14 May – the first in Polish past transcript of the act of "marriage" of 2 men was made. LGBT promoters have already raised the request to let them to adopt on a par with real marriages. The civilian State authoritative was in quite a few problem how to enter this couple pretending to be married? At the end of the second ‘wife’ he entered in the box ‘woman’. Trzaskowski, a glories communicative that yet managed to flancate this weed in Poland, assured that the next ones would be done even faster.
Is there anything to be happy about? Really, yeah. Namely, due to the fact that the Warsaw man elected by the "culturerägers" like him – someway I do not find a Polish word here – did not become president of Poland. Our country has suffered adequate from various external and interior enemies. It is not excluded that in the case of longer regulation of the current strategy the intellectual position of the sick will be equal to the remainder of Poles. After all, it is about human rights. The fact that they are denied to a man who is completely complete in the womb, and waiting only for the inclusion in the circulation of life, has no meaning in the sense of the law in force in Poland Tusk. On the contrary. I'll usage a female named Veronica. While pregnant, she asked the gynecologist Peter A. to examine the ultrasound and consult. He diagnosed – as it turned out later – Down syndrome in a kid and suggested an abortion. The female categorically refused and changed doctors. Until childbirth, she lived under stress due to fear for her son, but who came into the planet healthy (although prematurely). After a while, Mrs. Weronika noticed on social media a question about Peter A's opinion as a pregnant doctor. A female warned a young parent of abortion. Shortly thereafter, she received a call to the police; proceedings and trial began. She was sentenced to social work and to apologize to the doctor, as well as to pay him back the costs of the trial (1,812 PLN). It's specified a common raven from our courtrooms, where logic and objectivity, especially justice, are in vain to seek. The informing was not only on the spot, but it was necessary, as it was essential to aid a individual at risk. Failure to complete this involves criminal liability. It all worked here. just the opposite.
Meanwhile, Fr Owl will surely be covered by Neumann's doctrine and nothing will happen to him due to slandering his wife and mother's good name. David Wildstein is outraged at this: “Behold, Kazimierz Owa..., turns the spin towards a private woman, lying I manipulating, a female who has a husband and household that has been decently pulled out of Sakiewicz’s bed.” This not only hits the priest's morale, but Fr. Owl is supposedly a journalist. The city denounces the bandit assault on the journalist, attempts to flatter the regime, who can defend himself against the fact with only a police (or possibly militia) baton. By the way, it's good for Fr. Sowie due to the fact that he's a journalist.
So in Poland we have moral order, from which the Decalogue has been removed and the principles on which the Western planet builds lawlessness, the civilization of death, the wobbly foundations of humanity and the colossal pyramid of lies are entered. Resisting this results in a conviction that fell on Mrs. Veronica. This fresh planet that sinks into the swamp besides has in our version in the individual of Fr. Everything should open the eyes of people who are not completely blind. The question is, erstwhile do they see it?
The “minister” of Kierwiński works completely without a head, otherwise in accord with the chief's personality, but police officers refusing to identify themselves, snooping around the residence of journalists of the Republic, allegedly called for due to the fact that individual reported a desire to commit suicide by a juvenile or to give akin nonsense as a reason for the arrival, that is 1 step besides far away. The good name of the police in Tusk's time was badly hurt, and with the enthusiastic greeting of multi-kulti, the police may be useful. What, though, erstwhile he comes in useful with Tusk in specified a dirty substance as the bluntness of free speech? An old proverb says the devil eats flies from hunger. Well, possibly not just flies!
