Even the most perceptive of us may be the victim of well-prepared deception, and I fear that this is what happens to many Western people in connection with the alleged "stretches" between Russia and the West.
Many of them are well-acquainted with the central banks' cabals and its grip on the United States and Europe. However, any inexplicably do not think that global bankers are pulling strings besides in Russia, playing on both sides of the escalation of economical war..
If you believe Russia will save us from the fresh planet Order, this article is for you.
If you have lifted the veil of secrecy, looked a small deeper and felt that something is incorrect with the promoted rivalry between the West and Russia, this article will aid you consolidate your thoughts.
You may be curious in an article from 2014 entitled "Russia is besides dominated by global banks". This 2014 article and the next article, which follows, address akin topics related to preparation for where we are today. Our article "Burkina Faso: UN follows and controls exile monetary and assistance through digital identifiers"shows that not only the West and Russia are dominated and manipulated by self-appointed elites of financial interests.
The Danger of Cooptation and False Prophets
After a widely publicized interview by Tucker Carlson with Vladimir Putin and his later show of something that can only be described as "an ignorant man babbling one-dimensional bullshit in admiration for Russia at the supermarket," We are faced with an crucial issue: either Carlson is simply a master in controlled opposition, skillfully playing his part in a large geopolitical chess game; Or just masterfully do those who easy deceive, for clicks, views, remarks and money.
Even the most perceptive of us may be the victim of a well-preserved fraud, and I fear that this is what is happening to Carlson and another disappointed Western people in connection with the alleged "stretches" between Russia and the West.
In my erstwhile article "Why Globalists Designed Crisis in Ukraine"I have outlined the past of false paradigms and fabricated conflicts, all arranged by global financial interests to consolidate and centralize power.
The very emergence of communist Russia was financed by western banks and supported by military aid from the US government. (Read more HERE.) These uncomfortable truths are conveniently overlooked in our educational institutions, due to the fact that the continuous dominance of the money elite is based on perpetuating historical misconceptions.
Many of my readers are well-acquainted with the cabals of central banks and its grip over the US and Europe. However, any inexplicably do not think that global bankers are pulling strings besides in Russia, playing on both sides of the escalation of economical war.
As the Ukrainian crisis continues and another threats appear in the Pacific and the mediate East, a peculiar consensus has emerged among alternate analysts. They seem to believe that president Vladimir Putin, Russia and the holy body of BRICS constitute a bastion against globalisation and corporate financial governments.
Perhaps Putin's rhetoric and the presence of controlled media opposition puppets, specified as Carlson and the "impact" of "alternative" media on Twitter, has confused any of the American and European "awakened individuals" to view Russia as a "victim" of Western oligarchy, a brave "white knight" standing against the fresh planet Order. However, I must inform you that this cannot be further from reality.
The global financial elite is not a favorite; they play to win. They don't care about state boundaries or political ideology. They're puppet lords, and Putin, like many others, is just 1 of their puppets. To believe otherwise is to fall victim to the top deception that can have tragic consequences for the full world.
The revival of Russia as a regional federation in the 1990s, after the collapse of the russian Union, was arranged by the global elite, with Mikhail Gorbachev as her puppet.
Gorbachev, who is frequently credited with the dismantling of the russian Union and the emergence of a "new" Russia, has long been a supporter of a centralised global government or "New planet Order", as he called it.
In a speech to Lafayette College students in Easton, Pennsylvania, Gorbachev lamented that the opportunities created by the end of the Cold War had not been decently exploited and that the planet was inactive facing crises specified as environmental degradation, poorness and food shortages. He argued that these problems could only be addressed by establishing a global governance system.
Asked in 1995 by San Francisco Weekly, what Gorbachev meant by "New planet Order", Jim Garrison, executive manager of the Gorbachev Foundation, replied that Gorbachev advocated for nothing but a global government. Garrison predicted that specified a government would be established over the next 20-30 years, which seems increasingly likely, given the fresh pursuit of the global currency.
Gorbachev imagined that this global government would be achieved by global organisations specified as the United Nations, the global Monetary Fund and the planet Bank. However, it is clear that this imagination is not limited to Gorbachev and his immediate surroundings.
In 1995, at the Gorbachev planet State Forum, a associate of the abroad Relations Council, Zbigniew Brzeziński stated that progressive regionalisation was a prerequisite for final globalisation, as it would lead to the creation of larger, more unchangeable and more cooperative units.
"We have no fresh planet Order. ...We can't jump into a planet government with 1 fast step. ... In short, the prerequisite for final globalisation – a genuine globalisation – is progressive regionalisation, due to the fact that in this way we are moving towards larger, more unchangeable and more cooperative individuals. —Zbigniew Brzeziński
In another words, global elites usage regionalisation as a step towards the eventual goal of global governance. And Russia led by Vladimir Putin plays in their favor.
Despite his rhetoric, Putin is nothing more than a socialist puppet serving the interests of the global elite at the expense of the Russian people. The false dichotomy of Russia versus the West is nothing more than a distraction, a trick to keep us divided and conquered. The real enemy is the global financial elite, and it is time for many of them to recognise and take appropriate action.
In Zbigniew K. Brzeziński's book "Between 2 Ages: America's function In The Technetronic Era" (Between 2 Ages: America's function in the Technetronic Era)) presents a clear image of the ideology behind the fresh planet Order. Brzeziński argues that the concept of national sovereignty is no longer realistic and that more intensive efforts should be made to form a fresh planet monetary structure. He goes on to say that Marxism is another vital and creative state in the ripening of the universal imagination of man and that it is at the same time the triumph of reason over faith.
Brzeziński's views coincide with Gorbachev's views, and it is worth noting that Brzeziński was close and influential Barack Obama's abroad Policy Advisor. This is simply a clear indication that striving for a fresh planet Order and a global government in a decisively socialist or Marxist form is not just a relic of the past, but a continuous effort of political interests on both sides.
New Russia was designed to service as a catalyst for global governance, but who precisely is the global elite that seeks to establish this fresh planet order? The answer, as always, lies in following the money.
After the collapse of the Russian economy and the dissolution of the erstwhile russian Union, the country urgently needed financial assistance. Between 1992 and 1996, the global Monetary Fund ("IMF") intervened in the Russian economy, offering (officially) aid of over $22 billion. However, this first debt package was presented as a failure erstwhile Russia failed to repay its debts, and IMF loans were resumed in the late 1990s until today.
While many know about the IMF's engagement in Russia, fewer know about the scandal of where these IMF funds went specifically. In 1999, it was revealed that IMF money went to the Russian corporate elite, politicians, and even gangsters. The money was to be utilized to rebuild Russian infrastructure and economy, but alternatively it hitin your hand Aristocracy and a criminal underworld.
The money was redirected and washed by Bank of fresh York, an institution founded in 1784 by no 1 but an internationalist agent and promoter of Alexander Hamilton's central bank. The bank changed ownership as a consequence of the merger in 2007 and is presently called The Bank Of fresh York Mellon.
The IMF's first reaction to the scandal was to shed responsibility, claiming that it had no power over the funds after being transferred to the Central Bank of Russia ("CBR"). However, as more and more evidence of mismanagement or disappearance of funds appears, the IMF commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to carry out a CBR audit.
The results of this audit were never made public. In 1999, the Russian government admitted to hiding over $50 billion in a subsidiary bank in the Channel Islands, any of which came from the IMF's help. erstwhile CBR president Sergei Dubinin maintained that the IMF was full aware of the recipients of these measures.
Several Russian officials, ranging from the Chief State Auditor, by the Minister of interior Security, to the lawyer General, provided information confirming evidence that IMF funds were transferred to unintended recipients. The president of the Duma safety Committee stated that any IMF loans had never even reached Russia, and were alternatively deposited in secret abroad accounts of the highest rank of Russian officials.
Despite admitting guilt and evidence, IMF auditors refused to admit corruption or misconduct during their investigations. It could be assumed that they would exhaust all efforts to discover where their funds are and why they are misused.
However, the reason for the cover-up is clear: the IMF knew precisely who was getting the money. The first rescue packages for Russia aimed at ensuring cooperation between the Russian political and corporate elite and ensuring that the future trajectory of the country would be consistent with the globalistic agenda.
Let's decision to the present and Putin continues the secret relations between Russia and the IMF. In 2009 Putin advocated the establishment of a "super reserve currency" under the control of the IMF, utilizing the IMF peculiar Drawing Rights basket as a basis.
Why would Putin, allegedly an anti-globalist nationalist leader, want the IMF, allegedly an organization controlled by the US, to be a global controller of the global economy? The answer is simple: the IMF is not a US-controlled institution; It is an institution controlled by bankers. And Putin is simply a globalist, not a nationalist.
The withdrawal of Crimea from Ukraine and its annexation to Russia was partially provoked by the broad concessions requested by the IMF in exchange for loans to Ukraine. 1 of these concessions afraid the transfer of Ukrainian gas pipelines to American Chevron. Crimean leaders accused Kiev politicians of betraying Ukraine to global bankers.
However, it was the Russian Finance Minister and Putin who initially advocated the IMF's rescue of Ukraine. In fact, Putin wanted Ukraine to "She sold"to Western financiers.
The Russian central bank is besides a associate of the Bank of global Settlements ("BIS"), an exclusive club of global banking elites. Founded in 1930, BIS served as a center of globalisation until planet War II, erstwhile evidence arose that the organization was helping the Nazis, financing the German war machine, washing money for Gestapo officers and hiding funds robbed in Europe by the 3rd Reich.
Despite the scandal, BIS exists to this day, and Carroll Quigley, a associate of the abroad Relations Council, an elite insider and mentor of Bill Clinton, said about BIS in his book "Tragedy and Hope":
The power of financial capitalism had yet another far-reaching goal, no little or less, only to make a global financial control strategy in private hands capable of dominant the political strategy of each country and the economy of the planet as a whole. This strategy was to be feudally controlled by the central banks of the world, acting in agreement, through secret agreements concluded at frequent private meetings and conferences.
The top of the strategy was to be the Bank of global Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by global central banks, which themselves were private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of people like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the national Reserve Bank in fresh York City, Charles Rist of the Bank of France and Hjalmar Schacht of Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control taxation loans, manipulate currencies, influence the level of economical activity in the country. and influencing co-operating politicians through subsequent economical benefits in the business world.
Prior to the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine, Putin was elevated to the character rank in most corporate media. TIME Magazine, a long-standing globalist publication, published even on the front page an article with the slogan: "America is weak and shaky. Russia is rich and reborn – and its leader does not care what others think of it".
Today, it is worrying how much admiration and worship for Putin awakens disappointed Westerners. While any may see him as a hero in the fight against globalisation and the fresh planet Order, the fact is that Russia and the US are only false champions dueling in a false gladiator match paid by the IMF.
The war against Syria was not thwarted by Putin's intervention, but alternatively due to the tireless efforts of alternate media in revealing lies behind Syrian rebellion and CIA engagement in Al-Qaeda. It is independent journalism that deserves designation for thwarting the globalist plan to usage Syria as an inflammatory event for a false confrontation between the US and Russia.
The most frightening aspect of this false paradigm is the anticipation of cooptation of freedom supporters in America. If we are drawn into supporting Russia or any controlled government, we will lose sight of our mission of truly free and sovereign America.
We must accept that the future of human freedom rests solely on our shoulders. There is no another nation that would come to our aid in combating a globalistic agenda, nor will BRICS service as an "alternative model". The omission of ever-increasing evidence – criminalization of freedom of expression in Brazil, advanced efforts for CBDC and digital recognition in Russia, the inhuman Aadhaar strategy in India, the social credit strategy in China – to preserve its intact fragile worldview, seems common on all sides of the political spectrum.
We must defy the temptation to follow false prophets and artificial protagonists. The conflict for freedom and sovereignty will not be won by supporting controlled governments or submission to false paradigms created by the elite.
Only through our own efforts and opposition can we hope to accomplish a truly free and sovereign America. The sooner we accept this reality, the stronger we will be erstwhile the fight begins.
About the Author
Lily Bit describes herself as a erstwhile intelligence agent analyzing the large Reset, the 4th Industrial Revolution, propaganda, totalitarianism, current narratives, psychology and history. You can subscribe and track A Lily Bit on Substack HERE.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://expose-news.com/
