The government is considering introducing an indirect PIT rate in 2027, described as 22 or 24 percent, between the current 12 and 32 percent. Problem: in the EU plan, Poland indicated that there were no changes in the PIT scale as a origin of higher gross and deficit reduction. It's a bill for the budget and taxpayers.
Tax Relief vs. Brussels Account
According to the findings of Money.pl and diary of the Legal Gazette, the ruling coalition is considering changing the PIT scale from 2027. The most common is the option of an indirect rate of 22 or 24 percent, which would enter between today's 12% and 32 percent. This is simply a consequence to an expanding number of workers entering the second threshold. It sounds politically attractive. Physically, however, means a teardrop that needs to be shown and covered.
The current arrangement is simple: income up to PLN 120 1000 per year is covered by the rate of 12%, and the surplus above this threshold is at 32 percent. The problem is that the threshold does not keep up with the wages conquered by inflation. In settlement in 2025. over 2.4 million taxpayers paid PIT at a rate of 32 percent., which meant little than 10% clearing. The state first utilized a silent taxation increase through the frozen threshold, and present is looking to sale voters a partial reversal of their own profit.
The cheapest promise alternatively of the free amount
The largest promise of the civilian Coalition, or 60 1000 PLN of the free amount, remains out of reach. Bankier.pl, describing the answers of the finance department, indicated that the hypothetical cost of specified a change in 2027 was PLN 58.6 billion. This is the amount at which press conferences end, and the hard budget begins.
That's why the cheaper version was on the table. Money.pl stated that a variant with an intermediate threshold of 24 percent between 120 and 150 1000 PLN would give a maximum of 2400 PLN per year benefits, or 200 PLN per month, at an estimated cost of 3-4 billion PLN. This is simply a real relief for any employees. But it's besides a political patch for the wound that you've made, allowing inflation and deficiency of value for the threshold to push people to a higher tribute.
At this point it is worth going back to an earlier DN analysis, due to the fact that PIT 24 percent has a second bottom: the government does not want to give all the surplus taken from taxpayers by frozen thresholds, only part. The citizen is to be relieved, and the budget is to hold as much of the gross as possible. This is the fiscal compromise of a country that has increased spending and is afraid to tell people the fact about their price.
Poland has promised the EU no changes in scale
However, the most serious problem is not in PIT arithmetic itself. It lies in papers sent to Brussels. In the April study on the implementation of the medium-term budgetary and structural plan, the Ministry of Finance indicated that the general government deficit in 2026 was to fall by 0.5 percent points and scope 6.8 percent of GDP. The hotel besides wrote that higher gross from direct taxes will aid in reducing effect of no change in the taxation scale parameters in PIT.
This conviction is politically uncomfortable. The government in Warsaw can talk about a mediate class relief, but in EU papers it shows that the deficiency of changes in the PIT helps to close the deficit path. Prof. Andrzej Torój, Vice-President of the Fiscal Council, told Money.pl that the Ministry of Finance will gotta show the European Commission how balanced the expected budget deficits will be. erstwhile translating into the taxpayer's language: if you take little somewhere, you gotta take more or cut your expenses elsewhere.
Sovereignty starts with its own budget
Poland fell into the excessive deficit procedure and adopted a plan to go below 3% of GDP in 2028. The Ministry of Finance praised that the European Commission has positively assessed the Polish expenditure way and the plan itself reduction of the nominal deficit below 3% of GDP in 2028 and gradual debt reduction. This is not an abstraction from the table. This is simply a framework in which the Polish government itself gave part of the freedom of budget policy for the assessment of Brussels.
Nationally liable taxation policy should act differently. First, you tell citizens how much their promises cost. Then cuts unnecessary expenses, simplifies the system, leaves more money to families and jobs. Meanwhile, the current power is attempting to pretend fiscal discipline before the EU and generosity before voters. That's no way to build economical sovereignty. That's how you build dependence on individual else's approval.
Brussels should not decide what the Polish taxation scale should be. But if the government itself writes no changes to the PIT as part of the financial recovery plan and then announces relief without indicating coverage, then the problem created itself in Warsaw. Poles are entitled to lower, simpler taxes. They besides have the right to know who will pay for all promise made erstwhile at Novgorodka, erstwhile at agrarian and erstwhile at the offices of the European Commission.
This dispute has a circumstantial stake: the portfolios of working families, the credibility of the state and the freedom to conduct its own policies. Brussels fiscal ideas besides return at excise dutyBut here work is primarily national. If Poland wants to be a serious state, it must halt conducting taxation policy like an advertising campaign.
Source: Money.pl, Bankier.pl, diary of the Legal Gazette, Ministry of Finance.
Source: Money.
