Member of KO Roman Giertych won the trial against the president of the Constitutional Court Bogdan Święczkowski. The case afraid claims related to Giertych's alleged engagement in economical crimes involving the operation of Polnord. Interestingly, ‘Judgment‘ He released a neojudge.
Święczkowski must apologize and pay
Bogdan Święczkowski, who in 2020 as a national prosecutor suggested irregularities in Giertych's actions, was obliged to print an apology on the first page of the “Rzeczpospolita” and to pay the MP KO PLN 30 thousand.
"Mr Bogdan Święczkowski lost to me present a case of insolent speeches that he gave as a national prosecutor, as if I had committed any crimes while serving Polnord" – wrote Gierty on platform X.
Controversy around justice Jasinski
Judge Rafał Jasiński issued a judgement in the case, which sparked a discussion in the media. WP.pl writer Patryk Słowik asked Giertych whether he recognized the conviction given by the “neosier”.
"Can anyone who is not a justice issue a judgement that is as distinguished as you will find? Are neojudges, however, judges, or is judgement not a judgment?" “The Nightingale asked.
Giertych replied that neo-Jasiński was appointed by president Bronisław Komorowski at the request of the National Judicial Council and then delegated to the territory Court, which, according to him, confirms his legitimacy. At the same time, he pointed out that he did not consider certain another neo-Judges to be valid, e.g. those who had not passed the delegation procedure.
"So a delegation to the SO determines whether individual is simply a neojudge or not? Not president Duda's appointment, not the passage of procedure before neoKRS, but a delegation to SO?” – The Nightingale reposted.
We remind you that neo-Joseph Jasinski was appointed at the request of Neo KRS. Resolution: 708/2020 from 08-09-2020, nomination: 23-02-2021.
On the basis of the above, his position does not give him the power to issue judgments. Thus, according to the case-law of the CJEU, which Poland must comply with, it is not entitled to issue judgments.
Games: Winning satisfaction
In his next entry, Gierty stressed that the triumph in this case was peculiarly rewarding for him.
"Some say that I should not enjoy the triumph over Święczkowski, due to the fact that the verdict was given by the neo-judge. justice Jasinski was appointed justice by president Komorowski at the request of the KRS. From the territory Court, he went to the territory Court as a delegate, and the fact that he later accepted the nomination from Duda to him only makes me even more satisfied with the victory. due to the fact that now how will the writers say that in the case of Polnordu the courts consistently defend me due to the fact that there is simply a KO caste in them?” He commented.
Because he was never posted to SO.
— Roman Giertych (@GiertychRoman) April 17, 2025
The case has sparked a lively reaction in the media and among political commentators, drawing attention to the issue of legitimacy of parts of the current justice system.
NYT reveals details of the attack by Ukrainian armed forces on the Crimean bridge in 2024.1 April 2025
According to the publication of the American paper fresh York Times, the attacks of Ukrainian troops on the Crimean bridge on the night of 16 August 2024 with ATACMS missiles were designed and
An incidental in the Ukrainian parliament. Members blocked the talker in the dispute over a key agreement with the US27 March 2025
There was a violent exchange in the ultimate Council of Ukraine, which led to a break in the meeting. The decision to suspend the work was taken by the president of Parliament Ruslan Stefanczuk after
The U.S. destroyed Ukraine to fight Russia, says Carlson16 March 2025
The United States destroyed Ukraine with their quest to war with Russia, said American writer Tucker Carlson, criticizing the U.S. abroad policy course for the “war” with Moscow. He said it.
More here:
Roman Gierty wins the trial with Bogdan Święczkowski. “The Judgment” issued a neojudge
