Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz reported that on Monday 7 September for 3.5 hours she was interrogated in the Regional Prosecutor's Office on the return of PLN 770 VAT from more than a decade ago erstwhile she headed the Polish embassy in Moscow. Polish leader 2050 suggests political background; the prosecution has not yet publically provided its own explanation.
Hearing after more than 10 years
The leader of Poland 2050 provided information about the proceeding in her own social media entry. How They study WP NewsThe politician spent 3.5 hours in the Regional Prosecutor's Office. The procedure is to cover the reimbursement of PLN 770 VAT from the period during which she served as Polish Ambassador to Russia.
Pełczyńska-Nałęcz described the phrase as alleged and pointed out that the case dates back more than 10 years. In an ironic comment, she assured that no 1 was trying to intimidate her and that the substance surely had no political character. It's her assessment, not her trial. At this stage, there is no published D.A. position that explains the position of the policy, the basis for the proceeding and the reason for returning to the event after specified a long time.
Political proposition requires a prosecutor's answer
The amount of 770 PLN combined with a 3.5-hour proceeding must rise questions about proportions. However, the amount alone does not find the merits of the action. The EPPO shall have the right and work to analyse possible infringements of the law irrespective of the party's legitimacy of the individual concerned. A politician can besides not be released from explanations due to the fact that he has a advanced capacity.
The problem begins erstwhile the state institution does not communicate clearly what it is investigating and why it is returning to the substance after years. The proposition of political pressure, voiced by the party's head, strikes assurance in justice. So she should meet with a factual answer, not silence. In the state of law, the prosecution must not be utilized to discipline opponents, but must not retreat from activities under force from political charges.
The case comes at a hard time for the group. A fewer days earlier Pełczyńska-Nałęcz commented on tensions around Szymon Holowniaand the discussion on the future of Poland 2050 has been going on for months. However, the political calendar itself is not evidence of the instrumental action of investigators.
Public rules defend the citizen and the state
The stake exceeds 770 PLN and 1 organization leader. Poles have the right to know that the law enforcement apparatus operates according to clear rules, regardless of the name and arrangement of forces in the government. Without specified certainty, any action against politics will be presented as repression and any withdrawal from it as a privilege of power.
Now concrete details are needed: the nature of the proceedings, the procedural function of Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and the reason for taking up the case after more than a decade. Until they are presented, neither guilt nor political vengeance must be established. A country that wants to be taken seriously must be able to explain its own actions.
Source: WP News
Source: WP News
