The elections in east Germany show that the parliamentary strategy in Europe is beginning to crumble. In order to preserve the face and not admit the fundamental errors of the chapedic politicians are able to enter into coalition even with the communists. There is only 1 thing that matters: the idol of liberal democracy, although in fact it has not been much in common with democracy for a long time.
In Thuringia she won an alternate for Germany, in Saxony she finished second with a large score of 30.6%, only somewhat evading the CDU (31.9%). In both lands, stable, right-wing governments could easy be created if the CDU had formed a coalition with the AfD: in Saxony a typical of the Chadetia, in Thuringia – Alternatives, would be Prime Minister. The policy of specified a government would undoubtedly correspond to the will of voters, and it would most likely besides be rather effective due to the fact that it is based on rational reasons. But in no case will it. The reason is simple: the CDU excludes any cooperation with AfD, so it will assemble broad coalitions with another partners. Effect: In both lands governments will be formed with the participation of the chadeks, social democrats and neo-communist BSW group, or possibly the post-communist left.
CDU politicians – officially acting for ideas specified as the free market, patriotism, right to life, conventional education, good relations with the Church – will cooperate with supporters of social murderism, reparation, legal prenatal infanticide, transgender experiments in school and anti-clericalism. Isn't that crazy? Well, yeah, that's crazy. Governments in Thuringia and Saxony will be completely exotic and will prevent any sensible policy. However, German media and political elites say unanimously that this is much better than cooperating with AfD due to the fact that AfD is "imdemocratic". The fact that this organization has received more than 30% of the support in both states is commonly referred to as a "damaged" democracy.
W Germany is experiencing a phenomenon akin to what we have late encountered in Poland. The selection of millions of Poles for Law and Justice in 2015 and 2019 was declared "undemocratic" and was only barely tolerated by leftist and "central" environments. In 2023, the PiS won again and from a programming position the most reasonable coalition would be the PiS-PSL-Confederation coalition. However, the idiotic coalition of the left, centre-left and centre-right parties became active in dispelling the Law and Justice. The politician led by Donald Tusk's government does not respond to the will of voters, due to the fact that most Poles do not want, for example, a revolution in the education system, a fight against religion or legal killing of children on receipt from a psychiatrist. However, the will of voters and the interests of the state play no role. The ruling leftist-liberal elites are closed in their own world: democracy is only erstwhile they regulation alone and do what Brussels likes.
Germany and Poland are no exception. In a fewer weeks, we will be observing precisely the same thing in Austria. The polls indicate that the right-wing FPÖ party, the very close AfD, and the reasonably close Confederacy/right-wing Law enforcement will win there. However, it will not regulation due to the fact that another groups will form a broad front against it, preferring to let abortionists and communists vote.
The results of the elections and the reactions to them show clearly that we are facing a deep crisis of liberal democracy. In all the countries dominated by left-wing elites, a terrible policy has been pursued for decades. This applies to many spheres, for simplicity only 1 problem. Due to the widespread promotion of antinatalism and legalization of abortion and contraception in all countries of this system, so fewer children are born that societies are rapidly shrinking. Left-wing elites are incapable to change politics: they are barred from this adopted ideology. Therefore, they treat this deadly demographic illness with mass migration. Which, of course, causes tremendous financial burdens and dramatically increases crime. Left-wing elites, however, are incapable to solve this and this problem, due to the fact that it again forbids them of this ideology. To deal with demography, they would gotta reject sexual libertarianism. To deal with migration, he would gotta take a national perspective, ending with universal talk about a planet without borders. They can't do that, so it gets worse all year.
As a result, there is an apparent response: the people of the countries affected by the crisis effort to usage democratic tools and vote in elections for those groups that effort to break up with liberal dogmas 1 way or another. People realize or feel that there is no another way, that means that illness is so serious that political change is simply a necessity. However, it turns out that the democratic and liberal strategy is immune to specified a treatment: victorious right-wing groups are incapable to enter the government, and the very fact that they be is considered a disaster of democracy. As a result, coalitions are formed, in which the only more or little rational component (in Germany it will be partially CDU, in Austria ÖVP, in Poland PSL) is marginalized or simply bound by the requirements of compromise with another coalitions. This means that the policy pursued by these coalitions will by definition be bad and will only aggravate existing problems.
This could be predicted to affect 2 processes. On the 1 hand, support for right-wing formations specified as AfD, FPÖ or the long-term right wing of PiS/Confederation will proceed to grow. However, with consistent isolation policies, these groups will not be able to gain real power, especially in Western Europe. This will lead to problems caused by protracted leftist-liberal governments, that erstwhile the wall is yet pierced, the repair of the situation by consensus and with full respect for the average democratic tools – by nature rather weak and slow – will simply be impossible. Real treatment will simply require extraordinary measures, i.e. suspension of the pre-existing liberal-democratic order, in order to let the political entity chosen by the nation to execute precise and essential actions.
Question: If this operation is successful, would it be rational to return to the old system, or would it be wise to proceed to conduct policies based on completely fresh rules, at most with any pre-existing appearances?
And what will voters decide – to grant them themselves full democratic rights, or alternatively to stabilise the political course without full rights?
Later on, the past of the Roman republic shows that, after the era of chaos, no non-Republic power can be perceived both as salvation and, in practice, indeed as such. In the loud book “On the Way to the Empire”, David Engels put the thesis that the European Union would repeat the Roman strategy and replace the republic with the sole power, in 1 or another formula. There are many indications that this will happen: the situation is increasing to this point.
In this way, the worst fears of "most democratic-liberal" will indeed be fulfilled, due to the fact that groups specified as AfD and FPÖ may be gravers of liberal democracy. Only that this comparison must be taken literally: they are liberal democracy only they will be buried due to the fact that the “democrats” themselves had previously murdered her.
Paweł Chmielewski
