The Sejm Infrastructure Committee advocated rejecting the civilian draft law, requiring the government to implement the CPK in the version of the first multiannual programme of the CPK. Known for her fight for the Central Communication Port, MP Paulina Matysiak published a “list of shame” on which politicians voted to reject the project.
On this issue, in particular, it is outraged that the coalition politicians decided on 13 December to throw in the basket a widely supported civic task under which more than 193 000 people signed. The collection of signatures was led by the Association #TakdlaCPK. specified an awesome number of signatures were collected in just 3 months.
Objectives
The task obliges the government, the typical of the government for the Central Communication Port, the government administration and the CPK's peculiar intent company to implement the Central Communication Port programme in the form and timetable contained in the Resolution of the Council of Ministers of 24 October 2023 on the establishment of a multi-annual programme, the “Central Communication Port Investment Programme”. phase II. 2024-2030’.
The task proposes to prohibit the government from making changes in the programme, consisting in changing its intent and scope, resulting in the hold in the launch of the airport and the completion of the construction of the Warsaw-Lodz railway line beyond 2030. According to the proposal, the government could besides not reduce the backing of the bond scheme.
The task besides requires entities another than the government active in the task to refrain "from any legal or factual action that could straight or indirectly affect the implementation of the Programme (CPK-PAP) within the time limits and on the terms specified therein".
The task besides includes a commitment to transfer all civilian air traffic from Chopin Airport to CPK Airport until 30 June 2031. At Chopin Airport, only investments would be allowed, which will return by the end of 2030.
Project rejection
MP Paulina Matysiak in the social media revealed that it was Marek Owl from the Civic Platform that requested the rejection of the civilian draft law on the work of public authorities to carry out the investment of the Central Communication Port.
Committee on Infrastructure, today's vote to reject the bill on the work of public authorities to carry out investments in the Central Communication Port. Who was for rejection? List of disgraces below:
Members of the KO:
Krzysztof Habura Dominik Jaskowiak Piotr Kandyba Małgorzata Kołodziejczak Stanisław Lamczyk Jolanta Niezgodka Karolina Pawliczak Marek Pietrzczyk Mariusz Popielarz Krystyna Sibińska Marek Sowa Franciszek Sterczewski Krzysztof Truskolaski Bartosz Zawija
Members of Poland 2050:
Rafał Kasprzyk Barbara Oliwacka Mirosław Suchon Kamil Wnuk
PSL MPs:
Marek Sawicki Henryk Smolarz
“ She wrote.
CPK is simply a company of the State Treasury appointed to prepare and implement the Multiannual Programme of the Central Communication Port, which includes the construction of a fresh central airport for Poland and the coordination and implementation of accompanying investments, including a fresh network of railway lines, expressways, motorways and another transmission infrastructure. Ownership supervision is exercised by the Government Plenipotentiary for Central Communication Port.
As part of the CPK programme, the central airport, located between Warsaw and Łódź, is to be established, as well as the strategy of advanced velocity Railways. The fresh airport is initially intended to operate 34 million passengers per year and designed in specified a way that it can be flexibly expanded in the long term, in line with marketplace needs and forecasts. The estimated investment cost by 2032 is PLN 131.7 billion.
Limited CPK
At present, the government's inept approach to CPK is very limited in relation to the first assumptions. These restrictions have been introduced under the slogan of "realisation" and the planned railway lines have been severely reduced.
It is hard not to get the impression that politicians of the current ruling formations support the CPK only due to the upcoming presidential elections. It is worth mentioning that until late they had fought hard against this project. From their mouths were absurd accusations that the task served Russia.
However, the fresh location decision was repeatedly postponed due to a deficiency of documentation.
SEE ALSO:
as/PAP/X/inPolitics.pl
