Konrad Baginski, naTemat.pl: Who won this match? Prime Minister Tusk or president Nawrocki? due to the fact that I don't think we should have any uncertainty that this was a fight, a test of strength, an intelligent duel.
Dr Mirosław Okkoś: If we start to consider this in the category of "who won", it is known that the President's supporters will say that he, those who support the Prime Minister, will state that the Prime Minister. But in the issue of imagery it seems that Donald Tusk amazed Charles Nawrocki with the focus of this and unequivocally.
It was apparent erstwhile the president couldn't stand it and interrupted him saying, "that's not why I invited you here." From his point of view, it was expected to be different. And I don't think your president's people have done their homework. I'm certain Donald Tusk, in the government, knew that what went to the media would stay in people's consciousness.
I had the impression that president Nawrocki had rehearsed his lines, but he forgot that the Prime Minister would answer him. That this isn't a speech, but there's gonna be an interaction.
Mr. Nawrocki's men prepared him to "bearably" say: deficit, investments and CPK. It worked in the campaign, but now? Nothing went on. And Prime Minister Tusk broke it.
He always works in respective directions. The first was numbers. expanding investments, highest economical growth, lowest unemployment, hard facts. Actually, he erased Mr. Nawrocki's narrative. And then these emotional things came along, due to the fact that it was besides a duel for spite.
Many people note that Prime Minister Tusk was even amazingly malicious. It wasn't like those heels stuck in the president anymore, it was powerful bullets.
And this is where you can see Donald Tusk is prepared. possibly I don't know, but possibly they expected Mr. Nawrocki to be better prepared. After all, from his camp were loud announcements that he would settle the government, manage.
That could mean his people are assuming that Donald Tusk is lying on the boards and not moving. And this is, as you can see, a diagnosis very powerfully premature.
I watched the president during the Prime Minister's message erstwhile he was under verbal fire. He'd reschedule the pages, correct the socks, rise his eyes to the sky, show a very wide smile. Was he anxious?
First of all, this behaviour can consequence in a deficiency of assurance or a deficiency of good feeling in the situation. He may have felt artificially in the situation he created. His full artillery preparation was beautiful good. "It'll be in the morning, I'll settle them, ask them about this and that."
And then it started going a small unexpected. I had the impression that he was starting to "dounce" a little. due to the fact that it was Andrzej Duda who had specified a thing: in the Sejm he made a beak, raised his eyes, it was specified an autocommentary.
Here it turned out that the process of the accelerated learning of public speeches by Karol Nawrocki ended with any success, due to the fact that from the first speech to the present it is simply a gap, but (as you can see) any things have not yet been adopted.
Body speech doesn't lie erstwhile someone's inexplicable, and Charles Nawrocki is not yet a dry, liar erstwhile it comes to the body. You can compose things, you can prepare issues, but in situations erstwhile something doesn't go the way the script was arranged, the body starts to tell the truth.
At Charles Nawrocki I saw discontent and uncertainty. He didn't know what else Tusk would say or what others would say or how people would choice up. Therefore, he played that he was loose. And if individual plays that he's loose, he's definitely not loose.
Notice the end of this conversation. The president started with advanced C, but in the end he said "it'll be later, we'll talk about it again, we'll discuss it." Did he realize that he was beaten up and wanted to finish the part available to the media as shortly as possible?
Yes, clearly. So far, Charles Nawrocki has walked for 3 weeks in specified a nymbie that he is simply a strong man who puts this Tusk and the government on him. I think it was him and his coworkers that put him to sleep. He promised to score, and it got out of hand. At 1 point on the Cabinet Council he said desperately that "we seem to deviate from the route, from the agenda."
In my opinion, the second thing is that the advisors have not prepared him. I think they're having any kind of scheming syndrome that they've already won the election and don't gotta prepare it. And he utilized slogans for which there was no content. No 1 said "hit it, hit it." We heard the generals. Charles Nawrocki didn't die terribly, but he surely didn't win the match.
And what did he show?
He showed, possibly for the first time in public situations already being president, that he had soft underbelly and that he inactive had a lot to learn. That, at any point, the certainty, the shoe, the arrogance, any show of force, is not enough.
It was not the crushing of the Tusk government that had to explain itself. Nope. Tusk never erstwhile explained himself.
Did anyone win or lose?
That's not how it works, that's not conclusive. I'm certain Donald Tusk did a show for his supporters and coalitions. He showed that he inactive had cojones and that it would not be as the president wanted. He stood up hard on a fewer things. If individual believed (because the Law and Justice thinks so), that after a year and a half the coalition is already lying on its shoulders and wants to surrender and that they have already won the election, he commits the sin of pride.
