reprint
22.11.2023
What was behind the electoral decisions of any Poles?
Lubach: ‘They escaped from simple logic’
The results of the fresh election revealed any interesting phenomena, the most crucial of which I find the symptom to be astonishing – the desire to eat cookies and have it still. According to the post-election polls, the majority of Poles would like to proceed the activities of the United Right practically in all spheres – political, social, economic, military – and at the same time, as evidenced by the simple deficiency of logic, they removed it from power for those who openly announced the reversal of vectors here by 180 degrees - writes Jerzy „Bayraktar” Lubach in the newest edition of the Polish paper all day.
Independent.PL
This creates a serious problem in planning social and political opposition to the intentions of parties who are calling for power over the state, whose dismantling they are announcing, as the improvement of any strategy must presume a cause-and-effect relation which the ancient thinkers have discovered and defined, but it seems that not only in Poland in a large number of voters is simply a fundamental phenomenon for conscious life.
Escape from Logic
In this situation, accusing the rulings that they did not arrive with their message, and this to the ‘young’, and this to the ‘entrepreneurs’, and this mythical ‘people of the middle’, is pointless, since a large proportion of these groups, in the hope of a cookie, chose an even better click announcing that the cookies will be picked up and consumed by ‘their own’, and alternatively of fresh frikas, there will be voters of a fresh power tightening the belt. I've been writing late that reasoning hurts, but avoiding it hurts getting distant from logic even more.
The feeding on the emotions of a weakly encompassing electorate is not only a Polish specificity, but it has become much easier since for more than a 100 years the foundations of Western culture have been undermined by all self-proclaimed “spirit engineers”, from Bolsheviks and national socialists called for the Nazis, by neo-marksism expressed in anti-human ideologies, or quasi-religions: climateism, genderism, awakenings, cultural expressions, etc. It is the "cancel culture" that best defines their goal rather openly – removing from the consciousness of today's humanity all the baggage of her experiences, with religion, philosophy, tradition at the head.
The effects are: already since the 18th century's alleged Enlightenment, the Christian religion has ceased to influence the choices of most European peoples, and contrary to slander, religion has given a coherent logical system, ordering the lives of societies, which was most beneficial especially in the case of little shrewd members, due to the fact that without having to intensify minds, they lived in a logically arranged world. Since the full pillar building was torn out of this world, it will fall on all of us, but until then, it will be utilized by manipulatives.
Enslaved and self-slaved
And the manipulative can be squeezed in what is convenient – e.g. the pedagogy of shame, erstwhile the arrogant past of the nation is presented as shameful, so why do we request a large good army, or do we request to conquer a number erstwhile oppressed in the debauched noble Republic? president Andrzej Duda stressed in his speech at the National independency Day on 11 November:
"We have lost it by warch, betrayal, foolishness, contaminantness, by so many of our national vices that have caused Poland from 1 of the largest and strongest countries in Europe, this Republic of both Nations, and indeed many nations, to become a fallen country that has been torn apart by neighboring powers"
It is true, but it is besides worth recalling how, after the revival of this independence, our grandfathers managed to cope with the decline of the alien and hostile nation of power, which was besides massively supported by interior collaborators, for whom the national sense did not exist, due to the fact that "polsity is an abnormality." Shortly after taking the helms of the state nave, Józef Piłsudski announced:
"We shall bear the Council in Saski Square from the face of the earth, so that no trace of it remains. How 1 can tolerate a monument that reminds future generations that we bear the yoke of oppression on our shoulders; let all trace of captivity perish in Warsaw, let future generations not see in Warsaw a trace of captivity and the nation's defeat”
And this symbol of the enslavement of Carski – the council – was industriously stripped within 3 years until 1926, and the Palace of Culture and discipline them. Józef Stalin besides stands, stands, stands in the heart of the Polish capital...
“And the walls grow, grow, grow...” – to perceive to the bard, that is, the foreword to our measurement – with guitar, in the spotlight, surrounded by a group of fans. I was at Jack Kaczmarski's concerts, where, as in the case of the large Russian bards – Vertyński, Okudżawa, Wysocki – the magnetism of the performance frequently obscured the main thought. erstwhile you read the lyrics of their songs themselves, you can see the influence of the singer's personality magic on the reception of the listener – this is rather good poetry, but not the highest flight, it was their inspired performance that added its wings. Kaczmarski is simply a different case – he has akin phase magic, sings his own lyrics, but erstwhile you read them separately from the performance, they prove to be large and sophisticated poetry. Who is simply a witch just like Mickiewicz, Słowacki, Norwid or closer to us: Lechon and Wierzyński.
Why do the walls that fell grow?
This question did not concern us with the carnival of Solidarity, not sober skepticism was essential at the time, but a drive for further combat. And it wasn't right, due to the fact that choking that fighting spirit by a puppet theatre circular table showed how terrible it would be for decades as if it were independent and sovereign. Depriving the nation of ambition and large prospects inevitably leads to its discipline, which is convenient for powerful neighbors and collaborators in their name managing specified a provincial state in fact, alternatively than any contrary to the name of the Republic.
In 1919, the Chief of State, Józef Piłsudski, in the course of the fight for the form of the reborn Republic, spoke crucial words that can explain a lot to us here:
"This policy cannot be pursued. What do you mean, we have specified invaluable moments, specified a wonderful chance to do large things in the east, take Russia's place, only with different slogans, and we hesitate? We are afraid to do bold deeds, even against the coalition, while this way we can cope with enemies specified as the russian Republic. We request more religion in our strength and more courage, or we will die and we will not be able to fulfill our task, and we will not be able to separate Poland from our enemies so that it can compose its greatness not through revolutions and terrible experiments of the east, but through evolution.
The heel of bondage is ringing in our souls. Despite the thousands of proofs of how powerful the strength of Polish culture is and how much it has done in fresh years – during which Poland as a state no longer existed – we are afraid to give its tasks besides large now that the strength of culture has been supported by statehood. And so what if our generation is rotten, wicked in the cradle of captivity, before fresh generations come and forget about the conditions of existence better than any of our present cowards seem sufficient.”
And these future generations, the Columbuss of the 20th class, the people of Solidarity, but they were always fiercely fought, persecuted and destroyed by the enemies of the outside and within. I have already quoted the bitter reflection of an anonymous net user:
"I utilized to be incapable to realize how these men led to the partitions of Poland, and now I see these faces on TV, and I already know."
For, as erstwhile in “A bird's eye canine”, Kaczmarski sang with Gintrowski and Lapinski:
“What shame it is for us erstwhile the talars
They have a better course than faith!
We'll trade for currency
Honor and penance...’.
It is painful to remind that the next partitions of the Republic unfortunately approved the sold Polish Sejm. Will we let and now lege artis for another demolition?
--------
Revolution is simply a process, not a state.
It is simply a process of decentralization and deconcentration of power.
It is simply a dynamic process, not a changeless and inflexible state.
DEVOLUTION – the circumstantial transfer of power by the central authority to its regional institutions.
The authorities created by d. thus form an intermediate level between central and local authorities. D. differs from federalism by the fact that, although territorial jurisdiction may be similar, authorities created by d. are not sovereign—their duties and competences come from central authority and are defined by it.
In a national state, there is simply a clear division of competences between the federation and the component parts, linked to the commitment to a lower level of sovereign power within clearly designated areas. In the case of d. there is no transfer or division of sovereign power. D. administrative, which is the most limited form, only means that regional institutions carry out policy programmes prepared and approved elsewhere.
The legislative, sometimes called autonomy, includes the creation of election-based regional assemblies with policy-making powers and fiscal independency elements.
Ms Kaczorowska emphasises that the concept of revolution (devolution) is defined by a circumstantial devolution process in the United Kingdom, consisting in the transfer to a subordinate body of election, carried out on a geographical basis, of functions performed so far by ministers and the United Kingdom Parliament. As a consequence of the evolutionary reform, elected regional typical assemblies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were introduced in the general elections.
D. is simply a trial, not a state. It is simply a process of decentralization and deconcentration of power. It is simply a dynamic process, not a changeless and inflexible state.
The essence of d is that power is transferred in this process, not given up, due to the fact that the sovereign parliament of the United Kingdom does not yet renounce its power.
(as in the EU now? - MS)
David Simpson defines d. as a delegation of central government power without giving up his sovereignty. This allows the right to revoke the powers conferred by the revolution to the regional parliament or assembly at any time. Until now, in Polish the word d. utilized to specify the transfer – at the request of the organization – of competence to resolve a case from 1 administrative body to another, usually overriding [ J.G. Otto ].
Literature:
Literature:
A. Heywood, Politics, Warsaw 2006
J. Szymanek, M. Kaczorowska, A. Rothert, Evolution, Revolution, Emergence in Political Systems, Warsaw 2007
V. Bogdanor, Revolution in the United Kingdom, Oxford 1999.
Revolution – Encyclopedia of Public Administration (uw.edu.pl)
