Sexeducation alternatively of mathematics and Polish?

A real disaster is happening in humanities. It is adequate to briefly read the Ministry's proposals to see that the deleted subjects are not accidental, but are aimed at alienating young Poles from national past and culture.

However, not all classes are to be "weaned". Part of the time taken from the lessons of mathematics, Polish and past of children are to devote to... vulgar sexual education.

The school “reformed” by the minister Barbara Nowacka, known for its aboriginal activity, would be omitted or truncated, among another things, about the Polish conflict with the German Empire, Polish-Cruck wars, the bar confederation, the Wielkopolska uprising, the Silesian uprisings, the defence of Poland against the Nazi attacks Germany in 1939, killing Poles by German and russian occupiers, saving Jews by Poles during planet War II, or fighting the “Cursed Soldiers” with the Soviets.

Among the goals of teaching history, the pursuit of “a feeling of love for the homeland by respect and attachment to the tradition and past of the nation and its achievements, culture and native language” is to be removed. The Ministry wants to remove from the list of readings of the fewer works of St John Paul II and Blessed Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński, remove the subjects concerning the persecution of the Church during the Stalinist period or mention of the figure of St Maximilian Kolbe.

By opposing the ideas of Minister Nowacka – in cooperation with many experts and organizations specialising in the education strategy – we have developed an analysis on the proposals for changes in the programming basis, which we have passed on to the Ministry and made public in the media.

Resort changes to the school programme were summarised by experts as:

- depolonization

- dechristianization

- dehumanization

- depravation

- the degradation of the full education system.

These changes, combined with the announced elimination of home work, will lead to a simplification in the level of teaching, resulting in a drastic simplification in the cognition of pupils and their ability to think critically, independently.

...

In defending the Polish school, we took the level in consultation on the draft regulation on the liquidation of home works. In the analysis presented to the Ministry, we have shown that the form and scope of the amendments introduced in the paper violates the existing laws and constitutional provisions. In addition, the abolition of housework may consequence in an increase in differences in the learning outcomes achieved between students who have good grades and those who request additional motivation – for example in the form of homework – to repeat the material discussed in the lesson. The differences between public education and paid and more hours of private schooling will besides increase.

In the face of these extremist changes, it is suspected that the "weaning" of the programme base is intended to make area for activities of vulgar sex education. All the more so, due to the fact that Minister Nowacka herself announced that under the fresh “health-promoting education” programme, all Polish students will be given cognition “not only modern but besides free of prejudice and ideology”. What would that mean in practice?

The Ombudsman Bartłomiej Chmielowiec, who wrote to Minister Nowacka to “health education” became an chance to “move issues specified as sexuality, intellectual wellness prevention, respect for LGBT people and their sexuality”.

Why a fresh subject? It's simple. Only in this way can the government make vulgar sexual education compulsory. If you refuse to send a kid to a depraved workshop, parents will be facing penalties for... evasion of school duty.

In anticipation of the upcoming promotion of vulgar sexual education, we prepared a series of essays on sexual education, published weekly since December on the website of the Ordo Iuris Institute. They contain many shocking facts about the origin and assumptions of sexual education and examples of its implementation in Western European countries. The reading of these texts will surely open the eyes of many people who are unaware of what is today's permissive sexual education intensively promoted in the West.

...

Lawyers of Ordo Iuris are in constant readiness to intervene anywhere where sex activists will effort to enter schools against the will of their parents or where they will force teachers to give vulgar and ideological content to students. No household and no kid will stay without our support.

The defence of Polish education is crucial for saving the young generation of Poles from alienating from national culture and Christian heritage and sex demoralisation. I firmly believe that, with the aid of people like you, we are able to halt the ideological revolution at the Polish school.

In order to guarantee that Polish children proceed to learn in the Polish school about Polish heroes and masterpieces of national literature – together with educational organisations and experts in this field – we prepared an analysis of the changes proposed by ministerial experts to the programme basis.

In the document, we indicated that removing from the past lesson references to crucial figures and events for our nation is harmful. Contrary to the statements of the authors of the changes, this does not consequence in reducing content, but a change in the nature of past teaching. Currently, students learn the past of Poland through historical figures. This makes past a surviving and understandable object. If the proposed changes enter into force, the students may not hear about Zawisza the Black, Father Augustine Kordecki – defenders of the Jasna Góra monastery during the Swedish flood or mentioned in the national anthem, associate of the 17th century wars, hetman Stefan Czarniecki. The programme is intended to destruct topics related to the heroism of Poles during planet War II, e.g. the defence of Westerplatte, Wizna and Warsaw and the conflict of Bzura and close Kocek. From earlier periods of Polish history, even events specified as Grunwald triumph or Prussian tribute would be omitted from the programme basis.

In MEN's analysis, we prove that akin changes will negate the educational intent of past by bringing this object to dry factography. This will be contrary to the educational objectives expressed in the preamble of the Law of Education, which states that "education and education are intended to make in young people a sense of responsibility, love of Homeland and respect for Polish cultural heritage".

We emphasize the request to keep in the programming basis popularly liked and utilized during the celebrations of school patriotic songs, which constitute an highly valuable intergenerational link between Poles from different ages. We point out that contrary to the recommendations of the ministerial experts, the Polish national epic “Mr Tadeusz” should inactive be known to Polish seniors in its entirety, not only in fragments, as it has been the foundation of Polish identity for years. We indicate that young Poles should be able to learn about the works of St John Paul II and Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński at school, whose works are presently included in the list of supplementary readings.

The dramatic truncation of the program did not miss the mathematics, which is the queen of discipline or physics, which allows you to realize the world. Instead, Minister Nowacka wants to introduce a fresh subject in the form of "health education", in which an effort can be made to introduce vulgar sexual education into Polish schools and tame our children with LGBT propaganda. Unfortunately, while it is now essential to get the consent of their parents to pass on delicate psychosexual content to their children, participation in fresh subjects will be compulsory.

Our deficiency of a firm consequence to this threat may lead to a situation where Polish parents who refuse to send their children to specified activities will be persecuted and punished. In Germany, for years, a fine has been punishable for refusing to send a kid to sexual education classes and for refusing to pay her detention. In any cases, children are taken from home for this reason and parents lose their right to care for them.

The changes announced by Minister Nowacka in the programming basis of school subjects, aimed at transforming Polish identity into a pan-European identity, meet the changes proposed by the Eurocrats in the European treaties. It is part of the EU's education competence.

We are discussing this threat in our study "Why do we request sovereignty?", where we point out that your Europe supporters want this key area – education – to be transferred from the exclusive competence region of the EU associate States to the shared competence zone. In practice, this would mean giving the EU precedence in deciding what Polish children are to learn. As a result, whether we would learn about national culture and past in the education program would not depend on the elected Members and Ministers, but the unelected EU officials, who would not gotta number on our opinion.

This could lead to a situation in which, with a view to deepening the integration of Eurocrats, Poles should focus on teaching a common European history, covering subjects specified as "Europeans in times of national conflicts" or "the past of European integration", treating the stepmother or completely ignoring the past of their own people. Similarly, learning your own language, which would be cut off at the expense of the languages of the largest EU countries, could be treated.

Unification of education systems in EU countries will besides enable radicals to impose on Poles and another conservative peoples of our region the introduction of compulsory sexual education to schools – from the youngest classes.

Who is behind the permissive sexual education?

In order to make Poles aware of the dangers of permissive sexual education – defined by its supporters as comprehensive or comprehensive – we have developed a series of essays in which we analysed the assumptions of this model, its origin, the way of implementation, the methods of action of sexual educators and the possible consequences of its implementation for children and young people.

In an essay devoted to the genesis of modern sex education, we point to permissive precursors – i.e. allowing almost complete freedom of conduct and behaviour – a sex education model. 1 of them is the co-founder of the Marxist Frankfurt School Herbert Marcuse, who, in his book “Eros and Civilization”, claimed that “it is only the realization and extraction of the erotic nature of man... that will give humanity actual liberation.” Opponents of the sexual revolution were considered fascists. Another father of vulgar sex education was American entomologist Albert Kinsey, who claimed that man was a sexual being since birth, so even the smallest children have the right to enjoy their sexuality. Kinsey based his claims on the results of investigation on children (including infants!) while committing criminal sexual abuse.

German scientist and declared homosexual Helmut Kentler besides influenced the concepts of sex educators, who in his book Sexual Education mentioned, among another things, the masturbation of children from an early age, the mitigation of taboo incest between parents and children, and the introduction of sex toys in kindergartens and schools. Kentler claimed that "pederastic relations can very positively influence the improvement of the boy's personality". He put his theories into practice by organising the alleged Kentler experimentation lasting 3 decades, in which, with the support of German officials, children from children's homes were given custody to persons suspected or convicted of pedophile crimes. Years later, it turned out that the children active in the experimentation were abused and sexually abused by their guardians and Kentler himself.

In our publication, we point out that based on the theories of these authors, permissive sexual education does not recognise taboo themes or the lower, rigid boundary of sexual initiation. This goes hand in hand with the 2010 planet wellness Organisation's recommendations, which explicitly state that young children already aged 0-4 should be taught about masturbation. Attendance in specified activities gives young people the incorrect thought that alternatively of controlling their own urges, they should be subject to it.

What do sex educators want to teach our children?

In essays, we exposure false narratives of radicals who want to sexualise children, among another things, on the pretext of... anti-discrimination. We prove that the inherent component of gender-based sex education is tamed children with almost full freedom of sexual behavior. Seceducators reduce human sexuality to a sphere of pleasure. They ignore its procreative and even prison-forming function, spreading before young people a imagination of a planet in which the conception of a kid is simply a problem, an undesirable side effect of sexual intercourse, threatening comfortable lifestyles, self-fulfillment and the continued exercise of "sexual rights". In this perspective, killing an unborn kid is shown as a solution to the problem and an component of alleged reproductive and sexual rights.

We prove that vulgar sexual education conveys to children false claims of sex ideology, according to which the sex of man is not determined by biological facts, but a subjective feeling, which, as many examples show, after undergoing a surgical "sex correction", regretting its decision, may change. This education besides promotes a highly risky LGBT subculture lifestyle and homosexual practices. Contact with specified content has a negative effect on young people, which can origin feelings of confusion, confusion and doubts about their psychosexual identity.

In the series “What Will Sexual Educators Not Say?” we discuss examples of materials, games, games and textbooks that are utilized in sexual education classes. We describe, among another things, the German guidebook, which recommends that as part of the fun, small children decision on all fours like dogs and odor each other's body parts – in this intimate place. We call on the Austrian Ministry of Education, Art and Culture to present an instruction video for young people aged 12-18, in which sexual animations are presented. A teenager watching him will hear that “you have had sex on your own work since your 14th birthday. Since then, you've been considered sexually mature. Parents have nothing to do with it and you can sleep with whoever you want.” In the publication we besides pay attention to the content which children can find on the Polish Internet. We write, among another things, about the publication of the Ponton Group, on which websites we can find incentives to watch pornography or content published by the SEXEDPL Foundation, founded by model Anja Rubik, a gathering with which the current Minister of Education Barbara Nowacka has been bragging on social media not so long ago. Young people will read there, among another things, about how to prepare for anal sex, how to keep the hygiene of erotic gadgets, and how to decide on an earring in a clitoris, you can “provide additional stimuli not only during caress and intercourse, but besides during walking.”

We show the effects of vulgar sex education

In our cycle, we besides discuss the possible negative effects of sex sexualisation on children. We mention examples of Western countries, where more and more young people are taking risky sexual practices promoted by the LGBT lobby. We point out that between 2015 and 2020 in the UK, the percent of specified people rose from 3.3% to 8% in the 16-24 age group. In the US, between 2012 and 2017, the percent of adults declaring to be "LGBT" increased from 3.5% to 4.5%, with the increase occurring almost exclusively in the youngest group of people surveyed born between 1980 and 1999.

We besides pay attention to avalanches – ranging from respective 100 to even respective 1000 percent (US 175%, Canada 438%, Finland 543%, Netherlands 804%, United Kingdom 2 353%, Italy 7 100%, Australia 12 550%, Sweden 19 600%) – an increase in sexual identity disorders among youth in countries that introduced permissive sexual education. Unfortunately, a large proportion of these children do not receive professional intellectual assistance, but they are put into the hands of “specialists” who affirm their disorders. As a result, children receive other sex hormones and undergo irreversible, mutilating operations that aim to falsify their biological sex.

A complement to our series of essays is 10 interviews with experts in this delicate subject, which appeared on our YouTube profile.

If the changes to the programming basis announced by Donald Tusk's government enter into force, young Poles will not learn key information about our national culture and past in schools. Their cognition of mathematics, physics, natural sciences will besides be limited. As a result, they will be even easier subjected to manipulation and populist slogans of left-wing revolutionaries.

This place will include a permissive, vulgar sexual education, in which students will be introduced to LGBT lobby propaganda. As a result, the young generation will be corrupted, the consequences of which will be tragic. By not being able to let this, we are doing everything we can to halt this ideological revolution in the Polish education system. However, each of our actions requires certain measures.

That's why I ask for the support of the Institute for PLN 60, PLN 90, PLN 150 or any another amount, so lawyers Ordo Iuris will effectively defend Polish schools against depolonization, dechristianization, dehumanization, depravation and degradation.

With respect

Adw. Jerzy Kwasniewski - president of the Institute for Legal Culture Ordo Iuris

P.S. In a time of full degradation of the education and education strategy in Poland, we cannot limit ourselves to reactive activity. We besides request to come up with concrete educational alternatives. That is why we established the college of Collegium Intermarium, which is present an oasis of normality in the times of the mad, ideological revolution. At Collegium Intermarium we strive to return to the ideas of classical universities and classical, comprehensive education.

Currently, at Collegium Intermarium there are enrollments at the survey of Realistic Philosophy, which will let you to learn about the heritage of European classical philosophy. The cost of the course is PLN 1,600, but for the sympathizers of the Ordo Iuris Institute we have prepared an offer that will let you to subscribe to the course at a promotional price of PLN 890.