A period ago, on behalf of the planet economical Forum, Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari announced that Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter AI) should rewrite or rewrite/improve the Bible text. No more details are given on what this rewrite/amendment would consist of, but that the revised text would be the basis for uniting all people, so it cannot hurt anyone.
What can hurt people in the Bible? In the case of Harari, the substance is simple and related to his phobia towards all revealed religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam), prohibiting homosexual relations and relationships. Harari could never forgive Bible passages of himself, specified as the celebrated one: “You will not be with a man, as you are with a female – that is an abomination” from Leviticus 18:22. Let us add that many passages of the Scriptures are not simply “homophobic” but dictates that men who commit specified conduct be punished with death.
Klaus Schwab never spoke of Christianity in a way as hateful as Harari. On the contrary, in his The 4th Industrial Revolution We find in a fewer places expressed belief that after this title revolution – as a consequence of which AI and robots will expel most people from the labour marketplace and most of us are to be hereditaryly unemployed – people will have tremendous intellectual problems due to the fact that they will be expendable and feel expendable. Then comes the golden age of psychiatrists and clergymen, who, respectively, will treat the intellectual problems of humanity with pills and preachers. Only that this means that the task of the clergy will not be evangelization, but psychotherapy, and the Church itself (churches) would turn into a giant psychotherapist and charity establishment. Priests will not be afraid with Christ's carrying, leading the faithful to salvation, but will become specified a NGO providing intellectual and material aid to the human masses disinherited in the next phase of globalist capitalism, erstwhile the planet will be from proverbial A to Z administered by financier and AI. For this reason, it is hard to respect Schwab's attitude towards the Church as clearly hostile, at least not to the ecclesiastical institution (we are not talking about the truths of faith). In the Spanish press, I even found a letter from Pope Francis to the participants of the planet economical Forum in Davos, to which Klaus Schwab replied with a letter of thanks to the Bishop of Rome.
Globalist environments have abandoned the conventional tactics of fighting religion, A church and churches straight. From Robespierre to Bierut, this maneuver was mostly not successful, The Church did not make concessions, and the faithful stood on his side. Hence, the tactics which Carl Schmitt utilized to mention to as ‘neutralisation’ (Nm. Neutralisierung). This was not about a frontal attack on Christ and the priests, but to propose a lukewarm vigilance and to guarantee the convenience of an agreement: we do not straight attack the Church, we do not jail and we do not persecute for our faith, and we will even spend a penny on the government or on the Union, but in return the Church must "adapt" to the fresh era. In exchange for sacred peace and prosperity for priests, for money for the renovation of sacral buildings, for taxation reliefs, for grants, the Church must change a little, change the speech first, and then not talk about hard and delicate matters, focusing on the "evangelical message", namely tolerance, love of neighbor, care of refugees, combating nationalism, intolerance and anti-Semitism, etc. Neutralization comes from neutralizing the ecclesiastical message, which is inherently opposed to “this world” and “the Lord of this world”.
The thought of neutralisation itself is not new, and in Poland it has been promoted for many decades by the self-determining environment as “laick levice”. The manifesto of this environment and its neutralization plans was the celebrated book by Adam Michnik "Church, Left, Dialogue" (1977), which was repeated and translated into respective languages. The same thought has for many years been pushing the Saturday addition to the “GW”, namely “Noah’s Ark”, which I utilized to read with pastries on my face, carefully highlighting passages of theologically suspicious, not to say openly heretical. However, it has so far been about reinterpretation and silence so that bishops teach Catholic doctrine, which was Catholic only in part, so that behind the language of the same symbols and concepts there would be political and doctrinal pragmatism, where nothing would be white, black, cold, or hot—but all grey and summer. No 1 in Poland straight proposed to verify the Bible or Catechism in terms of political correctness.
The novelism of the thought of retouching Schwab and Harari's Bible is not so much to usage for this AI (it is alternatively a form which is intended to arouse the curiosity of the staremen) as to the thought of neutralizing Christianity to specified an degree as not only to talk or interpret it in accordance with the principles of political correctness, but straight to the thought of retouching a text which Catholics consider inspired by the Holy Spirit, and Jews and Protestants to be straight dictated by God to Moses and another scribes. I read that specified trials had already been made in Argentina, where the Bible was published without anti - judaic themes, specified as the quote “His blood upon us and upon our children” — Mt 27, 25. besides censored Theological sum St. Thomas of Aquinas, where the passages regarded as "anti-Semitic" were removed. However, these were local and alternatively comical trials. Harari and Schwab have a large and serious program, backed by large money and political influence: AI will compose us a fresh Bible. What about the old one? conventional libraries will be closed, the online libraries will throw out the old and rise fresh generations into a new, leaving individual old plays in anti-Semitism museums.
Adam Wielomski
