Prison Service reported that convicted of the execution of PiS activist Mark Rosiak Ryszard Cyba cannot be punished in a prison facility. After a forensic examination, the man was transferred to a medical facility on March 18.
Paweł Jabłoński at the MS conference
This decision sparked opposition from PiS politicians, including Paweł Jabłoński, who appeared on Conference with Vice-Chiefs of the Ministry of Justice — Maria Ejchart and Darius Mazur.
Prior to the policy, he informed on X that "The Ministry of Justice tried to block Members of the Polish Parliament from entering the press conference – but ineffectively". He added that he hada list of questions he intends to ask the Deputy Chief of the Ministry. Among them, among others, about why Cyba was released, who made that decision and erstwhile he would return to prison.
— We here present were 12 with parliamentary control, but the Minister could not accept us. Then the minister invited her to a conference to ask a question. any answers have already been answered, but fresh ones are emerging. I besides talk as an attorney. Executive conduct is governed by its rights. The prosecution plays an crucial function in this procedure, e.g. may submit applications to experts. The question is, did the prosecutor’s office always question these conditions... regarding the suspension of punishment? — Jablonski spoke.
— You know the grounds for suspension. Among them is simply a long - word illness that allows punishment to be carried out, she answered 1 of Ejchart’s questions.
After a while Member was invited to a separate gathering after the conference.
Richard Cyba got out of prison. These are the reasons
The territory Court in Łódź, on 25 February, suspended the execution of the prison conviction against Ryszard Cyba, who in 2011 heard a life conviction for the execution of PiS activist Mark Rosiak and the attack on Paweł Kowalski, Assistant associate Jarosław Jagiełła.
In the message of reasons, the court stated that Richard Cyba had been examined by 2 experts of psychiatrists. They decided that The man is incapable to carry out prison sentences. He was diagnosed with intellectual disorders “which do not anticipate cures or even improvements.”
They noted that further advancement should be expected. 1 of the topics is the deep impairment of cognitive functions, complete confusion, sensitization, the presence of confabulation and the deficiency of logical contact. The psychiatry opinion indicated the request for constant care and care in the conditions of a care and treatment establishment or a home of social assistance.
