Plan after losing. Conversation with Prof. ANTONIM DUDKI

"Gazeta Wyborcza" published the text of Dominika Wielowieyska "Sociologists advise PiS". It follows that the author had leaks from the closed gathering of the Head of Law and Justice held with Marek Kuchciński. The gathering was to discuss the problems and challenges facing the party, which experts outlined. The thought of leaks that “Gazeta” has learned about seems grotesque, but it is worth discussing. But let's start with the fact that the Law and Justice have already dealt with the trauma of defeat?

– most likely individual came to the president of Kaczyński with investigation and said that if he kept talking like he did, his party's ratings would fall. And president Kaczyński began utilizing a little aggressive language, but present he again said that the Tusk government is simply a German government. He's trying, but he's not doing it. There are 2 natures in it. 1 says that the message must be subdued, and the other, true, that it should not be inhibited. So they can go to Jarosław Kaczyński, sociologists and PR specialists, and in the end they can say what they think. Therefore, I say the president, as well as his immediate surroundings, did not overcome the trauma of defeat. But an expanding number of activists in his group begin to wonder if the president is on their way. Depending on the size of the failures in the local elections, in the Europarliament and in the presidential elections, the younger generation of activists will either stay with the president or start moving distant from him.

– Even if the president thinks Tusk represents the interests of Germany, it should be said by his scouts: Czarnek, Tarczyński, Terlecki, but not him.

– The problem is, the chief scout is the president himself. The difference between the PiS and the Platform is that in the PO for specified tasks Tusk uses others – erstwhile it was Palikot, then Nitras, but Tusk himself is more balanced.

According to sociologists in PiS, ideology wins. They are empty, due to the fact that the last ideological parties were the League of Polish Families and the Union of Real Politics.

– First you gotta specify what ideology is. If we presume that this is simply a comprehensive task describing reality from fundamental issues, planet views to detailed issues, then of course the Law and Justice Office is not specified a party. There are only passwords and slogans that the CEO juggles, pulls out and hides once, erstwhile again. That's enough, due to the fact that the Polish voter is not very demanding. But Tusk, the platform doesn't even do that. In Poland, ideology is understood as a kind of fanaticism, and that is not true. The PO and the Law and Justice were outbid, but this has nothing to do with ideology. Polish political parties do not even have real programs. They were in the 1990s, but due to the fact that no 1 read them, they were limited to slogans. The coalition agreement in Germany has 300 pages and has been negotiated for a month. In the current government coalition it has 12 or 13 pages, so it is not amazing that it was negotiated for 3 days. This shows the differences in politics.

In the mid-1990s I published a confidential instruction from the Office of State Protection (#UOP) for members of the government and elder civilian servants. It says that bugged wiretaps are most frequently placed in vases. What about the thermos? Kaczyński#PiS#Eavesdroppingpic.twitter.com/5lbIJHO8oP

— Leszek Kraskowski Reporters Online (@LKraskowski) March 17, 2024