Confederate press conference on the referendum with Members Krzysztof Bosak and Stanisław Tyszko.
Krzysztof Bosak:
– We present questions we want to ask Poles. We believe that referendums are a good instrument to aid specify what government policy should be. Questions must be serious, substantive, they must be about what the government is truly doing.
– Our questions have been promoted in the media for days. In our first consequence to the questions on the European Union's migration policy, we have presented not 1 but 5 questions on migration policy. At the moment, in consequence to the enlargement of the referendum, apart from migration policy, we are adding further questions.
– Do you support the payment of social benefits to immigrants?
It's something the government does. According to a survey of 4/5, the public does not support this. The government of Mateusz Morawiecki did not ask anyone for an opinion. All abroad laws add up.
– Do you support the valorisation of the 500+ benefitTo 800+?
That's a real question. Do Poles want that? Let us remind that PiS politicians themselves at first said that the extension of 500+ to 700+ would be pro-inflationary, but later, erstwhile they came up with the thought of introducing 800+, it abruptly magically turned out that if 700+ was pro-inflationary, 800+ was no longer.
– Do you support limiting the usage of cash.
Recall that the government of Matthew Morawiecki, a government made up of hypocrites who conducted a non-transparent policy, added various provisions to the pandemic laws, including provisions limiting the anticipation of utilizing cash. A horse with a row of who will explain what connection to the pandemic, covid, and limiting the anticipation of utilizing cash.
You can see that the people who went out of banking, never those bankers, never cease to be banks. Morawiecki quietly, behind the scenes tried to limit the free usage of his rights to Poles. This is in line with the agenda of large financial institutions. ...
– Do you support the ban on registration of fuel cars since 2035?
– This is 1 of the many issues on which the Law and Justice Office, first in the European Union, agreed, and then tries to give the public the impression that it is simply a organization against it. A real cabaret. The same as in the Fit For 55 case, where they first agreed, and then they post billboards in Poland, that they disagree very much.
Stanisław Tyszka:
"The Confederacy has deep respect for the institutions of the referendum. due to the fact that he has respect for the citizens, for the sovereign, for their right to talk on fundamental matters for our functioning as a state, as a nation.
The law and justice, unfortunately, compromises, ridicules the institution of the referendum, as in fresh years it has embarrassed the another institutions of our state and our state as a whole.
The foundation of what they are doing right now is simply a deficiency of respect for citizens, including a deficiency of respect for their own voters.
"The Confederation shows voters, including voters of Law and Justice, that people can be treated seriously and asked questions that are of real importance to our lives. ...
The questions we presented are questions about the pockets of Poles and the issues of safety and freedom of Poles.
Stanisław Tyszka besides pointed out that the referendum could service the Law and Justice for another purpose:
– Law and Justice treat this referendum in an instrumental way. We presume that besides to usage this to blur the boundaries between the parliamentary run and the referendum campaign, financially. The rules for backing the referendum run presume that they can be run by foundations and associations. We know that since 2 word Law and Justice brings money from various ministries to friendly associations and foundations.
We request to watch very carefully how this run will be conducted now, due to the fact that we know that the Law and Justice have no brakes erstwhile it comes to throwing them in the mud or privatizing public money or stubbornly.
