Strong — because it was us Poles in the majority, we were always ready to rip off and we, who, after 123 years of imprisonment of our country, were able to recover them.
Also strong in our top natural resources in Europe, to which our enemies have blocked our access for years.
And besides strong in excellent agriculture and our farmers who produce food at the highest global level.
Powerless —because we were told that now we Poles are sovereign in this democracy; that we rule, we have power over what is happening in the country. Bullshit. In our naivety and foolishness in not distinguishing fact from evil and lies, we allowed for the full 34 years to regulation politicians, of which just a fistful were honest patriots. The rest, unfortunately, are greedy, primitive people who went to politics only to gain profits for themselves and nothing good for the remainder of the nation. And they're not competent; they're smart, not smart. The consequence – We have no impact.
What a paradox, a culturally young intellectual will say. What rubbish, what nonsense, will find a typical twisted man on the street.
That is the case – we Poles can be strong and unfortunately besides powerless.
Which countries that were after the war in the clutches of Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, had as many national spurs as we – Poland?
This large rally in 1980, erstwhile 10 million Poles created Solidarity, is an crucial moment, not only recorded in the past of Poland, but in the past of the world, as a breakthrough of civilization, affecting the destiny of history.
But shortly after these moments of show of strength, the awakening of pride and dignity of the nation, a time of powerlessness happens regularly and quickly. We can't turn triumph into something good for us. Why?
The case is simple. We missed a leader all time.
Someone who thinks logically, but rapidly and simply, can say, "Why do we request leaders? As long as we have democracy and we, citizens, are sovereign in the state, we can manage ourselves. We can hold meetings, debates and referendums. We can't usage any leaders. The state only needs a manager or a manager who will run a state device so that it does not break down. But crucial decisions will be made only by us – the nation.
Well, you can't do that. It's utopian thinking, like the communist shouting, that we're all equal, so we're besides equal on the level of prosperity, due to the fact that we have the same belly.
It's clear that I'm not talking about any abstract theoretical debate.
It's a specific, crucial problem. The Republic, not the first time it found itself in a critical and very dangerous minute in history.
The country's power was taken over by counterparts of invaders whose main and sole intent is to destruct the state. The rulers don't build anything, just step by step, a classical way of barbarians, demolishing it so as to bring it to the level of incapacitation, helplessness and as a consequence of the transition to the protection of states, or "civilized" structures.
They took over the power in a quasi-democratic way, due to the fact that we know that in the electoral process we had many frauds and dishonesty – to the degree that in a democratic or Republican state, standing on strong ethical and legal foundations, October 2023 elections would be nullified and repeated.
Unfortunately, the erstwhile authority of the United Right in its carelessness, conviction of the support of the nation, and, in truth, full of pride and impudence, has contributed greatly to its own defeat, ignoring the danger of the power of the destroyers, who, in all demonstrated lawlessness, reject entirely the principles of sovereignty, patriotism and the welfare of citizens.
That's why I compose that we request a leader present to rape.
Not the leader of any group, any rebellion, or even counter-revolution, but the leader of the takeover and construction of the state. Our community for millennia.
Why and why must we find a leader?
Because that's the nature of man! The nature of all individual surviving in a community. And, of course, at the highest Community level created, which is its own state.
People request leadership for a number of reasons, arising from both individual psychology and social dynamics.
People request a leader instinctively and internally for respective deep, intellectual and evolutionary reasons:
1. Evolutionary Roots
Survival: In the past, our ancestors lived in groups where effective leadership was crucial to survival. A good leader could organize a defence against predators, coordinate hunting and manage resources. Groups with effective leaders had a better chance of surviving.
Natural selection: The instinctive search for leadership may have been beneficial from the position of natural selection. Those who accepted leadership had better chances of endurance and reproduction, passing their genes on.
2. Social hierarchy
Social structure: Most social animals, including humans, function in hierarchical structures. Leaders play a key function in maintaining order and structure in the group. This hierarchical organization minimizes conflicts and increases the efficiency of the group.
Safety and stability: The instinctive request for leadership is besides due to the search for safety and stability. In groups with a clear leadership structure, members can feel more safe and protected.
3. The request for guidance and guidance
Uncertainty reduction: People have a natural request to reduce uncertainty and search guidance. Leaders supply guidance and aid to realize the planet around them, reducing anxiety and stress associated with uncertainty.
Cognitive simplification: Leaders can aid to process complex information and decision making, which is beneficial from the position of limited cognitive resources of the individual.
4. The request to belong and identify
Group identity: People have a natural request to belong to a group and identify with its values and objectives. Leaders frequently personify group values and aid build group identity.
Community and solidarity: Leadership strengthens the sense of community and solidarity within the group, which is essential to the intellectual and social wellness of individuals.
5. Psychological aspects of leadership
Following the pattern: People tend to follow those who consider themselves competent, charismatic or authoritative. These qualities of leaders can instinctively inspire trust and respect.
Socialisation mechanisms: From an early age, we have been socialized to accept and respect authority, which strengthens our instinctive request to search leadership.
In summary, the instinctive request for leadership in people has its roots in evolution, social structure, simplification of uncertainty, the request for belonging and socialisation mechanisms. Leaders play a key function in ensuring the survival, security, order, group identity and efficiency of the group.
As it seems to me, I have proved that all man on his own, as well as any social organization, whether family, historical tribes, nations, cultures and states, in order to be able to act for the good of all, specified a leader must have. And I will add – 1 man to whom we will all trust that he is able – and as best as possible – to act for our common and individual good.
History has proved to us that erstwhile there are 2 leaders at the same time, or a triumvirate or even a larger leadership team, that is not good. There are differences of opinion, then disagreement, and this leads to negative effects.
All right. We already know what we want and what we request virtually present to save ourselves. Yes – to save. For they will take distant my identity, take distant my belonging to a arrogant nation; they will make me a grandfather, a pauper hanging from the door handle of our enemies. They'll take distant my future.
Anyone today, right now, see a good candidate for the national leader of the Republic?
I'll admit I'm inactive looking. And it's been a long time.
When I look for not only our, but besides the world's public, the most crucial historically of our national leaders, it receives specified results:
1. Józef Piłsudski (1867–1935)
Achievements: The Chief of State, the creator of the reborn Poland after 123 years of occupation. He was a key leader in the Polish-bolshevik War, commanding in the conflict of Warsaw in 1920.
Impact: As the creator of the Second Republic and later Marshal of Poland, Piłsudski had a immense influence on policy and military development.
2. Casimir the large (1310–1370)
Achievements: King of Poland, last of the Piast dynasty. He reformed the administration, introduced codification of the law (Wislicki Statutes), founded the Krakow Academy (later Jagiellonian University).
Impact: During his reign Poland became a strong and well-managed state. It has greatly developed the country's economy and infrastructure.
3. Jan III Sobieski (1629–1696)
Achievements: The King of Poland, primarily known for winning the conflict of Vienna in 1683, where he defeated the Ottoman army.
Impact: He defended Europe from the Ottoman invasion, gaining global designation and strengthening Poland's global position.
4. Lech Walesa (1943–)
Achievements: The leader of the Solidarity movement, which played a key function in overthrowing communism in Poland. Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1983.
Impact: The first democratically elected president of the III Republic. His actions contributed to the collapse of communism in Central and east Europe.
5. Władysław Jagiełło (1352–1434)
Achievements: The Grand Duke of Lithuania, and then the King of Poland after the establishment of a individual union between Poland and Lithuania (Union of Blood, 1385). He won the conflict of Grunwald in 1410, defeating the Teutonic Order.
Impact:His regulation strengthened the Polish-Lithuanian alliance and contributed to the golden age of Poland. His policy guaranteed Poland and Lithuania long-term stableness and development.
Let me add: this is the position of the world's general opinion. I'm sorry there are many historians and scientists in this.
We Poles (although inactive not all of us) unfortunately are embarrassed, due to the fact that Lech Walesa, the nickname Bolek, manufactured us peculiar services in Bolsheviks. We got fooled like kids.
It is besides worth remembering, and any only remind us, why mostly a good leader of the state and nation must be. What are its essential functions, duties and tasks. This is:
1. The request for Structure and Order
Organisation and coordination: Leaders aid organise group activities, coordinate tasks and set targets. Without a leader, the group may have difficulty achieving a common goal.
Clarity and Direction: Leaders set the direction of action and aid the group focus on circumstantial objectives. They give clear guidelines that aid avoid chaos and disorganization.
2. Decision-making
Efficiency: Leaders frequently make decisions on behalf of the group, which increases efficiency. Without a leader, decision-making can be slow and ineffective.
Liability: The leader takes work for decisions, which can reduce stress and uncertainty among members of the group.
3. Motivation and Inspiration
Motivation A good leader can motivate the group, inspire its members and encourage better results.
Vision: Leaders frequently have a imagination of the future that inspires others to act and gives them a sense of purpose.
4. Conflict resolution
Mediation: Leaders act as mediators in case of intra-group conflicts, helping resolve disputes and keep harmony.
Justice: Leaders can besides supply justice and equality in the group by enforcing rules and regulations.
5. Social request for hierarchy
Evolutionary Basis: From an evolutionary position people are accustomed to surviving in hierarchical structures. Leaders play a function in the natural social hierarchy, which can supply a sense of safety and stability.
Community sense: The leader helps unite the group, strengthening the sense of community and belonging.
6. Culture and tradition
Social standards: In many cultures there is simply a tradition of strong leadership that shapes the expectations and behaviour of people in society.
Cultural patterns: Leader characters are frequently function models, which form values and norms in a given culture.
The request for a leader stems from a combination of psychological, social and cultural factors. Leaders aid organize and manage the group's activities, make decisions, motivate and inspire members of the group, solve conflicts and supply structure and order. Thanks to them, groups and societies can act effectively and harmoniously.
My perfect since childhood is Marshal Józef Piłsudski. Grandpa Kazimierz, my mother's father, was a legionary. This most likely besides affected the boy who created a legendary hero and savior from the marshal. The communists of PRLu, and then after the transformation dyed foxes, which in 1 day turned into "real democrats" notoriously disgusted, and even falsified the communicative of Piłsudski's role. We were expected to think incorrect about him. due to the fact that he must be specified a monster bastard the man who humiliated Stalin and won the war with him. As for today, it is simply a burning thrill, as we hear from Putin – the factoryman of the fresh reality and past of the world. It had specified an impact on the opinion, especially this fresh intelligence, that the real hero of the Second Polish Republic was actually Dmowski. Was it due to the fact that he recommended a relationship with the USSR? Even specified a thinker and creator as Rafał Ziemkiewicz fell into this trap of evil views, who frequently likes to gnaw as he is simply a marshal despised. I'm looking around present and trying to find a candidate for our leader. How about Beata Szydło? That would be a large president. Unfortunately, not the leader. associate of the ex-minister Przemysław Czarnek? Almost, almost a good candidate for me. But his charisma is that he makes more enemies than friends and supporters. How about Christopher Bosak? A wise man, worthy of respect, but... no. A strong warrior and a tough character. But it's besides establishmental. He can't pull consecutive people. besides bad. I like him. It's just not about liking someone, it's about critically assessing them. There was Margaret Thacher), and he has to do everything he can to buy us.
We gotta act. It'll be besides late. Will we, the patriots, as we utilized to be nobles on the seymites, and in these days, right-wing politicians, with emphasis on the PiSu, we will only talk, argue, calculate, look at the president and wait... wait...
Appendix
I think a supplement like that might be interesting. Here's something in my Creserche that I've managed to get. It's worth knowing the world's public. And as always, we have our opinions.
The 10 top Leaders in Human History
The evaluation of the top leaders in human past is subjective and may depend on various criteria, specified as impact on history, leadership capabilities, achievements, and moral aspects of their actions. These are the 10 leaders who are frequently considered the top due to their tremendous influence on the world:
1. Alexander the large (356–323 BC)
Achievements: King of Macedonia, creator of 1 of the top empires in history. He conquered Persia, Egypt and part of India.
Impact: The spread of Greek culture, the establishment of many cities, including Alexandria.
2. Julius Caesar (100–44 BC)
Achievements: A Roman general and politician who importantly contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic and the establishment of the Roman Empire.
Impact: Social reforms and the Julian calendar.
3. August (63 B.C.E.–14 C.E.)
Achievements: The first Emperor of Rome to initiate Pax Roman (Roman peace).
Impact: The stableness and expansion of the Roman Empire.
4. Jingis-chan (1162–1227)
Achievements: The creator of the Mongol Empire, the largest land empire in history.
Impact: Reunification of Mongolian tribes, impact on trade and communication between East and West.
5. Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821)
Achievements: A French general and emperor who won a large part of Europe.
Impact: Legal reforms ( Napoleon Code), modernisation of administration.
6. George Washington (1732–1799)
Achievements: First president of the United States, Commander of the Continental Army during the War of Independence.
Impact: Shaping the foundations of American democracy.
7. Mahatma Gandhi (1869–1948)
Achievements: Leader of India's independency movement, creator of non-violence doctrine (ahimsa).
Impact: Inspiration for civilian rights movements worldwide.
8. Winston Churchill (1874–1965)
Achievements: Prime Minister of large Britain during planet War II, a key figure in the Allied coalition.
Impact: Motivation of the British people, participation in shaping the postwar planet order.
9. Nelson Mandela (1918–2013)
Achievements: South Africa's first black president, leader of the fight against apartheid.
Impact: National reconciliation and democratisation of South Africa.
10. Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
Achievements: The 16th president of the United States, led the country through the civilian War, abolished slavery.
Impact: Maintaining U.S. unity, emancipating slaves.
Summary
Each of these leaders had a immense influence on the past of the world. Their actions, both military, political and social, shaped the destiny of nations and had a lasting impact on the improvement of civilization.
The assessment of the worst leaders in the planet is simply a hard task, but any leaders are widely regarded as highly harmful due to their actions that have caused immense suffering, demolition and death. Here are 5 of them who are frequently considered the worst:
1. Adolf Hitler (1889–1945)
Achievements: Dictator of Nazi Germany, which led to the outbreak of planet War II.
Crimes: liable for the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered, and for the deaths of millions of others as a consequence of war and extermination policy.
2. Joseph Stalin (1878–1953)
Achievements: The leader of the russian Union who turned the country into an industrial and military power.
Crimes: liable for large cleansings, gulags, collectivization policies and famine in Ukraine (Great Hunger), which together caused millions of deaths.
3. Mao Zedong (1893–1976)
Achievements: president of the Communist organization of China, which brought China to the way of the Communist Revolution.
Crimes: His policies of the large Jump Forward and Cultural Revolution caused tens of millions of people to die due to hunger, repression and violence.
4. Pol Pot (1925–1998)
Achievements: Leader of the Red Khmer and Prime Minister of Democratic Kampucha.
Crimes: His government in 1975-1979 led to the death of about 1.7-2 million people as a consequence of executions, forced labour, hunger and disease.
5. Idi Amin (1925–2003)
Achievements: Ugandan president from 1971 to 1979.
Crimes: His violent government was characterized by mass murder, torture and political persecution. It is estimated that his regulation led to the death of about 300,000 people.
Summary
These leaders are frequently considered the worst in past due to the scale of crime, suffering and demolition they have caused. Their actions had disastrous effects on millions of people and left a lasting mark on planet history.
