The Problem of Blame in technological Unreliability
on the recitals to the ‘Gorgon case’
In a scandalous _ for all luck_ Gorgon’s case ‘Poles' own portrait’ the problem of guilt for technological failure is raised, as usual a problem placed on the head, which, as you can see from this case, is very frequently flawed, especially erstwhile it is simply a professorial head. It would be appropriate not to usage specified heads and to take on the problem of guilt autonomously and logically. The blame for the study is largely, or even entirely, artificial intelligence, which, as the prof. emphasized, suffered hallucinations. In practice, however, we do not know how to usage AI erstwhile creating the report. And it's just a tool. If any wanker uses a hammer so that alternatively of a stone he'll break his knee, it's clear he's guilty, not a hammer.
The author of the study is not AI, but an image prof. – Barbara Mroz–Gorgon, who created her image of this task herself. If any outline of the study submitted AI to the editorial/processing/ improvement and the outline/content was as gibberish as the professor's public statements, it is apparent that AI may have had hallucinations.
Except... ‘halucination’ AI does not release a individual from responsibility. Rather, it shows that a individual should know what he does, what he uses, and what he yet signs his own name.
To usage artificial intelligence, you gotta have your own natural intelligence!
I have any experience with AI and I urge any books from the -AI cycle to my books (self-project without funding!) available on academia.edu.
. AI to the XI commandment
]]>https://www.academia.edu/145492176/AI_wz_XI_commandments]]>;
Academic plagues in A-I-I ]]>https://www.cademia.edu/144426561/PLAGI_AKADEMICA_W_UJ%C4%98CIU_AI]]>
ACADEMIC PLAYS IN AI II ]]>https://www.cademia.edu/144610366/PLAGI_AKADEMICA_W_UJ%C4%98CIU_AI_II,]]>
AI towards the book “Treasure in the Palace of Science” – available online on academia.edu
And a fewer texts depicting the AI's reaction to my texts were included in the last book “From the Academic Void” showing that our academic planet is in the abyss at the visible end of civilization.]]> https://blogjw.wordpress.com/from-academic-otchlani/]]>. This is simply a image of the Polish academic community drawn by hundreds of my texts (video ]]>https://blogjw.wordpress.com]]>';]]> https://blogjw.wordpress.com/plagi-academic/]]>; ]]>https://blogjw.wordpress.com/trad-w-palac-science/]]>
Hallucinations towards my AI texts, so far, have not been received. On the another hand, natural intelligence has not yet revealed its opinions, nor — even more interesting — its hallucinations after reading these texts.
The ‘Gorgonian case’, media-based and politically-based, is not an isolated case. There are cases of academic infidelity, which, in public space, and especially academic space, are seemingly not wanted. 1 of them is the case of Bogusław Sliwerski.
Professor—and this is simply a prof. from the very top of the academic hierarchy, a associate of the highest Polish academic body, the Council of technological Excellence—he responded to my Plagiars academic text, which he called "reviews" and was a individual hate, a pack of bullshit and lies—of claims that could be verified without much difficulty. As specified a wise student, and even a advanced school student, he should easy see that this is not a factual review, but a text with a grudge against the author.
Bełkot has been accepted by the remaining most excellent of excellent professors, with an organ of technological excellence and an academic press organ (Academic Forum) and its experts popularizing these fashionable in academic circles nonsense.]]> https://blogjw.wordpress.com/2024/01/08/case-plagiatu-boguslaw-sliwerski-in-editation-month-forum-academic/]]>
Moreover, the said perfect man, as a follower of the 11th commandment [do not be indifferent—]]> https://blogjw.wordpress.com/xi-command/]]>] did not stay indifferent to my intellectual property and although final court judgments showed that he violated my copyrights, the 1 on Ash Wednesday - as he reported on the blog - sprinkled his head with ash not for his faults, but for the 1 who did not inform him/teach him how to proceed – to respect copyrights ! which, of course, as an excellent and in addition, the guru of educators prof. dr. hab. d hc.multi did not know!
As if there was little, right, substantive, and court-martially confirmed, the allegations of copyright infringement found revenge to be his critical review (sic!) Self-criticism didn't show. He has not resigned and no academic body wants to dismiss him Ministerial – too.
And the question is: Can individual as imperfect as I — a man who according to academic standards is unfit for life in the academic domain — in any way perfect individual who is considered perfect? The finest of our professors has not explained this to me. Are they out of natural intelligence? They didn't turn to fake? Or were they afraid that artificial intelligence would get “halucination”? Or — what would be more dangerous — that he might have a different opinion? Especially since I have already revealed that AI can have a different opinion from academic authorities: AI reviews the review of prof. dr. h.c. multi Bogusław Sliwerski
But As it were, I was obliged to perfect the perfect due to the fact that I was found guilty of perfecting the perfect (sic!). So I have nothing left but to perfect even the most perfect academic body! Otherwise, my responsibility will be obvious. Life!
Recently, before the general gathering of the Polish Academy of Sciences, which was to deal with the substance of her “perfect” husband, she was afraid about the state of Polish discipline GazWyb prepared a text supporting its imperfections. It may seem that this congregation has besides enlightened itself so that its intelligence has not been used. It is not known whether the assembled have it.
The Gorgoniova case so remains work in progress. So I look forward to the next “power speedes” of professors, or possibly even professors of belveders. An image prof. is, according to the academic nomenclature, a prof. of the “court”. She said she had already given about 20 "power speedes". It is not known, however, how many "power speeds" must be given in order to become a Belgian professor.
After the last power speed, however, the image prof. lost power. Will he get it back? Maybe. Worse with the image — this 1 has already been lost.
