What will be Poland's global position in 2030? All points to the fact that if the current rhythm of governance is maintained in a somewhat changed political configuration: first by the “right” of post-solidarity, the core of which is the Law and then by liberals from the erstwhile post-communist formations and the Union of Freedom, then the form of our abroad policy will be determined by the progressive “democratic” front, which just took power in the past year.
Today's Polish multi-colored coalition – which will possibly be strengthened in 2 years by 1 of its leaders – will prosecute the alleged Sustainable improvement Goals (SDG – sustained improvement goals) formulated by globalistic constructors of the “new wonderful world” which subsequent Polish governments accepted practically without blinking their eyes.
Although under beautiful slogans there are revolutionary changes that bring to our country the hazard of monstrous social and civic changes that de facto change the face of civilization of Poland, these goals were accepted and obediently implemented by the government of the alleged united right (which remained in constant dispute with Brussels). Well, only erstwhile they are dealt with by the open enthusiasts of revolutionary changes – they will make the policy of alleged sex equality (target SDG No. 5) turn into a real fight that destroys conventional culture and customs, and climate policy (target SDG No. 13) will lead to the expropriation and universal impoverishment of Poles.
A man from Berlin.
If it was possible to accuse Prime Minister Morawiecki's government of implementing a globalist policy (although in the times of the alleged COVID-19 pandemic) or succumbing to various pressures from EU institutions, it is expected that the fresh authorities will be much more available to abroad centres of power. First of all, Berlin – Donald Tusk himself, supported from the beginning of his career by “partners” from the Spree and the Rhine, both in the days of his erstwhile governments and in the office of president of the European Council, has repeatedly demonstrated complete dependence on German politics. And the another politicians of the ruling coalition are Euroenthusians associated with the EU bureaucracy with both interests and ideology, who have demonstrated against the expected moving Poland out of the Union by the Law and Justice Government, which was expected to be a rachistic opposition to the dictatorship of the EU institutions in matters of "lawfulness".
The litmus paper of submission to Eurocrats will be the question of illegal immigration from muslim countries and the alleged relocation of migrants. On the 1 hand, the communities of the fresh coalition have already tried to sabotage the defence of the Polish east border against the invasion of the refugees, on the another hand, in view of the widespread designation by Poles of this phenomenon as an component of the hybrid war led by Russia with Poland as the forpost of the West, the run had to distance themselves from it.
However, this is of small importance, as the politics of the gramcist rulers of the revolution present in Europe, ’68, is consistent and aims to mix the Old Continent peoples with a mass of incoming peoples, thus making a fresh European demos A fresh identity. Thus, it is expected that even if the government formally demonstrates the fight against illegal immigration, the influx of abroad nations will increase annually in geometric progress. Already present there are about 4 million of them in Poland. If at the same time the number of citizens of our country is falling by an average of 150 000 all year, as indicated by current demographic trends, immigrants can already make a large, multi-percented number in Poland by 2030.
Donald Tusk's government and its availability towards Berlin and Brussels are besides an crucial component of the puzzle that allows for a further transformation of the European Union – a leap to which EU federalists (actually should be called eurototalists) have been preparing for a long time. Let us callback the acceleration that has taken place at the end of last year on the draft Treaty amendments yet adopted by the European Parliament, which will yet destruct the remaining independency of national states left inactive by the Treaty of Lisbon in the form of the alleged right of veto and reservations of part of the competence exclusively for the countries that form the Union.
Not only migration, agriculture, the economy and global affairs, but besides health, energy, climate, industrial and educational policies will depend on the position of Eurocrats in the fresh EU. To date, equality policy is to be deepened, equality between men and women to be replaced by gender equality, and the associate States will be forced to adopt all standards of "rules of law" and "democracy" produced in Brussels. The full image of the fresh state de facto the EU will be completed by a "defensive union" with the armed forces of national states (even without the approval of their authorities).
A teaching past of the Euroconstitution
All right, individual will ask – but the adoption of specified solutions in the European Parliament's proposal does not yet make them effective. On the way, there are tedious negotiations between countries where many provisions may be amended or deleted. In this regard, the past of the Treaty establishing the European Constitution, which demonstrates the desire of the Euro-bureaucracy to transform the European Union into a single, centralised country whose institutions will take over the full powers of the national authorities, and its administrative units (of much greater importance than the erstwhile countries) will become regions.
Even in the 1980s and 1990s, most European politicians maintained that the intent of the existence of the European Communities was primarily economical integration, as at the time of their creation. However, as early as 1999, Italian politician Romano Prodi, taking the presidency of the European Commission, said openly that The current form of the national state is no longer validand the national European state is goal in itself. Introduction to this was already made in December 2000 in good by establishing the provisions of a fresh treaty, which restricts, inter alia, the right of veto, a fundamental instrument to guarantee that each associate State guarantees the defence of its own interests within the Union.
Shortly thereafter, the Convention, with erstwhile French president Valery Giscard d’Estaign at the head, prepared a draft treaty establishing the Constitution of Europe. It provided for the national construction of the Union, the creation of European citizenship, the subordination of the Union of associate States' local governments and the establishment of the advanced typical for the Common abroad and safety Policy. The task has secreted to the exclusive competence of the Union, inter alia, monetary policy, reducing the decision-making capacity of state authorities in the fields of economic, abroad and safety policy to almost zero and reducing it importantly in environmental, social policy, consumer protection, health, agriculture, fisheries and transport matters.
Moreover, the draft of the Euroconstitution in the preamble did not include a mention to Christianity, which formed a community of European nations, but the representatives of the Masonry present in the Convention made certain that there was a mention to the... legacy of the French Revolution.
The first effort to adopt the Euroconstitution at the summit in Brussels in 2003 burned down the opposition of Poland and Spain, but shortly in the second country, following the terrorist attack in Madrid, the right-wing government was replaced by socialists who withdrew Spanish opposition. At the next summit, the lonely Poland was no longer a problem and the treaty was adopted.
Despite the immediate launch of the media device and the engagement of the ruling elites of almost all associate States in task propaganda, it has not been possible to implement it. The early ratification by the European Parliament and the parliaments of any countries did not aid – the French (54.87 percent of the votes against) and the Dutch (61.6 percent against) rejected the Euroconstitution in referendums.
However, the Euro-bureaucrats did not lay down their arms – they decided to introduce the main provisions of the Euro-Constitution by embodying them in the treaties creating the Union by means of another treaty, which was yet signed in Lisbon on 13 December (and indeed!) 2007. Only the most conspicuous symbols of the fresh superstate, specified as the anthem, the flag, the very word "constitution" or the names of legal acts (the Act) were abandoned. However, most importantly, what changed the essence of the Union itself, namely: extending its competences and eliminating self-limiting mechanisms, introducing the institutions of the president of the European Council and the advanced typical (actually Minister) for abroad Affairs and safety Policy, yet the Charter of Fundamental Rights – a set of liberal values on which the functioning of the EU is to be based.
This time, a broad democratic legitimacy for change was no longer sought – the ratification process was to take place through parliamentary decisions and signatures of Heads of State. The only problem in the way of Eurocrats was Ireland, whose constitution required the adoption of all specified treaties by referendum. The first approach resulted in the defeat of the supporters of Lisbon – the treaty was rejected by 53 percent of the Irish voters. But the determination of the creators of the superstate was immense – a parody of ratification was made, forcing the Irish to vote again. Another referendum held in October 2009 and preceded by a massive propaganda run combined with various forms of blackmail of the Green Island residents brought the desired effect – the majority voted as Brussels bureaucracy expected.
Place of Poland in the national Arrangement
In subsequent years, the process of building a superstate has been somewhat slowed down by, among another things, brexit, but it is about to be accelerated, in which Poland, governed by the erstwhile president of the European Council, is to play a crucial role. While Eurosceptics have spoken in any Western European countries, Eurosceptics have hoped that if the fresh package of changes that yet form the EU superstate are supported by the largest countries (Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland) and those traditionally satellites, the opposition of the others will besides be overcome by the methods already utilized in the case of the Euroconstitution: pressure, propaganda and rude bribery.
There is no uncertainty that the introduction of these changes will origin Poles to lose their leftover decision-making in matters concerning their own country, including defence policy. And this will happen erstwhile the largest armed conflict on our continent has continued on the east runs of Europe since the Second planet War.
The failure of Ukraine – very likely against Russia's inactive tremendous military force and weakening support provided by the West to a state which defends itself against invasion – can have various disastrous consequences for the Republic, from the influx of a immense mass of refugees to the transfer of combat actions to our territory. The question is, will Berlin and Brussels show a determination to defend threatened Poland, or will they search to alleviate our conflict with Russia and safe their own interests?
After all, this is only 1 script that can be realised in the coming years, which, as the escalation of economic, social and military conflicts around the planet indicates, can prove to be a time of exceptional confusion, if not a large war. Will the challenges that will surely arise at specified a time be met by the husband of a well-known judaic journalist, who abuses... social media, who is at the head of the Polish diplomacy?
Peter Doerre
The text was published in the bimonthly "Polonia Christiana", January – February 2024 (number 96)
