"PiS and Braun made a political deal? Secrets of Zawiślak's transfer to the Confederation of the Polish Crown”

On Wednesday, the Polish Crown Confederation (KKP) was officially established in the Sejm. Sławomir Zawislak, erstwhile MP of Law and Justice, who joined Braun's formation, played a key function in this event. Media speculates that the full transfer could have been planned by the PiS management.

How did the KKP wheel come into being?

Grzegorz Braun had already announced that 1 more MP was needed to make the wheel. – Members of Włodzimierz Skalik and Roman Fritz, vice presidents of my party, the Confederation of the Polish Crown, to inform the talker of the Sejm that a ellipse is being formed, they request at least 1 more MP," said the MEP.

In the end, Sławomir Zawislak, who left the PiS ranks and joined KKP, turned out to be the missing link. According to Virtual PolandThis transfer took place with the cognition and approval of the Law and Justice authorities.

"Simple Deal" of PiS with Braun?

According to the portal information, the full situation could have been part of a political agreement between PiS and Grzegorz Braun. 1 associate stated that Zawislak had long had views closer to the Confederacy. “This is just what he thinks,” said an anonymous parliamentarian.

Two versions of what happened behind Zawiślak's transfer appear in the media:

1. In exchange for Braun's support for Karol Nawrocki – the MP publically supported the PiS candidate in the second circular of the presidential election.
2. As a thank you for this support – or PiS “give back” the MP as a thank you for helping with the campaign.

Who is Sławomir Zawiślak?

Zawiślak is not a novice in political controversy. In 2020, he was suspended in the rights of a associate of the PiS for opposing the alleged "A" for animals. At that time, he lost his position as organization field lawyer in Zamość. Nevertheless, in 2023 he was again on the PiS electoral list and won a parliamentary mandate.

Is this the beginning of the cooperation between the Law and the Confederacy?

Although both formations frequently present akin views, so far they have avoided authoritative alliances. The transfer of Zawislak and the possible agreement to support Nawrocki may indicate a change to this strategy. Is this a sign of closer cooperation in the future?

Analysis of Grzegorz Braun's political return: Does supporting Nawrock mean giving up the perfect foundations?

Historical context: Braun as a critic of the PiS pandemic policy

Grzegorz Braun, throughout the period of the regulation of the United Right, has consistently acted against the pandemic solutions which he then introduced, which he referred to as a "sanitary dictatorship". His opposition focused in peculiar on:

• obligation to wear masks in public space
• attempts to introduce coercion with vaccines during the clinical trial phase
• limiting civilian rights under the pretext of fighting the alleged pandemic

Repressions against Braun during the PiS rule

• Unlawful decommitment: Braun was repeatedly punished by the talker of the Sejm Elizabeth Witek for not wearing a mask in the plenary, although its action did not violate the legal order.
• Locking the voice of the Member: During speeches “He's got a bad mouth.“and his interventions were deliberately hampered.
• PIS political militia: While performing parliamentary duties in offices He was sent to serveto prevent it from working.

The paradox of the current situation: from criticism to an informal ally

The support given by Braun to Karol Nawrock, a candidate closely associated with the political formation liable for the above-mentioned repression, raises serious doubts as to:

• Ideical Cohesion – how to reconcile the rhetoric to the present position?
• Political credibility – on what basis would voters proceed to trust Member’s declarations?
• Long-term strategies – is this a temporary tactical alliance or a permanent change of course?

Political Perspective: hazard of Instrumental Treatment

The past of the Polish political scene knows many cases of marginalization of smaller groups by larger entities. Experience:

• Self-defense by Andrzej Lepper
• Agreements between Jarosław Gowin
• parts of the Kukiz’15 environment

point to a repetitive pattern of cooperation ending with the marginalisation of a smaller partner.

Conclusions and perspectives

1. Image dilemma – Braun risked losing the protest electorate, which provided his basic facilities
2. Political responsibility – is it possible to reconcile existing values with current actions?
3. Future scenarios:
   • Temporary Tactical Alliance
   • Gradual absorption by larger formation
   • attempting to keep autonomy with limited influence

Final evaluation Braun's current moves will require an analysis of both their political implications and their actual effects on the accomplishment of the declared programme objectives.