The author of the following text is Rostislav Iszczenko, a political scientist from Ukraine. Until late he was president of an institution called the Ukrainian strategy Analysis and Forecasting Centre, now he is directing what is called the strategy Analysis Centre and the Noworosion Forecasting Centre, with a change of name being considered not accidental. The text I learned from the fact that it was advertised by Alexander Dugin, a individual who does not request to be presented. Both names show that the thesis of Iszczenko's text is valid for certain circles in Russia. possibly even for her management. It is besides a model example of Russian propaganda, whose character the Polish public does not know. I'm sorry for the awkward, fast translation. I left out any insignificant digressions, but I give you a link to the full text. "Putin's strategical plan Out of the analysis of Crimean accidents, it can be assumed that Moscow needs all Ukraine. Noworosja, in the logic of implementing this script – is only a temporary task designed to safe a war victory, so as not to affect Russia. And carry out the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state in accordance with global law standards. The process of creating a regular army of Novorostia and eliminating the Ataman region, and gradually creating the region's administrative structure as well as its efficient, is updating the issue of the further destiny of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republic. Especially during this time, the people of the planet revived. We must hatred Putin with all the fibers of the soul, so that the process of transforming a common decision into an army – which even panicners admit – is to be regarded as leaving fresh Russia. Nothing, apart from hating the Russian president, can be logically explained by the positions of Russian alarmist patriots, claiming behind Ukrainian Nazis that Putin is guilty of everything. due to the fact that he's always guilty. If he wanted to abandon fresh Russia, she'd be long gone. In April or May 2014, as well as in August, it could be said, “Yes, we saved Crimea, and we deficiency the strength for the rest.” And on a wave of patriotic upheaval after regaining Crimea, society would peacefully swallow a refusal to support fresh Russia. And no retired FSB colonel, even if he were Eugenius Sabaud, Duke of Marlborough, Bonaparte, number of Suvorov in 1 person, with 20 of his colleagues, would be able to establish an army (even as Ukrainian as) without direct Russian assistance. It is not possible for 1 state institution to keep a "fair conflict between fresh Russia" and the another to "reveal" it, with the President's full passiveness in opposing evil. Legends of eternally damaging Cremolovian “basht” are good for fans of conspiracy theories. Otherwise Russia would not be able to defy the power of the American, yet late clearly beyond Moscow's capacity. Those who are to be ‘olani’ are incapable to make an army. This does not mean, of course, that in the fresh Russian problem there are no hidden intentions, that the destiny of this political being is not threatened by anything. Firstly, the management of each country (except Ukraine) acts in relation to a circumstantial strategical objective. All the more reason for this with respect to the Russian leadership. Only an unconscious man can honestly believe that as long as the Americans, without saving their energy, worked to completely destruct Russia as a geopolitical power, Moscow only occasionally and severely reacted to their violent swindles. And as a result, the US, together with the EU and NATO, officially announcing their aim to break up Russia and deprive Putin of power, could not deal with Russia all year long. Secondly, recalling the actions of the Russian authorities in the Ukrainian direction (including those before the rebellion), we can find the place of Ukraine in the strategical plan and, as a result, forecast the destiny of fresh Russia. Russia needs the full Ukraine Even in 2004, it was clear that Moscow was fighting for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, fresh Russia could appear during the first (yeshchenkovian) coup. In 2004, alternatively of thechark mess created by Dobkin in 2014, the Northdonietsky convention of deputies of all levels worked successfully. uncovering a leader and getting him started with Russian service specialists wasn't a problem. Especially since there were no armed neo-Nazi gangs around the country, and the power in Kiev could not be legitimized without the "third round" of the election, then the capital and western Ukraine had no strong arguments against the opposition of the South West. (...) The situation of 2004 was fundamentally different from the situation of 2014 only 1 thing: the political conflict was not over, and it was possible to wipe out Yushchenko by peaceful means through elections. And then it happened. It was so not essential to make a war base against Kiev in the east. The efforts of Yanukovich and his crew for a political rematch and their forced orientation towards the pro-Russian electorate – the only 1 who could reconstruct him to power – proved to be sufficient. By opposing the EU on the position agreement, Moscow fought for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, it would not be wise to exert a sharp economical force on Yanukovich as early as August 2013 to show him what would happen after the signing of the association agreement with the EU. After all, the ruin of Ukraine and the inevitable terrible economical consequences (Janukovich is not Jaceniuk, his West would not even give what gives Jaceniuk) were guaranteed. All the more so, the cities of the South East, powerfully connected with the local industry, the first to experience the sad consequences and so on the hated association agreement. Moscow fought and fought for the full Ukraine. The Crimea had to occupy not due to the fact that the local Russians were more Russian than those from Donetsk or Kharkiv. And not due to the fact that Crimea has risen. Kharkiv was formed, and Crimean authorities, characterized by servilism towards the authoritative Kiev (if not counting Mieszkov's ambiguous presidency), were ready to give the peninsula to the junta without any conditions. But there was a Russian fleet in Crimea, and the bannermen went there not to run Russian activists, but to provoke the fleet to shoot. At the time, the main issue was to bring Russia into an armed conflict in Ukraine. Therefore, it was essential to give Crimea the position of Russian territory hastily, due to the fact that then the Kiev junta, attempting to cross Perekop, would have become an aggressor who swung on Russian soil. The US and the EU may not recognise the de jure of joining Crimea in Russia, but, in fact, it is Russian land and everyone has to face it. In general, all of Russia's activities during the fresh decade of Ukrainian crisis attest to Moscow's intention to integrate all of Ukraine into the Russian Eurasian task alternatively than part. The thing about the 2014 coup was that Ukraine would become 1 of the most crucial parts of the Customs Union and then the Eurasian economical Union. Russia hoped to establish a friendly political agreement in Kiev, which would start implementing an equal economical cooperation policy. It did not foresee direct political submission to Kiev, as it does not foresee the subordination of Moscow to Minsk or Astana. Of course, economical and military potential, besides the geographical location of Russia (its territory is the link binding the full Eurasia) makes it unambiguously a locomotive of post-Soviet integration. Russia besides provides cultural unity. Kazakhs and Armenians do not talk Ukrainian, but Russian. Reruption of the Russian planet Talk about the establishment of any Ukrainian state would be besides optimistic. Firstly, it will be essential to establish an external body for denazification. Secondly, an global military and police control will be required to disarm Nazi militants and bandits. Thirdly, it will take besides long to rebuild the economy and it will require immense investments. To put any unrealisticly large money in another's economy, without any guarantees that in a fewer years' time again in Kiev it would be inexcusable naivety. So Ukraine is needed all of Russia. Otherwise, the anticipation of complete purification of fresh York from the flags, even within 8 circuits, would already be fulfilled. Ukraine cannot be part of the integration of the Eurasian projects as an independent state, due to the fact that there is no state, and we would lose besides much time, energy and resources to rebuild it. This means that only 1 option remains – integration into the Euro-Asian space as part of Russia. Of course, Russia has developed rusophobia today, 40-50 percent of the population sees Russia as an enemy. But don't forget that most of them are Russian people, surrounded by hostile propaganda. Ukrainian – a word of territorial significance. From this point of view, Riazianic – not Russian either. He speaks Rianan, wears Rianan clothes. It has its ryan history, and in this story, Riazań has more than erstwhile bewildered the Grand Duchy of Vladimir and Moscow. Generally, Russian people, even partially derupt, must be reruptised. There's no another way. An empire rejecting territories, inhabited by indigenous imperial state-generated ethnos, just due to the fact that part of this ethnos fell into slavery to Nazi propaganda, undercut its own base. But if Belarus, with all its ruscour and economical dependence on Russia, is inactive able to be as a stand-alone state, and so the process of its reintegration into the Russian planet will be severely extended over time (inclusive mechanisms foretell the maximum possible degree of autonomy), then Ukraine has exhausted its capacity for independent state development. With her own strength, she will not appear from the chaos that her leaders brought her into. Moreover, all remaining part of independent Ukraine will be hostile to the Russian planet and will pose problems for Russia, the EU and Russian-European cooperation. You can't let the enemy stay on the threshold. In fact, Russia has no alternate to including the Ukrainian territory and the remaining population in the competent Russian state. At the same time, it is possible that any peripheral western areas may fall off and be attached to the territories of European neighbours (so as not to be besides outraged), but alternatively at this phase the Russian leadership finds the division of Ukraine undesirable. Declarations by the Kremlin and the Ministry of abroad Affairs of the FR on attachment to the thought of neutral national Ukraine (within the old borders, but without Crimea) are a tribute to the diplomatic convention, not a real plan. Who will force the people of Donbas and the Halicans to live in 1 country, who started a civilian war against Donbas. You gotta keep an expeditionary corps there that separates 2 hostile sides so that the country is not drawn into a bloody home conflict again. Indeed, in order to save Ukraine, it must be occupied. I am not convinced that there has already been an exact decision in the Kremlin where the western border of Russia should go after the Ukrainian crisis. With or without Galicia, but there won't be any peculiar problems. First, the hazing is easy and positively subject to force, so that they themselves will become the most active denasifiers (they like to conduct mirrors of all kinds). Secondly, present Ukraine is ruled by the most nationalist of possible authorities. They may be even more nationalistic, but then it will no longer be the central power, but the machnowskie "republik". Consequently, at this point, the Halitian nationalism falls into a logical contradiction – the "patriots" in power prove inferior to the "criminal regime". erstwhile the “patriots” are overthrown, the mid-statistical Halician will accept that Ukrainians cannot regulation themselves, so let anyone from outside rule. And since the West turned out to be incapable of taking work for Ukraine, only Russia remains. Thirdly, the halibuts will be pleased that it will be much easier to go to Tiumenia (for gas tankers) and Podmoskowia (for the remaining mass). In general, the biggest problem may be the besides massive entry of Halicans in the ranks of “Only Russia”. Time project? But for integration with Russia all over Ukraine, any fresh Russia needs no more than to make 1 Federation neutral Ukraine, meaning that it is not essential at all. Why make a fresh Russia if Kharkiv and Donetsk, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk peacefully integrate the circuit behind the circuit? Apart from that, if there is simply a fresh Russian state, it will shortly have its own political elite, who will want to take more from Russia than to give it. And then the thought of the fresh Russian people will be born – due to the fact that someway it is essential to justify the existence of the fresh Russian state. In the end, Russia will receive a fresh Ukraine at its borders for its own money, only under the name of fresh Russia. And it all starts over... I think it can be explained on a temporary basis, even at the moment, that, with the exception of the structures essential to carry out effective warfare, no another state institutions are created. Everything remains within the DRL/LRL, i.e. in fact at the regional level. And the erstwhile widely advertised parliament of Novorosia under the leadership of Oleg Cariewa is inactive a decorative body, in practice without influence on anything and nothing significant. For this reason, they are criticized by many appointments for executive positions in both republics for people with no authority but easy to control. Why make state structures erstwhile they're coming down soon? Why complete the leadership of Novorostia with competent, ambitious specialists erstwhile no 1 predicts the longer functioning of Novorostia? We request people who will leave without murmuring at a time and will not fight to preserve fresh Russian quasi statehood by pushing old colleagues sticks into spokes. What's the function of fresh York today? Firstly, as has already been said, it organises a opposition campfire against the junta in Ukrainian territory. Secondly, it forms a liberating army, capable of carrying out an offensive to Kiev and beyond - as shortly as the junta begins to fall apart and this begins. Thirdly, individual should declare their accession to Russia on behalf of all Ukraine. Why? Take her on another circuit? So the liberation of Ukraine from Nazism will be carried out formally by Ukrainian troops. The Army of Noworosia – is the same side of civilian war as the Kiev Army. Consequently, we are faced not with external aggression, but with interior combat. The winner in the civilian war is legitimized by the fact of winning, he does not request an additional card. The fresh Ukrainian government will have the right to any external political steps. At the same time, the decision to establish state unity between Ukraine and Russia will be justified by the fact that this is simply a forced consequence of a humanitarian disaster to which the Nazi government will be responsible, and the consequences of which cannot be corrected alone. In fact, the entry of Ukraine into Russia will besides correspond to the Nazis themselves and their supporters (those who will not be able to hide behind Ukraine's borders). The thing is, there was a regular judiciary in Russia, and the law protects everyone, regardless of ideological preferences. Therefore, Nazi supporters, if they did not shed blood, but only “warred” on social networks, can feel safe. And the establishment of power of the winners of the civilian war, who will compose their own rights, and so far will be guided by the "Revolutionary Motivation", full understood by the Barbarian shelling of Donetsk and Lugansk, after the Odski Chatyn and Melitopolski shooting, after hundreds of tortured antifascists, may not like many. So there are grounds to believe that Novorosja is simply a temporary project, planned for the time of civilian war and called for securing the war triumph and global justification for the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state, without formally involving Russia in this process. I am convinced that after the triumph of the army of Novorosia, the evidence of the savagery of the Kiev government will be more than adequate to make the planet community, including the number and supporters of the Kiev Nazis from the US and the EU, consider the fresh power legal. And erstwhile the legitimate and legal authority decides that the Russians of fresh Russia must necessarily return home – to historical Russia, then it will be besides late for outrage.".
Russia wants all Ukraine
Zdjęcie: Wildstein: Putin Wygrał
If individual thinks that Russian actions in Ukraine are not a threat to Poland, they should read the following text. It's uncommon to meet specified a cynically sincere political lecture. The name “Poland” does not fall there, but the presented method can be applied by Russia to each country. To us, too.
The author of the following text is Rostislav Iszczenko, a political scientist from Ukraine. Until late he was president of an institution called the Ukrainian strategy Analysis and Forecasting Centre, now he is directing what is called the strategy Analysis Centre and the Noworosion Forecasting Centre, with a change of name being considered not accidental. The text I learned from the fact that it was advertised by Alexander Dugin, a individual who does not request to be presented. Both names show that the thesis of Iszczenko's text is valid for certain circles in Russia. possibly even for her management. It is besides a model example of Russian propaganda, whose character the Polish public does not know. I'm sorry for the awkward, fast translation. I left out any insignificant digressions, but I give you a link to the full text. "Putin's strategical plan Out of the analysis of Crimean accidents, it can be assumed that Moscow needs all Ukraine. Noworosja, in the logic of implementing this script – is only a temporary task designed to safe a war victory, so as not to affect Russia. And carry out the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state in accordance with global law standards. The process of creating a regular army of Novorostia and eliminating the Ataman region, and gradually creating the region's administrative structure as well as its efficient, is updating the issue of the further destiny of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republic. Especially during this time, the people of the planet revived. We must hatred Putin with all the fibers of the soul, so that the process of transforming a common decision into an army – which even panicners admit – is to be regarded as leaving fresh Russia. Nothing, apart from hating the Russian president, can be logically explained by the positions of Russian alarmist patriots, claiming behind Ukrainian Nazis that Putin is guilty of everything. due to the fact that he's always guilty. If he wanted to abandon fresh Russia, she'd be long gone. In April or May 2014, as well as in August, it could be said, “Yes, we saved Crimea, and we deficiency the strength for the rest.” And on a wave of patriotic upheaval after regaining Crimea, society would peacefully swallow a refusal to support fresh Russia. And no retired FSB colonel, even if he were Eugenius Sabaud, Duke of Marlborough, Bonaparte, number of Suvorov in 1 person, with 20 of his colleagues, would be able to establish an army (even as Ukrainian as) without direct Russian assistance. It is not possible for 1 state institution to keep a "fair conflict between fresh Russia" and the another to "reveal" it, with the President's full passiveness in opposing evil. Legends of eternally damaging Cremolovian “basht” are good for fans of conspiracy theories. Otherwise Russia would not be able to defy the power of the American, yet late clearly beyond Moscow's capacity. Those who are to be ‘olani’ are incapable to make an army. This does not mean, of course, that in the fresh Russian problem there are no hidden intentions, that the destiny of this political being is not threatened by anything. Firstly, the management of each country (except Ukraine) acts in relation to a circumstantial strategical objective. All the more reason for this with respect to the Russian leadership. Only an unconscious man can honestly believe that as long as the Americans, without saving their energy, worked to completely destruct Russia as a geopolitical power, Moscow only occasionally and severely reacted to their violent swindles. And as a result, the US, together with the EU and NATO, officially announcing their aim to break up Russia and deprive Putin of power, could not deal with Russia all year long. Secondly, recalling the actions of the Russian authorities in the Ukrainian direction (including those before the rebellion), we can find the place of Ukraine in the strategical plan and, as a result, forecast the destiny of fresh Russia. Russia needs the full Ukraine Even in 2004, it was clear that Moscow was fighting for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, fresh Russia could appear during the first (yeshchenkovian) coup. In 2004, alternatively of thechark mess created by Dobkin in 2014, the Northdonietsky convention of deputies of all levels worked successfully. uncovering a leader and getting him started with Russian service specialists wasn't a problem. Especially since there were no armed neo-Nazi gangs around the country, and the power in Kiev could not be legitimized without the "third round" of the election, then the capital and western Ukraine had no strong arguments against the opposition of the South West. (...) The situation of 2004 was fundamentally different from the situation of 2014 only 1 thing: the political conflict was not over, and it was possible to wipe out Yushchenko by peaceful means through elections. And then it happened. It was so not essential to make a war base against Kiev in the east. The efforts of Yanukovich and his crew for a political rematch and their forced orientation towards the pro-Russian electorate – the only 1 who could reconstruct him to power – proved to be sufficient. By opposing the EU on the position agreement, Moscow fought for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, it would not be wise to exert a sharp economical force on Yanukovich as early as August 2013 to show him what would happen after the signing of the association agreement with the EU. After all, the ruin of Ukraine and the inevitable terrible economical consequences (Janukovich is not Jaceniuk, his West would not even give what gives Jaceniuk) were guaranteed. All the more so, the cities of the South East, powerfully connected with the local industry, the first to experience the sad consequences and so on the hated association agreement. Moscow fought and fought for the full Ukraine. The Crimea had to occupy not due to the fact that the local Russians were more Russian than those from Donetsk or Kharkiv. And not due to the fact that Crimea has risen. Kharkiv was formed, and Crimean authorities, characterized by servilism towards the authoritative Kiev (if not counting Mieszkov's ambiguous presidency), were ready to give the peninsula to the junta without any conditions. But there was a Russian fleet in Crimea, and the bannermen went there not to run Russian activists, but to provoke the fleet to shoot. At the time, the main issue was to bring Russia into an armed conflict in Ukraine. Therefore, it was essential to give Crimea the position of Russian territory hastily, due to the fact that then the Kiev junta, attempting to cross Perekop, would have become an aggressor who swung on Russian soil. The US and the EU may not recognise the de jure of joining Crimea in Russia, but, in fact, it is Russian land and everyone has to face it. In general, all of Russia's activities during the fresh decade of Ukrainian crisis attest to Moscow's intention to integrate all of Ukraine into the Russian Eurasian task alternatively than part. The thing about the 2014 coup was that Ukraine would become 1 of the most crucial parts of the Customs Union and then the Eurasian economical Union. Russia hoped to establish a friendly political agreement in Kiev, which would start implementing an equal economical cooperation policy. It did not foresee direct political submission to Kiev, as it does not foresee the subordination of Moscow to Minsk or Astana. Of course, economical and military potential, besides the geographical location of Russia (its territory is the link binding the full Eurasia) makes it unambiguously a locomotive of post-Soviet integration. Russia besides provides cultural unity. Kazakhs and Armenians do not talk Ukrainian, but Russian. Reruption of the Russian planet Talk about the establishment of any Ukrainian state would be besides optimistic. Firstly, it will be essential to establish an external body for denazification. Secondly, an global military and police control will be required to disarm Nazi militants and bandits. Thirdly, it will take besides long to rebuild the economy and it will require immense investments. To put any unrealisticly large money in another's economy, without any guarantees that in a fewer years' time again in Kiev it would be inexcusable naivety. So Ukraine is needed all of Russia. Otherwise, the anticipation of complete purification of fresh York from the flags, even within 8 circuits, would already be fulfilled. Ukraine cannot be part of the integration of the Eurasian projects as an independent state, due to the fact that there is no state, and we would lose besides much time, energy and resources to rebuild it. This means that only 1 option remains – integration into the Euro-Asian space as part of Russia. Of course, Russia has developed rusophobia today, 40-50 percent of the population sees Russia as an enemy. But don't forget that most of them are Russian people, surrounded by hostile propaganda. Ukrainian – a word of territorial significance. From this point of view, Riazianic – not Russian either. He speaks Rianan, wears Rianan clothes. It has its ryan history, and in this story, Riazań has more than erstwhile bewildered the Grand Duchy of Vladimir and Moscow. Generally, Russian people, even partially derupt, must be reruptised. There's no another way. An empire rejecting territories, inhabited by indigenous imperial state-generated ethnos, just due to the fact that part of this ethnos fell into slavery to Nazi propaganda, undercut its own base. But if Belarus, with all its ruscour and economical dependence on Russia, is inactive able to be as a stand-alone state, and so the process of its reintegration into the Russian planet will be severely extended over time (inclusive mechanisms foretell the maximum possible degree of autonomy), then Ukraine has exhausted its capacity for independent state development. With her own strength, she will not appear from the chaos that her leaders brought her into. Moreover, all remaining part of independent Ukraine will be hostile to the Russian planet and will pose problems for Russia, the EU and Russian-European cooperation. You can't let the enemy stay on the threshold. In fact, Russia has no alternate to including the Ukrainian territory and the remaining population in the competent Russian state. At the same time, it is possible that any peripheral western areas may fall off and be attached to the territories of European neighbours (so as not to be besides outraged), but alternatively at this phase the Russian leadership finds the division of Ukraine undesirable. Declarations by the Kremlin and the Ministry of abroad Affairs of the FR on attachment to the thought of neutral national Ukraine (within the old borders, but without Crimea) are a tribute to the diplomatic convention, not a real plan. Who will force the people of Donbas and the Halicans to live in 1 country, who started a civilian war against Donbas. You gotta keep an expeditionary corps there that separates 2 hostile sides so that the country is not drawn into a bloody home conflict again. Indeed, in order to save Ukraine, it must be occupied. I am not convinced that there has already been an exact decision in the Kremlin where the western border of Russia should go after the Ukrainian crisis. With or without Galicia, but there won't be any peculiar problems. First, the hazing is easy and positively subject to force, so that they themselves will become the most active denasifiers (they like to conduct mirrors of all kinds). Secondly, present Ukraine is ruled by the most nationalist of possible authorities. They may be even more nationalistic, but then it will no longer be the central power, but the machnowskie "republik". Consequently, at this point, the Halitian nationalism falls into a logical contradiction – the "patriots" in power prove inferior to the "criminal regime". erstwhile the “patriots” are overthrown, the mid-statistical Halician will accept that Ukrainians cannot regulation themselves, so let anyone from outside rule. And since the West turned out to be incapable of taking work for Ukraine, only Russia remains. Thirdly, the halibuts will be pleased that it will be much easier to go to Tiumenia (for gas tankers) and Podmoskowia (for the remaining mass). In general, the biggest problem may be the besides massive entry of Halicans in the ranks of “Only Russia”. Time project? But for integration with Russia all over Ukraine, any fresh Russia needs no more than to make 1 Federation neutral Ukraine, meaning that it is not essential at all. Why make a fresh Russia if Kharkiv and Donetsk, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk peacefully integrate the circuit behind the circuit? Apart from that, if there is simply a fresh Russian state, it will shortly have its own political elite, who will want to take more from Russia than to give it. And then the thought of the fresh Russian people will be born – due to the fact that someway it is essential to justify the existence of the fresh Russian state. In the end, Russia will receive a fresh Ukraine at its borders for its own money, only under the name of fresh Russia. And it all starts over... I think it can be explained on a temporary basis, even at the moment, that, with the exception of the structures essential to carry out effective warfare, no another state institutions are created. Everything remains within the DRL/LRL, i.e. in fact at the regional level. And the erstwhile widely advertised parliament of Novorosia under the leadership of Oleg Cariewa is inactive a decorative body, in practice without influence on anything and nothing significant. For this reason, they are criticized by many appointments for executive positions in both republics for people with no authority but easy to control. Why make state structures erstwhile they're coming down soon? Why complete the leadership of Novorostia with competent, ambitious specialists erstwhile no 1 predicts the longer functioning of Novorostia? We request people who will leave without murmuring at a time and will not fight to preserve fresh Russian quasi statehood by pushing old colleagues sticks into spokes. What's the function of fresh York today? Firstly, as has already been said, it organises a opposition campfire against the junta in Ukrainian territory. Secondly, it forms a liberating army, capable of carrying out an offensive to Kiev and beyond - as shortly as the junta begins to fall apart and this begins. Thirdly, individual should declare their accession to Russia on behalf of all Ukraine. Why? Take her on another circuit? So the liberation of Ukraine from Nazism will be carried out formally by Ukrainian troops. The Army of Noworosia – is the same side of civilian war as the Kiev Army. Consequently, we are faced not with external aggression, but with interior combat. The winner in the civilian war is legitimized by the fact of winning, he does not request an additional card. The fresh Ukrainian government will have the right to any external political steps. At the same time, the decision to establish state unity between Ukraine and Russia will be justified by the fact that this is simply a forced consequence of a humanitarian disaster to which the Nazi government will be responsible, and the consequences of which cannot be corrected alone. In fact, the entry of Ukraine into Russia will besides correspond to the Nazis themselves and their supporters (those who will not be able to hide behind Ukraine's borders). The thing is, there was a regular judiciary in Russia, and the law protects everyone, regardless of ideological preferences. Therefore, Nazi supporters, if they did not shed blood, but only “warred” on social networks, can feel safe. And the establishment of power of the winners of the civilian war, who will compose their own rights, and so far will be guided by the "Revolutionary Motivation", full understood by the Barbarian shelling of Donetsk and Lugansk, after the Odski Chatyn and Melitopolski shooting, after hundreds of tortured antifascists, may not like many. So there are grounds to believe that Novorosja is simply a temporary project, planned for the time of civilian war and called for securing the war triumph and global justification for the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state, without formally involving Russia in this process. I am convinced that after the triumph of the army of Novorosia, the evidence of the savagery of the Kiev government will be more than adequate to make the planet community, including the number and supporters of the Kiev Nazis from the US and the EU, consider the fresh power legal. And erstwhile the legitimate and legal authority decides that the Russians of fresh Russia must necessarily return home – to historical Russia, then it will be besides late for outrage.".
The author of the following text is Rostislav Iszczenko, a political scientist from Ukraine. Until late he was president of an institution called the Ukrainian strategy Analysis and Forecasting Centre, now he is directing what is called the strategy Analysis Centre and the Noworosion Forecasting Centre, with a change of name being considered not accidental. The text I learned from the fact that it was advertised by Alexander Dugin, a individual who does not request to be presented. Both names show that the thesis of Iszczenko's text is valid for certain circles in Russia. possibly even for her management. It is besides a model example of Russian propaganda, whose character the Polish public does not know. I'm sorry for the awkward, fast translation. I left out any insignificant digressions, but I give you a link to the full text. "Putin's strategical plan Out of the analysis of Crimean accidents, it can be assumed that Moscow needs all Ukraine. Noworosja, in the logic of implementing this script – is only a temporary task designed to safe a war victory, so as not to affect Russia. And carry out the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state in accordance with global law standards. The process of creating a regular army of Novorostia and eliminating the Ataman region, and gradually creating the region's administrative structure as well as its efficient, is updating the issue of the further destiny of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republic. Especially during this time, the people of the planet revived. We must hatred Putin with all the fibers of the soul, so that the process of transforming a common decision into an army – which even panicners admit – is to be regarded as leaving fresh Russia. Nothing, apart from hating the Russian president, can be logically explained by the positions of Russian alarmist patriots, claiming behind Ukrainian Nazis that Putin is guilty of everything. due to the fact that he's always guilty. If he wanted to abandon fresh Russia, she'd be long gone. In April or May 2014, as well as in August, it could be said, “Yes, we saved Crimea, and we deficiency the strength for the rest.” And on a wave of patriotic upheaval after regaining Crimea, society would peacefully swallow a refusal to support fresh Russia. And no retired FSB colonel, even if he were Eugenius Sabaud, Duke of Marlborough, Bonaparte, number of Suvorov in 1 person, with 20 of his colleagues, would be able to establish an army (even as Ukrainian as) without direct Russian assistance. It is not possible for 1 state institution to keep a "fair conflict between fresh Russia" and the another to "reveal" it, with the President's full passiveness in opposing evil. Legends of eternally damaging Cremolovian “basht” are good for fans of conspiracy theories. Otherwise Russia would not be able to defy the power of the American, yet late clearly beyond Moscow's capacity. Those who are to be ‘olani’ are incapable to make an army. This does not mean, of course, that in the fresh Russian problem there are no hidden intentions, that the destiny of this political being is not threatened by anything. Firstly, the management of each country (except Ukraine) acts in relation to a circumstantial strategical objective. All the more reason for this with respect to the Russian leadership. Only an unconscious man can honestly believe that as long as the Americans, without saving their energy, worked to completely destruct Russia as a geopolitical power, Moscow only occasionally and severely reacted to their violent swindles. And as a result, the US, together with the EU and NATO, officially announcing their aim to break up Russia and deprive Putin of power, could not deal with Russia all year long. Secondly, recalling the actions of the Russian authorities in the Ukrainian direction (including those before the rebellion), we can find the place of Ukraine in the strategical plan and, as a result, forecast the destiny of fresh Russia. Russia needs the full Ukraine Even in 2004, it was clear that Moscow was fighting for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, fresh Russia could appear during the first (yeshchenkovian) coup. In 2004, alternatively of thechark mess created by Dobkin in 2014, the Northdonietsky convention of deputies of all levels worked successfully. uncovering a leader and getting him started with Russian service specialists wasn't a problem. Especially since there were no armed neo-Nazi gangs around the country, and the power in Kiev could not be legitimized without the "third round" of the election, then the capital and western Ukraine had no strong arguments against the opposition of the South West. (...) The situation of 2004 was fundamentally different from the situation of 2014 only 1 thing: the political conflict was not over, and it was possible to wipe out Yushchenko by peaceful means through elections. And then it happened. It was so not essential to make a war base against Kiev in the east. The efforts of Yanukovich and his crew for a political rematch and their forced orientation towards the pro-Russian electorate – the only 1 who could reconstruct him to power – proved to be sufficient. By opposing the EU on the position agreement, Moscow fought for the full Ukraine. Otherwise, it would not be wise to exert a sharp economical force on Yanukovich as early as August 2013 to show him what would happen after the signing of the association agreement with the EU. After all, the ruin of Ukraine and the inevitable terrible economical consequences (Janukovich is not Jaceniuk, his West would not even give what gives Jaceniuk) were guaranteed. All the more so, the cities of the South East, powerfully connected with the local industry, the first to experience the sad consequences and so on the hated association agreement. Moscow fought and fought for the full Ukraine. The Crimea had to occupy not due to the fact that the local Russians were more Russian than those from Donetsk or Kharkiv. And not due to the fact that Crimea has risen. Kharkiv was formed, and Crimean authorities, characterized by servilism towards the authoritative Kiev (if not counting Mieszkov's ambiguous presidency), were ready to give the peninsula to the junta without any conditions. But there was a Russian fleet in Crimea, and the bannermen went there not to run Russian activists, but to provoke the fleet to shoot. At the time, the main issue was to bring Russia into an armed conflict in Ukraine. Therefore, it was essential to give Crimea the position of Russian territory hastily, due to the fact that then the Kiev junta, attempting to cross Perekop, would have become an aggressor who swung on Russian soil. The US and the EU may not recognise the de jure of joining Crimea in Russia, but, in fact, it is Russian land and everyone has to face it. In general, all of Russia's activities during the fresh decade of Ukrainian crisis attest to Moscow's intention to integrate all of Ukraine into the Russian Eurasian task alternatively than part. The thing about the 2014 coup was that Ukraine would become 1 of the most crucial parts of the Customs Union and then the Eurasian economical Union. Russia hoped to establish a friendly political agreement in Kiev, which would start implementing an equal economical cooperation policy. It did not foresee direct political submission to Kiev, as it does not foresee the subordination of Moscow to Minsk or Astana. Of course, economical and military potential, besides the geographical location of Russia (its territory is the link binding the full Eurasia) makes it unambiguously a locomotive of post-Soviet integration. Russia besides provides cultural unity. Kazakhs and Armenians do not talk Ukrainian, but Russian. Reruption of the Russian planet Talk about the establishment of any Ukrainian state would be besides optimistic. Firstly, it will be essential to establish an external body for denazification. Secondly, an global military and police control will be required to disarm Nazi militants and bandits. Thirdly, it will take besides long to rebuild the economy and it will require immense investments. To put any unrealisticly large money in another's economy, without any guarantees that in a fewer years' time again in Kiev it would be inexcusable naivety. So Ukraine is needed all of Russia. Otherwise, the anticipation of complete purification of fresh York from the flags, even within 8 circuits, would already be fulfilled. Ukraine cannot be part of the integration of the Eurasian projects as an independent state, due to the fact that there is no state, and we would lose besides much time, energy and resources to rebuild it. This means that only 1 option remains – integration into the Euro-Asian space as part of Russia. Of course, Russia has developed rusophobia today, 40-50 percent of the population sees Russia as an enemy. But don't forget that most of them are Russian people, surrounded by hostile propaganda. Ukrainian – a word of territorial significance. From this point of view, Riazianic – not Russian either. He speaks Rianan, wears Rianan clothes. It has its ryan history, and in this story, Riazań has more than erstwhile bewildered the Grand Duchy of Vladimir and Moscow. Generally, Russian people, even partially derupt, must be reruptised. There's no another way. An empire rejecting territories, inhabited by indigenous imperial state-generated ethnos, just due to the fact that part of this ethnos fell into slavery to Nazi propaganda, undercut its own base. But if Belarus, with all its ruscour and economical dependence on Russia, is inactive able to be as a stand-alone state, and so the process of its reintegration into the Russian planet will be severely extended over time (inclusive mechanisms foretell the maximum possible degree of autonomy), then Ukraine has exhausted its capacity for independent state development. With her own strength, she will not appear from the chaos that her leaders brought her into. Moreover, all remaining part of independent Ukraine will be hostile to the Russian planet and will pose problems for Russia, the EU and Russian-European cooperation. You can't let the enemy stay on the threshold. In fact, Russia has no alternate to including the Ukrainian territory and the remaining population in the competent Russian state. At the same time, it is possible that any peripheral western areas may fall off and be attached to the territories of European neighbours (so as not to be besides outraged), but alternatively at this phase the Russian leadership finds the division of Ukraine undesirable. Declarations by the Kremlin and the Ministry of abroad Affairs of the FR on attachment to the thought of neutral national Ukraine (within the old borders, but without Crimea) are a tribute to the diplomatic convention, not a real plan. Who will force the people of Donbas and the Halicans to live in 1 country, who started a civilian war against Donbas. You gotta keep an expeditionary corps there that separates 2 hostile sides so that the country is not drawn into a bloody home conflict again. Indeed, in order to save Ukraine, it must be occupied. I am not convinced that there has already been an exact decision in the Kremlin where the western border of Russia should go after the Ukrainian crisis. With or without Galicia, but there won't be any peculiar problems. First, the hazing is easy and positively subject to force, so that they themselves will become the most active denasifiers (they like to conduct mirrors of all kinds). Secondly, present Ukraine is ruled by the most nationalist of possible authorities. They may be even more nationalistic, but then it will no longer be the central power, but the machnowskie "republik". Consequently, at this point, the Halitian nationalism falls into a logical contradiction – the "patriots" in power prove inferior to the "criminal regime". erstwhile the “patriots” are overthrown, the mid-statistical Halician will accept that Ukrainians cannot regulation themselves, so let anyone from outside rule. And since the West turned out to be incapable of taking work for Ukraine, only Russia remains. Thirdly, the halibuts will be pleased that it will be much easier to go to Tiumenia (for gas tankers) and Podmoskowia (for the remaining mass). In general, the biggest problem may be the besides massive entry of Halicans in the ranks of “Only Russia”. Time project? But for integration with Russia all over Ukraine, any fresh Russia needs no more than to make 1 Federation neutral Ukraine, meaning that it is not essential at all. Why make a fresh Russia if Kharkiv and Donetsk, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk peacefully integrate the circuit behind the circuit? Apart from that, if there is simply a fresh Russian state, it will shortly have its own political elite, who will want to take more from Russia than to give it. And then the thought of the fresh Russian people will be born – due to the fact that someway it is essential to justify the existence of the fresh Russian state. In the end, Russia will receive a fresh Ukraine at its borders for its own money, only under the name of fresh Russia. And it all starts over... I think it can be explained on a temporary basis, even at the moment, that, with the exception of the structures essential to carry out effective warfare, no another state institutions are created. Everything remains within the DRL/LRL, i.e. in fact at the regional level. And the erstwhile widely advertised parliament of Novorosia under the leadership of Oleg Cariewa is inactive a decorative body, in practice without influence on anything and nothing significant. For this reason, they are criticized by many appointments for executive positions in both republics for people with no authority but easy to control. Why make state structures erstwhile they're coming down soon? Why complete the leadership of Novorostia with competent, ambitious specialists erstwhile no 1 predicts the longer functioning of Novorostia? We request people who will leave without murmuring at a time and will not fight to preserve fresh Russian quasi statehood by pushing old colleagues sticks into spokes. What's the function of fresh York today? Firstly, as has already been said, it organises a opposition campfire against the junta in Ukrainian territory. Secondly, it forms a liberating army, capable of carrying out an offensive to Kiev and beyond - as shortly as the junta begins to fall apart and this begins. Thirdly, individual should declare their accession to Russia on behalf of all Ukraine. Why? Take her on another circuit? So the liberation of Ukraine from Nazism will be carried out formally by Ukrainian troops. The Army of Noworosia – is the same side of civilian war as the Kiev Army. Consequently, we are faced not with external aggression, but with interior combat. The winner in the civilian war is legitimized by the fact of winning, he does not request an additional card. The fresh Ukrainian government will have the right to any external political steps. At the same time, the decision to establish state unity between Ukraine and Russia will be justified by the fact that this is simply a forced consequence of a humanitarian disaster to which the Nazi government will be responsible, and the consequences of which cannot be corrected alone. In fact, the entry of Ukraine into Russia will besides correspond to the Nazis themselves and their supporters (those who will not be able to hide behind Ukraine's borders). The thing is, there was a regular judiciary in Russia, and the law protects everyone, regardless of ideological preferences. Therefore, Nazi supporters, if they did not shed blood, but only “warred” on social networks, can feel safe. And the establishment of power of the winners of the civilian war, who will compose their own rights, and so far will be guided by the "Revolutionary Motivation", full understood by the Barbarian shelling of Donetsk and Lugansk, after the Odski Chatyn and Melitopolski shooting, after hundreds of tortured antifascists, may not like many. So there are grounds to believe that Novorosja is simply a temporary project, planned for the time of civilian war and called for securing the war triumph and global justification for the liquidation of the Kiev neo-Nazi state, without formally involving Russia in this process. I am convinced that after the triumph of the army of Novorosia, the evidence of the savagery of the Kiev government will be more than adequate to make the planet community, including the number and supporters of the Kiev Nazis from the US and the EU, consider the fresh power legal. And erstwhile the legitimate and legal authority decides that the Russians of fresh Russia must necessarily return home – to historical Russia, then it will be besides late for outrage.".
Related
Is Russia utilizing poison gas on a large scale?
5 hours ago
recommended
Kalendarz – lipiec 2025
3 days ago
