The fact that, for example, fuel consumption is the consequence of solutions that affect the weight of the car or its acceleration and maximum velocity is alternatively logical. I so consider it essential to have a social discussion on the subjects mentioned above.
I mean, do we consider vehicles a tool or an ornament or a gun?
Or, as has late been the case, for the means of control, the TRESURA, and forcing us to behave and buy things that we do not necessarily want?
I've lived in a vicinity for the last 40 years, which, by my character, would have been eligible for... 15 minutes. territory with an area of 4,22 sq mi. with 60 1000 inhabitants. Within a 2 km radius, there's fundamentally everything an average individual needs to live. If you have a place of work here, you can actually spend your full life without always leaving this district. I haven't owned a car in years, due to the fact that I've been completely unseemly. I bought a car erstwhile after years of emigration I was allowed to go to Poland again. This decision was due to pure economics. If the calculation found that car rental was a better solution, I would have chosen this option.
For many people, a car is simply a necessity, but for a certain group only “a flower for a goat”. It is an effort to combat feelings of undervalue and the request for "existence". And these phenomena, unfortunately frequent in all society, are ruthlessly and deliberately utilized by car companies. I've never heard any discussion on akin subjects. It is apparent that psychology, doctrine and, for example, issues related to law, the model of society or even intellectual wellness are involved.
delight note, in the above, the word “necessity”. In this, the hypocrisy of “the graces of our rulers” is closed. For them, it is not reasonable and logical to solve problems. So they're for everyone's benefit. In their proposals, these 15 minute cities are any kind of prison. Where we'll be under full control.
We. They don't.
So the thought of 15 is simply a minute town, provided that logic and reasonableness are taken into account in designing such, or rebuilding existing structures, I consider it at least worthy of discussion. Rejecting the "globalistic" version with all certainty.
And so “quickly”: you can improve the traffic situation by moving the hours of starting and finishing work in subsequent companies in the alleged economical zones.
To coordinate this step with another activities specified as the request to receive a kid from school or kindergarten, I think it would be possible to ask AI today.
The changes I propose to begin to correct the situation:
1. erstwhile designing or rebuilding cities (diversaries) take account of occupation creation in terms of distance from the residence of employees. Or building fresh jobs as it utilized to be. Build settlements nearby, at least for any employees.
2. utilizing the latest technologies, i.e. artificial intelligence, optimize the time to start and finish work, the time to open and close shops, offices, schools, kindergartens. Taking into account the quantity, kind of vehicles and taking into account the above factors, establish the control of the light signal so as to minimise the adverse effects present today. I mean the density of vehicles in time and place, called the cork.
3. If you do not manage to accomplish patented solutions, “closed in drawers” make new, logical and reasonable projects aimed at energy savings, wellness protection, real environmental protection.
4. In the general discussion, establish standards for those means of transport which affect the emergence of problematic phenomena.
5. Training modules. Simulators.
ad1 and 2.
These 2 points relate primarily to the problem of MAINTENANCE.
ad3
The construction of vehicles that will aim to save fuel, ease of operation and repair of vehicles, protection of the environment and, of course, our health.
ad4
This is about the size (width above all) of vehicles. This involves street design, parking lots, surface wear. Transport of goods and people. circumstantial proposals at your disposal. I don't want to bring this text to infinity right now.
ad5
Driver behaviour can be trained. Already knowing that there is simply a camera in each car recording the driver's behaviour (speed, gap) and another traffic participants will force you to self-control. This subject needs to be discussed, due to the fact that it is not about putting a muzzle on anyone.
The usage of driving simulators with concrete examples of road accidents in the driving learning process will save time to learn on the street. So little exhaust, little vehicles on the road. And the anticipation of creating a fresh branch of production. If computer games with examples of driving are already possible, manufacturing on a akin profile of professional equipment is no longer a problem.
It is apparent that no 1 alone can do it. At a conference I called for the creation of a car club akin to the existing ADAC in Germany. This ADAC in the first version. The word is independent of politics and finance. It is now more of a publicity tube of government ideas than a defender of vehicle owners. Absolutely NOONE in Poland was curious in the subject.
In Poland existing However, two institutions likely to lead to specified or akin solutions. As far as I know, LOK and PeZetMot They deal with akin subjects. Unfortunately, I do not know how much these institutions are INDEPENDENT. And it's crucial that LOGIC AND EXPLOSION The sick ideologies proclaimed by the smart guys who wanted to "make money" won.
I would like to conclude on this subject of clean transport zones, although I absolutely do not consider the subject exhausted. I inactive have quite a few concrete ideas.
Nothing happens by accident. All the events around us make sense. I have the impression that the art of life is to be able to announcement it, interpret it decently and respond if necessary. You can tell whether I have been able to “do my homework”. Thank you for having decided to read these elaborates. I want I could make things better for all of us. As I do not see any comments here, I would like to ask your opinion or circumstantial proposals on this matter. I don't think of myself as an alpha and omega, and I know that confusing people is simply a human thing. That's why I'd appreciate a reaction. Even if she's negative to me. We've been studying all our lives. My message for correspondence with you; [email protected]
PS. Photos for the first 2 parts I chose to show the hypocrisy of those who pretend to be “our saviors”. someway they deficiency courage in this peculiar subject. (j)
