Everyone is presently busy with the effects of the election nativity scene as well as the judaic provocation which gave the State of Israel the pretext of a definitive solution to the Palestinian issue through genocide. As a result, fewer people pay attention to Ukraine and the war there.
Meanwhile, there has been a very crucial change. Namely, Ukraine is clearly coming down from the top, and shortly support for it will besides end from the US.
John Kirby said that erstwhile it comes to backing Ukraine, “we are coming to the end of the rope” (an interesting phrase) and that this support will not last forever (recording). Kirby is simply a spokesperson for the National safety Council, and at the same time a retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral, so I don't think he's just saying that without knowing what those words mean.
A typical of the global Monetary Fund in Kiev, on the another hand, said that the Ukrainian authorities should focus on budget revenues – better taxation and customs collection. As he said "the gradual global support for Ukraine will decrease, so Ukraine must make interior co-financing resources". He besides mentioned that social spending would increase at the end of the war – the wording seems to indicate that this end of the war is not distant at all (source).
Similar signals are coming in more and more. European cities now display judaic symbols and colors of Israel's flag, the yellow-blue Ukrainian rag is rolled out. Mrs. Urszula von der Leyen no longer barks at Russia like Scholz or that pathetic Baerbock puppet. As a result, the expanding nervousness of Zelenski's government on the global stage, the effort to keep Ukraine's visibility, which inevitably disappears from the top of the services and disinformation programs replaced by judaic propaganda about the terrible Hamas and the invincible Israeli army.
Beautifully summarizes this image (cover Turkish satirical writing):
Clearly, the reaction to this “expression” was Biden's speechIn which he reiterated that they would proceed to support Ukraine, which is presently being turned on by the main sewer media. There he kept talking nonsense about how erstwhile Ukraine fell bad Putin would attack Poland and so on. However, this does not change the simple fact that the 2 wars of the United States cannot be resolved.
If, therefore, along with these statements on the end of funding, the supply of arms and ammunition is reduced, Ukraine will very rapidly lose any military ability to attack Russia beyond the terrorist actions carried out by single drones for poorly defended civilian targets. The Ukrainian offensive, which has been severely tormented by us in the summer, is no longer spoken, and without permanent supplies of ammunition and weapons from the West, the Ukrainian military will not even be able to defend themselves against the Russian army if it takes offensive action.
Let us now consider what this means in a broader sense. 2 scenarios are possible here.
Option 1: for any reason, Russia has agreed to a kind of frost of war in its current state, so there will be no Russian military attack or forced surrender of the Ukrainian government in negotiations (so there will be no denazification and demilitarisation), there will be a ceasefire on the current lines and what Russia has not taken into the EU – and it will be prepared for another “rundy” fight with Russia. This will besides mean that Putin and his squad are working in collusion with globalists, due to the fact that it will be de facto Russia's political defeat.
Option 2: There is no specified agreement. There will be either the slow spread of Ukrainian defence and the final triumph of Russian troops, or there will be negotiations in which Russia dictates conditions of peace according to its interests. They will surely include the incarnation of circuits which Russia has officially attached as a consequence of referendums, namely the Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, and the Chersonsk and Zaporosk region. It will besides include any form of demilitarisation, i.e. restrictions on the size of armies, possibly any Russian supervision of them, and a ban on EU and NATO accession.
In the second case, this will mean that the Russian leadership was right not to engage in massive offensive operations that were expected by commentators specified as American Colonel McGregor. On the contrary, it will mean that the strategy of waiting was right – Russia will then accomplish the objectives of peculiar Operations without large losses in people and without overburdening its economy (which, let's add, increases). This will besides mean that I was incorrect to fishy Russia to participate in the "simulation" and Putin's government to act in collusion with globalists.
This is erstwhile and in what form a ceasefire or peace will so tell us very much about Russia and about this conflict. However, there is no uncertainty that in the long run it is impossible to defeat Russia in its prefield – Ukraine is the prefield of Russia – if Russia does not direct the disruptors acting on it. The naval power that the United States is does not have the resources to defeat Russia on land, and it is, on a geopolitical scale, just close Moscow. Europe, on the another hand, is completely unfit for any greater war – neither human strength nor material resources. As I have already written, the 3rd Reich had much more strength and resources than what the US and the EU could have against Russia together – and it did not win (although it was close).
Nuclear weapons add an extra dimension here due to the fact that the Russian leadership has left no uncertainty that it will be utilized in the event of a direct attack.
For us, however, much more crucial than these general considerations is What in this situation with Poland. And Poland “thanks” to the policy of the PiS government did everything as stupid and as bad as possible. Unfortunately, this must be added as usual.
As part of the U.S.'s serviceable surrender to our national complexes:
- all economical ties with Russia have been broken – our natural outlet for many classes of goods, and at the same time a origin of coal, gas and oil (which could be at affordable prices if we signed long-term agreements with Gazprom but in the fight against "bad Russia" it has not been decided to do so yet), as a consequence we buy much more costly gas and oil inactive making it successful,
- significantly limited contacts with China, which – to the despair of Chinese specialists – have been taken lightly for a long time (the case of various investments from China, which have been rejected and which have sailed elsewhere to Hungary),
- a fewer million were adopted – it is hard to measure precisely how much – of a abroad Ukrainian component and worse, alternatively of giving it polonization and driving it to work, it is surrounded by benefits, preferences and Ukrainian language pushed everywhere to power (ironically, due to the fact that most of the displaced people from Ukraine do not know this sound and talk Russian),
- The army was disarmed by handing over immense amounts of equipment free of charge – again, it is hard to find precisely how much it was, but these were crucial amounts, partially hidden by expected "purchases" which Ukraine was doing... on credit that they received from Poland,
- Poland was made a deep front base, making the airport under Rzeszów a logistics base through which supplies of war flowed to Ukraine, as well as repairing damaged vehicles, curing injured soldiers, training healthy and so on,
- foreign troops were brought – specifically American and British, whose stay is paid by Poland, and which, if necessary, could turn against the Polish authorities if they tried any unagreed actions,
- credit has been drawn for the acquisition of arms from the US and South Korea, which is not only a debatable value, not only does not give a chance to its own defence industry, but above all it will be delivered in about 2 years, so erstwhile it's over,
- relations with Belarus were worsened first by taking part in an effort to coup and overthrow Lukashenko's power by supporting the “Majdan” organization and then by building a barrier erstwhile the local authorities began to force immigrants on the border as part of the retaliation.
Did I miss anything significant?
All this would possibly make sense if there were a triumphal triumph of Ukraine and as a consequence of the dissolution of the Russian Federation. possibly – due to the fact that then we would face as ungrateful as now but strong Ukraine. However, only a complete idiot could believe in the reality of specified a scenario, so if individual wanted to actually believe in Ukraine's triumph to justify our "decision-makers" would offend their intelligence.
In fact, we did bear the costs and did not get in return Nothing. positive. Moreover, we will proceed to bear the costs, both direct, economical and indirect: political, social. Ukrainians – what is hidden here – are increasing more and more in Poland, and the fresh power will overwhelm them as much as the erstwhile one. alternatively of a program of Polishization, Polish discipline and adaptation to our culture will be the opposite, teaching Ukrainian. alternatively of getting to work, there'll be benefits.
What saves us is that most Ukrainians who fled to Poland are average people who do not want to die for their banner slogans or Zelenski's just to live reasonably calmly. The chance of their assimilation is inactive large – and much greater than in the case of alien racially and culturally invaders whom Western Europe has brought to itself.
However, this chance will most likely be wasted, and it is completely regardless of whether it will proceed to officially manage the Law and Justice or the Law and Justice with adjacentities.
Here comes the thesis of inalternativeness, that Russia has caused us various historical harms and so everything that against Russia is automatically good for Poland. Apart from the nonsense of approaching politics in specified a way as the relation on the playground can be seen, for example, Hungary.
Hungary besides has experience of fighting Russia, including much fresher than us – brutal suppression of the 1956 uprising – and yet they conducted a much better policy throughout the war in Ukraine:
- no borders have been opened and millions of Ukrainians have not been brought in (there are only 53,000 of them there),
- no military equipment has been transferred while maintaining neutrality,
- at all turn threatening to block accession to NATO, the EU, blocking the vote in the EU on another aid to Ukraine, etc. fought for their own interest including the Hungarian number in Ukraine (treated by the government even worse than Poles),
- diplomatic relations with Russia were preserved, the Hungarian abroad Minister Péter Szijártó met with Lavrow many times, always in a good atmosphere (here at 22 boiling),
- no incidents against the Russian ambassador to Hungary were allowed, no actions were carried out to destruct the Red Army war cemeteries (oppositely, they are renewed, hiding soldiers' remains on them with respect e.g. construction work),
- continued purchases of Russian energy carriers and cooperation with ROSATOM – thanks to the skillful usage of the situation of Russia granted Hungary a loan for most of the cost of building another 2 blocks of power plant in Paks. Let us add that this power plant built in 70% already now provides more than 50% of the electricity needed by Hungary.
In fresh days, while visiting Beijing, Orban met with Putin.
I urge you read what they said to each other. (of course, in the authoritative part).
Let us add that gathering with the Chinese is not only a large diplomatic play (it is not possible to accuse Orban of going to Moscow or – even worse – that he invited Putin to Hungary during the course of “no unprovoked aggression”), but besides importantly increases the chances that the US services will not know what was said outside the authoritative part, behind closed doors.
And let us add that Hungary besides cares about relations with Belarus (just They sent an ambassador there.). They besides have large economical relations with China, many Chinese investments went there (including those that the Chinese initially wanted to put in Poland but did not get warm reception).
What will be the consequences of this policy? Well, erstwhile the U.S. withdraws from the region – either as a consequence of weakening or as a consequence of changing Washington's policies as a consequence of interior games “Hungary will proceed to have large relations with Russia, can sale to the Russian marketplace and so on. And no 1 will resent Hungary – neither Russia nor France nor Germany. On both the political side and the economical side, Hungary will so win the position. And if Ukraine breaks apart it is even possible to join Hungary taken from them by the USSR and incorporated into Ukrainian SSR areas inhabited by Hungarians.
Some ambassadors under the dictatorship of the U.S. Ambassador They can make any statements. (I hope the Polish Ambassador was not active in this – it would be a disgrace) but without US Army or Bundeswehr units in place in Hungary can do nothing about it. They are not there due to the fact that the government in Budapest did not search any "Fort Trump" or turn any of its airports into a U.S. logistics base.
As you can see, being a tiny country and despite belonging to NATO and the EU, you can keep your own smart policy. It hurts that unfortunately Poland works precisely the opposite.
