Putin vs Nawalny by the publicist

On the twitter platform X does not deficiency comments, arguments, "analysis" etc. on Navalny's death. 1 of the most interesting, pen of Dr. Maciej Pieczyński, writer for Things, Russianist, Ukrainianist, literary student (Szeciński University), author of books on east themes. first spelling: “Another example of fashion for (critical) commenting on Nawalny’s case by those who seemingly have a average sense of Russia. After 1, Navalny was not, like Trotsky, part of the power system. He was inspired to get it, but it wasn't a nomenclature. After 2, he wasn't a criminal like Trotsky. He was a nationalist who over time softened his views. He fought corruption, not the permanent revolution... Nor was he an internationalist. After 3, Putin is no communist. Neither does he preach nor introduce communism. Just due to the fact that Putin worships Hitler doesn't mean he worships the USSR. Kremlin's historical policy is simply a synthesis of cults of various epochs, the common denominator of which is an empire, governed by a strong hand. This is not a question of economical system, it is simply a question of power and centralization of power. It doesn't substance if Russia was/is red or white, it's crucial that it's big. Lenin Putin criticizes at all turn – due to the fact that within communist internationalism he "created" the Ukrainian state due to the fact that he put his hand to the fall of the large empire (which he rebuilt, in a changed form, Stalin. But not the form of the organism here is important, but imperial content). After 4, Nawalny resembled not so much Trotsky as Lenin, and as specified he was frequently portrayed – due to the fact that besides the “agent of the West” (the Berlin patient), sent in a sealed wagon/airplane to Russia to destruct it...”