The PiS announces a announcement to Tusk. Zondacrypto deposition dispute

dzienniknarodowy.pl 6 days ago
Zdjęcie: PiS zapowiada zawiadomienie na Tuska. Spór o zeznania Zondacrypto


Euro MP PiS Jacek Ozdoba announced on 7 September the submission of the same announcement to the prosecutor regarding Donald Tusk. He accuses the Prime Minister of unlawful disclosure from the Parliamentary talker of passages of evidence in the Zondacrypto case. This is an opposition policy position for now, not a prosecution's ruling or a court.

Announcement of a announcement following a speech in the Sejm

Jacek Ozdoba informed in the program "Tlit" of Virtual Poland that the Law and Justice politicians intend to notify the prosecution of Donald Tusk's anticipation of committing a crime. The question of erstwhile this was to happen, he replied, "Today will be." He did not give the full text of the letter or detailed legal qualifications in the discussion.

The dispute broke out after the Prime Minister's speech in the Sejm. Tusk read excerpts from the evidence of Przemysław Kral related to the Zondacrypto case. According to this account, Zbigniew Ziobro, through others, promised Kral a favourable conclusion to the company case. This claim is based on the evidence and requires the assessment of the investigating authorities. It is not a final determination of the erstwhile minister's guilt.

The decoration powerfully rejected this version. He besides accused the Prime Minister that he had no right to disclose material from the proceedings. According to the Euro MP, the anticipation of providing specified information to the media is available to the lawyer General or designated prosecutors, not to the head of the government. This argument will should be checked by the D.A. if the announcement actually does.

Communication is not evidence of guilt

In the state of law, simply making a notification does not prejudge the crime. The Prosecutor's Office first assesses whether there are grounds for initiating proceedings and then examines the evidence. Similarly, the evidence of the witness or fishy is not yet evidence of the individual concerned.

This simple rule dies in a political bang today. The Prime Minister utilized the parliament's platform to present a passage of the procedural material hitting an crucial opposition figure. The PiS corresponds to a announcement directed at the Prime Minister. Citizens get another installment of the war on accusations, although they inactive do not know the full context of the documents.

Zbigniew Ziobro had previously requested the full files concerning Zondacrypto. This request is political, but it indicates a real problem: selective citation of materials can build a image of the case before the court verifies the evidence and before the persons indicated in the evidence can address them comprehensively.

Government cannot replace court

Donald Tusk has the right to talk on public matters and be liable for government policy. However, he should not usage authority of the office to propose decisions that law enforcement and courts have not yet issued. The more serious the charges, the greater the discipline of words should be.

The same request applies to the opposition. Decoration may question the legal basis of the Prime Minister's action and direct the case to the prosecutor's office. However, it cannot present its own assessment as a final judgment. Whether Tusk has passed the law, the competent authorities will decide, not the tv studio.

In the background is the case of cryptocurrency exchange itself and questions about its contacts with political people. An earlier comment from the National diary indicated that incriminating questions about Ziobra do not give the coalition the right to triumph. It is in the interest of the State to clarify these relations, regardless of the organization colours of the persons concerned.

Institutions' credibility is at stake

For Poles, the most crucial thing is not who wins 1 day of media clash. Trust in the prosecutor's office, the Sejm and the Prime Minister's office are at stake. If the papers of proceedings are disclosed in accordance with the law, the public should know the basis for specified a decision. If the limits have been exceeded, the work must be fixed in the average mode, without a concession tariff for power.

The state can't act like any party's run staff. The files are designed to come to the truth, not to produce political headlines. Therefore, the announcement of the Law and Justice should be rapidly and transparently assessed and all persons mentioned in the case must benefit from the presumption of innocence. It's the only way to separate power control from propaganda warfare.

Source: Virtual Poland

Source: WP News

Read Entire Article