When asked by Polsat News, why he would not run for Parliament from Warsaw, he replied that his start from another territory “is more effective from the point of view of the interests of the party”. Commenting later on on the words of political competitors that “he is afraid of rivalry with Donald Tuski”, he added: “I knew in advance that the opposition would say so, but what should I be afraid of? The Lord Who Lying, Lie And again Lie?
It's about form. Lie. You should have said Lying, Lies And again Lies. As you can see, infinitive Lie adopts another individual forms in the past tense and others in the present tense. In the first case, there are no difficulties. It's said and written: I lied., I lied., You lied., You lied., Lying, She lied., I lied.; l. mn. We lied., We lied., You lied., You lied., liars, They lied. But in the present time things are different. In the verb core Lie Conjugation IX is replaced Lyme– on Tear– and individual forms are formed: I'm lying. (no: I'm lying.), You're lying. (no: You're lying.), Lies (no: Lie), Lying (no: Lies), You're lying. (no: Liar), Lying (no: They lie.). erstwhile 1 is not aware of this, it is indeed easy to commit specified a linguistic misconduct as happened to Jarosław Kaczyński (Lying, Lie And again Lie).
If my memory is correct (and I think it is correct), then the president of PiS has been utilizing the incorrect form for many years and no 1 in his environment has dared to draw attention to it. That's why I do it. Remember erstwhile and for all, Mr President, there's an infinitive Lie, in the past tense I lied., You lied., You lied., Lying, She lied., We lied., We lied., You lied., You lied., liars, Lies, but in the present time – as I mentioned – I'm lying., You're lying., Lies; Lying, You're lying., Lyingand Lying, Let's lie., Lie. (no: Lie, Lie.), Let him lie., Let them lie. (no: Let him lie., Let them lie.). You besides should be careful about the opposite.
Strong ripost Jarosław Kaczyński ws. @donaldtuskOh, my God! "What am I to be afraid of? The Lord who lied and lied and lied again?"https://t.co/PwP6VGFNFn
— inPoliticy.pl (@wPoliticy.pl) August 26, 2023
To make a verb Lie do not replace with an infinitive form Lie, involuntary as a consequence of the influence of the pattern of variation on it during the present time (impact of individual forms with a particle Tear-). It's spoken and written Lie (no: Lie), e.g. To lie like a slave Is it ‘a lie without hesitation’ or Lie like a note (“to deceive, to lie with large skill, without hesitation, as if it were true.”) any of you may ask why the verb Lie adopts in the present time forms with L-, i.e. why there is simply a voice exchange there g-g. This was due to the fact that from the point of view of the erstwhile grammar, the infinitive core, from which the core was formed forms of the present time, had to be finished with a soft consonant.
So they softened hard g And it went soft au (this was historically soft). However, there have been in the past and specified grammarians who have exceptionally proposed to behave in 2 forms of the present time Lymph-to be closely related to the construction of the infinitive Lie. Then you would say and compose (me) lie, (they) lie. And for a short time form lie, lie were in use. inactive in Grammar of Polish language from 1962 Stanislaw Szober sanctioned the individual character of the verb Lie in the present time in 1st ps. l. poj. and in 3rd ps. l. m.: lie, lie♪ Oh, yeah ♪I'm lying., They're lying. Eventually lie, lie they did not gain approval from another linguists at the time. But I'm lying., You're lying., Lie, Lies, Liar, They lie. They besides did not come to average today.
