Schreiber on Moskal's journey to Ibiza: "I wouldn't do that"

Zdjęcie: Schreiber o podróży Moskala na Ibizę: „Ja bym tak nie postąpił”

Łukasz Schreiber on 27 August, in the program “Tlit”, he estimated that Michael Moskal had made a mistake flying to Ibiza for a gathering with the head of Zondacrypto Przemysław Kralem. The Plus improvement MP stressed that he would not have done so on his own, but rejected the work of the full environment. The transparency of political contacts with business is at stake.

Schreiber: stakeholders should supply explanations

Łukasz Schreiber was asked in the Virtual Poland 'Tlit' program about the journey of Michał Moskal MP to Ibiza and his gathering with Przemysław Kralem, head of Zondacrypto. He replied that those straight connected with the case should supply explanations. At the same time, he warned that work must not be transferred to the full political environment. It's the right line. circumstantial decisions by circumstantial people are settled, not collectively by a organization or its constituents.

Schreiber said he was amazed at the decision to leave. He besides recalled Moskal's position, according to which the MP was not given money and the journey was not sponsored. The interviewer pointed out that the cost of leaving was to be borne by another person. These discrepancies require a simple, documented explanation: who paid, for what intent the gathering was and what its relation with the later public activity of the MP was.

Business contacts require clear rules

The parliamentary contact with an entrepreneur alone is not a reproach. Politicians should know the problems of companies operating in Poland, especially erstwhile the law concerns a fresh and rapidly developing industry. The problem begins erstwhile the form of the gathering blurs the boundary between public work and private departure. Ibiza, a vague way of covering costs and deficiency of cognition of the organization authorities form questions that are not adequate to answer with a general assurance.

In the programme, the guide pointed to a convergence between Moscow's later opinions in the Sejm and Kral's postulates. That's a journalist's statement, not evidence of illegal activity. Michael Moskal denied taking money and until specified time as the conclusive facts are presented, there is no reason to attribute a crime to him. On the another hand, there is simply a full basis to require a associate to be more transparent than a private person. The mandate is simply a commitment to citizens.

The opposition must not lower its own standards

Schreiber said he wouldn't go to Ibiza alone to talk to him. erstwhile asked if Moskal had made a mistake, he answered yes and added that he was most likely aware of it. This evaluation is more crucial than organization defense. The right, which criticises the opaque ties of power to the large business, must apply the same requirements to its own representatives.

The issue besides has a broader political context. Civil Coalition submitted a announcement concerning Michał Moskalwhich does not prejudge guilt and replace evidence-based proceedings. Political warfare must neither convict a man before judgement nor service as a veil against honest questions.

Public trust is at stake

Citizens have the right to know who finances Members' travel, who parliamentarians consult legal solutions and whether specified contacts are revealed. It's not about not talking to entrepreneurs. It is about clear rules that defend the independency of the mandate and the interest of the State.

Moskal's best consequence will not be an outrage on the media or organization message, but a full chronology of events and papers explaining travel costs. If there is no breach of law or financial dependence, transparency is besides in his interest. Polish policy will regain its weight only erstwhile the standard of transparency applies to everyone, regardless of organization colours.

Source: WP News

Source: WP News