prof. Andrzej Nowak is an outstanding historian and excellent erudite. The very titles of his last lectures “Home and homeland, roots of patriotism‘, ‘Independence: fight, sacrifice, resignation” are evidence of large concern for our Homeland and a deep, analytical knowing of historical processes. That is why prof. Andrzej Nowak has the right and even the work to talk on issues crucial to the safety and future of Poland.

prof. Andrzej Nowak writes that "the readiness to leave is simply a measurement of maturity". But was it not in the human dimension the measurement of maturity and in the spiritual dimension the measurement of holiness, that John Paul II's existence at the Peter's Capital, in spite of the gradually leaving forces? Was Benedict XVI's abdication a measurement of maturity or alternatively a measurement of the drama of the Church and of Satan's influence? Poland is threatened by aggression and in a state of interior conflict already marked by martial law. In specified situations, erstwhile a conflict is fought, should the chief commander be changed to a younger 1 whose key attribute is this youth? possibly you request to do a broad conscience check, a conscience check at the lower levels, all the way down to each of us?
I want prof. Andrzej Nowak had asked another question. Questions about whether it is any people in the vicinity of Jarosław Kaczyński who should leave? Each leader, though yet making his own decisions, acquires information through his associates. Does not Jarosław Kaczyński have alleged "fat cats", people who are attracted to the achieved position, filter or even alter the information suflicted to the President? I don't think of any circumstantial people here, I'm far from the politics to handle names. But in specified a publicist text, it's not about names, it's about a problem. Example. Even in the erstwhile word of the Sejm Monika Pawłowska, the left-wing activist of the Spring organization Robert Biedronia changed club colours, joining the Jarosław Gowin Agreement to yet go to the PiS parliamentary club. Shortly thereafter, she became a associate of the PiSu and was included in the party's electoral lists in the fresh parliamentary elections. She did not win the parliamentary mandate, but took the first "reserved" place on the territory list. And now, contrary to the laws in force and against the Constitution, she has declared her willingness to take the mandate in place of Mr Mariusz Kamiński, who, after all, remains a legitimate associate by decision of the Court. Monika Pawłowska, as a dry left-wing activist, stabbed in the back of the right-wing formation. And that's the kind of thing to ask questions about. individual recommended Mrs. Pawłowski as a associate of the PiSu, individual put her on the electoral lists, and I do not believe that this was a individual initiative of Jarosław Kaczyński. specified decisions are unforgivable errors or conscious sabotage. And specified decisions should be accounted for, even if they concern people from the immediate surroundings of Jarosław Kaczyński.
And 1 step at a time, down to the bottom of the organization and social hierarchy. The question must be raised whether local activists of right-wing parties and groups have decently engaged in fresh parliamentary elections? I am not reasoning about the run itself, but, above all, about ensuring the transparency and fairness of these choices. It is said that in over 600 100 PiS electoral commissions, he had no representatives. The media has besides made public the scandalous cases of voting after the end of the election silence, even after the first election results were announced. But did anyone effort to see why it was on these peculiar committees that lined up these lines? I heard of a case where 2 commissions were in 1 building, entrances to them were adjacent. In both, about 1,800 people voted for the alleged certificates. People who come from another region in an unknown building have 2 entrances to 2 committees. The probability bill is inexorable, about half of the people should go to each of these 2 committees. However, it turned out that about 1,600 people entered 1 and only about 200 in the another committee. Was the reason for specified an asymmetry that the first commission was not a individual delegated by the Law and Justice?
Each of us should ask ourselves whether and how he reacted erstwhile a associate of the committee broke the law and the voter silence asked whether to issue us a referendum vote card? Did we call the police to study the crime? Each of us should ask ourselves, did we vote at all and how did we vote? Didn't we waste our vote putting a cross on PJJ's organization Rafal Piech? Have we attempted to convince those who have undergone this agential action to break up the right-wing electorate? due to the fact that regardless of the mistakes and faults of the United Right camp, Jarosław Kaczyński was not the direct origin of the defeat, but besides decent and decent people who believed in the heresy that Rafał Piech appeared to Our Lady. These people, with their voices, paved the way for power and demolition of the Polish state.
It is hard to deny the rightness of substantive allegations, which prof. Andrzej Nowak makes in his response. But they should get the author to reflect more widely than just the conclusion that Jarosław Kaczyński must go. I will effort briefly to address the first of these allegations, which is “failure to explain and account for what happened on April 10, 2010It’s okay. ” It hurts, it hurts, and it hurts. But we must honestly admit that we have had an explanation. It was developed, presented and published a study of the Smolensk Subcommittee, which minute after minute, seconds after second reproduces the course of events. This study is consistent, logical, reflects and explains all the consequences of what happened. It explains in an undeniable way the explosions that led to the complete demolition of the aircraft and the death of all its passengers. We know precisely where and what explosives have been placed and where and how the detonators were installed. On the method side, we know precisely how the assassination was carried out. There is indeed no accountability and no accountability. But the question here is, what was the United Right Government expected to do after this study was published? To declare war on Russia? And the second question, even harder and even more painful. What to do with people who treat the password hidden under 8 stars in a completely literal way. These people know it was an assassination and they think it was good. It was good that individual eliminated president Lech Kaczyński from Polish politics. Brutal and unbelievable, but true. And in this matter, and in many others, nothing will change the new, younger leader of the party, especially if he is deprived of the charism of the actual leader. We request to realize this and we request to change.
Mr Bogdan