In Russia there is presently no practically day without any analysis of the end of the war in Ukraine. All this after interview with Patrushev, in which he said it is not excluded that in 2025 Ukraine would cease to be and Moldova would either become part of another state or vanish from the planet map. Patruszev was a longtime head of intelligence, he is now head of Putin's advisors and associate of the safety Council. It is so individual from the “internal circle”. individual like that knows what he's saying.
The name Sergei Karaganov has already appeared respective times on my blog. There's a reason. His word means a lot in Russia. It is possibly the highest-valued analyst. And no uncertainty the most controversial. First time I mentioned him. After proposing a preventive atomic attack for any intent in the West in June 2023. The most effective way to calm histeric is to put his mouth on him so that he can come to his senses in time and not lead to greater misfortune. That was Karaganov's advice. I have mentioned many times that if Putin is criticized in Russia, it is for "softness" towards the West. It is easy to know that Karaganov is 1 of specified critics. erstwhile it comes to Putin's criticism, I'm talking about serious media. The media is "bruck" or "sewing" due to the fact that specified in Russia besides exist, full of criticism of Putin, which is almost no different from the nonsense written in the West. This “almost” concerns the charge of being a dictator. Putin is so popular in Russia that even the “dumb Ivan” will not believe in specified a charge.
Just a couple of days ago, I got my eye on him. Karaganova article on the preparation of a group of Russian experts and advisors for possible talks with the fresh US leadership. Text It's incredibly interesting. especially from our European point of view! Here he is.
Start of translation.
Breaking the backbone of Europe: what should Russia's policy towards the West be?
Trump's election temporarily halted our policies towards the West, including the ongoing war in Ukraine. We did not respond besides harshly (and rightly) to the provocations of the rear Bidenov Guard, but our soldiers continued offensive operations and crushing forces of Western mercenaries in Ukraine.
Now, from all sides, we are talking about the anticipation of compromise, its contours. In our country, at least in the media, specified options besides began to be discussed.
Together with colleagues, we are presently preparing a wide-ranging survey and situation analysis on the improvement of recommendations for Russian policies towards the West. I will not anticipate the result of the discussion, but I will simply share any preliminary thoughts. They can be useful erstwhile preparing the study and aim to prepare the ground for a wider discussion.
The Trump administration now has no serious reason to negociate with us on the terms we set. War is economically beneficial to the United States due to the fact that it allows them to bargain from allies with dual energy, update their military-industrial complex and impose their economical interests through systemic sanctions on dozens of countries worldwide. And, of course, proceed to do harm to Russia in anticipation of its destruction, and in the optimal variant for the US – to fall or destruct it from the game as a military-strategic core rising and liberating planet Majority, a powerful strategical pillar of the main competitor – China. Although this war is unnecessary and even a bit harmful from the point of view of interior politics, the balance of interests is alternatively in favour of continuing it.
Let us put ourselves in Trump's place – an American nationalist with elements of conventional messianism, but without the globalistic-liberal scale of the last 3 or 4 decades and Biden's engagement in Ukrainian corruption programs. Only 3 things can make this conventional Trump deal that suits us. The first is the threat of Afghanistan-2, the full defeat and disgraceful escape of the government in Kiev, and the demonstration defeat of the West led by America. The second is Russia's departure from the actual alliance with China. The 3rd is the threat of military action in the United States and their key possessions, accompanied by the mass death of Americans (including the demolition of military bases).
Complete failure is necessary, but without much more active usage of atomic deterrence it will be extremely, if not besides costly, requiring the death of thousands of the best sons of our homeland. It is absurd for us to leave the alliance with China. If the Trumpists of the first word tried to convince us to do so, now they realize that Russia will not agree to this. More about the atomic origin later.
For the current Euro-Elit, Euro-Integrators, war is urgently needed. Not only due to the hope of weakening conventional geopolitical rivals, revenge for the failures of the last 3 centuries, but besides due to russophobia. These elites and their Euro-bureaucracy are failing at almost all point. The Europroject is bursting.
The usage of Russia as a bogeyman and now as a actual enemy, which has lasted for more than a decade, is the main tool for legitimizing their plan and maintaining the power of the euro-elite. Moreover, "strategic parasitism" – the deficiency of fear of war – has become much stronger in Europe than in the United States. Not only do Europeans not want to think about what this might mean to them, but they don't know how to think about it anymore. Since russian times, based on the experience of cooperation with de Gaulle, Mitterrand, Brandt, Schroeder and others, we have been accustomed to reasoning of Americans as the main initiators of confrontation and militarization of politics in the West. It's not precisely true, and now it's not actual at all. Churchill was the 1 who pulled the U.S. into a cold war erstwhile it seemed beneficial to him. It was the European strategists (then they inactive existed) and not the Americans that started the rocket crisis in the 1970s. Examples can be exchanged for a long time. Now Euro-elites are the main sponsors of the Kiev junta. Forgetting that it was their predecessors who started 2 planet wars, they are pushing Europe and the planet towards the third. By sending Ukrainian cannonball meat to slaughter, they prepare fresh east Europeans from many Balkan countries, Romania and Poland. They began deploying mobile bases where they train quotas of possible Landsknechts. They will effort to proceed the war not only to the “last Ukrainian”, but shortly to the “last east European”.
The anti-Russian propaganda of NATO and Brussels already surpasses Hitler's propaganda. Even individual relationships with Russia are systematically broken. Those who advocate average relationships are poisoned and thrown out of work. A totalitarian liberal ideology is imposed. Even the appearances of democracy are forgotten, although they are inactive mentioned. The latest example is the cancellation of presidential election results in Romania, which the candidate from outside Brussels won.
European elites are not only clearly preparing their societies and countries for war. Even approximate dates were given erstwhile they could be ready to start.
How do we halt crazy people? halt the process of approaching planet War III, at least in Europe? How do we end the war?
Talks about compromises and ceasefire revolve around freezing fights on the current frontline. This will enable Ukrainian remnants to be re-armed and, complementing them by quotas from another countries, a fresh circular of war activities will be launched. We'll gotta fight again. And from a little favorable political position. specified a compromise can and must be presented as a victory. But it will not be our victory, but, rather plainly speaking, the triumph of the West. This will be seen around the world. And in many ways we will see it that way too.
I will not list all the tools to avoid this scenario. I'll just name the most crucial ones. Firstly, we must yet tell ourselves, the planet and our opponents what is obvious. Europe is the origin of all the top disasters of humanity, 2 planet wars, genocide, anti-human ideology, colonialism, racism, Nazism and so on. The metaphor of the celebrated European policy on Europe as a "splitting garden" sounds much more realistic if we call it a field covered in dense weeds, blooming in caries hundreds of millions of murdered, robbed, enslaved. And around it is simply a garden of ruins of crushed and plundered civilizations and nations. Europe must be called as it deserves, so that the threat of atomic weapons should be more convincing and justified.
Secondly, to draw attention to another apparent truth: any war between Russia and NATO/EU will inevitably take a atomic character or escalate to atomic level if the West continues to fight against us in Ukraine. This tip is necessary, inter alia, to limit the developing arms race. There is no point in gathering immense arsenals of conventional weapons if the armies equipped with them and the countries themselves that sent these armies will inevitably be swept distant by a atomic tornado.
Thirdly, it is essential to advance for a fewer more months, crushing the enemy to pulp. But the sooner, the better, we must announce that our patience, our willingness to sacrifice in the name of triumph over this bastard their people will shortly be over and we will announce the price – for all killed Russian soldier a 1000 Europeans will die if they do not halt surrendering to their rulers and proceed to wage war with Russia. We must tell the Europeans directly: your elite will make you another batch of cannon meat, and we, if the war takes a atomic character, will not be able to defend the civilian population of Europe as we effort to do in Ukraine. We'll inform you about the blows, as Vladimir Putin promised, but atomic weapons are even little selective than conventional weapons. Of course, at the same time, European elites must be confronted with the fact that they and their place of residence will be the first targets of atomic retaliation. They won't make it out alive.
A It should simply be said to the Americans that if they proceed to throw timber into the fire of the Ukrainian conflict, in a fewer steps we will cross the atomic Rubicon, we will hit their allies, and if there is no atomic response, as they threatened, there will be atomic attack on their bases in Europe and worldwide. If they dare to respond with atomic weapons, they will receive a atomic strike on their own territory.
Fourthly, proceed to strengthen our army, which is essential in a very troubled and crisis-stricken world. But at the same time, it is not only essential to change the atomic doctrine, which, thank God, has already begun, but besides to resume, if Americans and their supporters do not want to negotiate, a decisive decision up the atomic escalation ladder to increase the effectiveness of our atomic deterrence and retaliation forces. "Leszczyna" [Oreshnik] is simply a large weapon, let glory be its producers and creators, but it is not a substitute for atomic weapons, it is just another effective rung on the escalation ladder.
Fifth, we request to tell the United States through various channels that we do not want to humiliate them and are ready to aid them with the dignified exit from the Ukrainian disaster, which the Americans were drawn into by the liberals-globalists and Europeans.
But most importantly, we must realise that we cannot and do not have the right to show indecision in our actions for our country, our citizens and humanity. Not only the destiny of Russia is at stake, but besides the destiny of human civilization in its present form.
If the Americans withdraw, Ukraine will be defeated rather quickly. Its east and south will come to Russia. A demilitarized, neutral state with no-fly region over it, will be formed in the center and west of the present Ukraine, and anyone who does not want to live in Russia and obey our rights can go there. The ceasefire would have been concluded.
And after the ceasefire, we will gotta work together to solve the problems of humanity with friends from the planet Majority. And even with the Americans, if they do. At the same time, Europe must be urgently removed from tackling the world's problems. erstwhile again, it becomes a major threat to itself and the world.
Peace on the subcontinent can only be established if Europe's spine is broken again, as it did as a consequence of our victories over Napoleon and Hitler, and erstwhile there is simply a generational change in the current elites. And then it will not happen in a narrow European context – it is the past – but in a European-Asian context.
End of translation.
Like me, Karaganov believes that the US has no interest in the fast end of the war in Ukraine. Like me sees besides that this war gives the United States an chance not only to weaken, but even to rob its vassals. Our (with and without quotes) media are now full of concerns that Russia will deal with the US without Europe. These fears are not unfounded. No sensible man talks to the stooges. Karaganov says the same thing. He's talking even more! The stooges request to be isolated, due to the fact that they are mostly the ones pushing the boss into war. According to Karaganov, Western Europe is the origin of all disasters. Western Europe colonized and robbed the remainder of the planet for 500 years. This is where the most criminal ideologies arose: Nazism, communism, Zionism and flagism. This is where 2 planet wars broke out. It was Western Europe, in the form of Napoleon and Hitler, that attacked Russia and now plans to do the same with the people of east Europe. It can be exchanged further, but Karaganov's proposal is one: to break Europe's spine and to prevent it from deciding the destiny of the world.
In my opinion, Karaganov's analysis is entirely correct from an ideological point of view. But at this point of view, she has a flaw. Like all ideologists, Karaganov besides does not realize that all ideologies are not derived from anything and are not born in vacuum. This includes wars and all another events. I mentioned it before. as Cardinal Farley said at the planet Eucharistic legislature in Lourdes, in July 1914. He said that the coming war (i.e. the First planet War) is simply a war of capital with the 3 manors of Europe, which stand in the way of taking power by the capital and at the same time taking power over the world. Historians, ideologists, and behind them all, we will not even think that specified Napoleon or Hitler had to come to power first. You don't march to Paris with a bunch of thugs or tirades in a Munich beer shop! individual in these people saw the possible and most of all gave money first to gain power and then to war. Wars that Napoleon and Hitler didn't plan. They were their performers. actual planners and actual war criminals are inactive unknown.
We're excited to get to Trump's power. Yes, many of his decisions are commendable! But let us not imagine that they are motivated by concern for our welfare! Trump, like “our” president, is just a pen. He gets papers to sign. These others have decided that the current methods of controlling society and state do not pass the exam, so they request to be changed. They made Trump president due to the fact that he believes in these changes and will make them for them. Of course, it will not be without conflict and everything will not succeed, due to the fact that this behind-the-clock power (not only so-called. deep state!) is not uniform and will defend its positions and influences.
But the destiny of the planet as usual will be determined by the power behind the money. This power is not only invisible, but the majority of society not only completely does not realize its methods of action but does not even fishy its existence and will be excited by the decisions of politicians.
What else can you add? 1 can only pray that Russia will end this war before we are pushed into it, due to the fact that this will defend us from corrupt politicians and our own stupidity.
