Since 1988, erstwhile Dr. Vernon Coleman first revealed that fear of AIDS is an exaggerated lie, he has met with attacks from governments and secret service agents. This tracking led to isolation, punishment and attempts to silence him.
His books are criticized only due to the fact that they present the truth. The authorities are terrified of the fact that Dr. Coleman shares, resulting in widespread bans, lies and blockades.
Censorship and suppression of fact goes beyond himself and touches everyone. It is depressing that the ban on books and authors remains undetected and uncritical, says Dr. Coleman. This deficiency of concern is something that is hard for him to understand.
Author: Dr. Vernon Coleman
To say that I don't have much experience with social media is to say that I don't have much experience picnicting at the top of Mount Everest. erstwhile I was increasing up, there was no social media, and erstwhile I yet tried to set up a Facebook account in early 2020, I was told I was besides dangerous to access the platform. They thought I could corrupt the Facebook community with unwanted truths and provocative ideas. I was besides banned at LinkedIn. And I couldn't open an account on any social networking site. Worse still, anyone who tries to share my films and articles will most likely be banned.
For a while I had a YouTube account that grew to about 250,000 subscribers in a fewer months before they banned me for life – and, most likely out of spite, they besides banned me from access to anyone's YouTube channel. YouTube was clearly under the leadership of the CIA, and in the UK I always suspected that BBC workers were acting as YouTube observers – paying attention to everything that contained uncomfortable and thus unacceptable truth.
So I was a small confused erstwhile I heard in February 2024 that Google's manager said fake artificial intelligence was a serious threat to democracy. It occurred to me that executive power needs to look a small closer to home if it's worried about democracy. I think there is no uncertainty that Google and YouTube represent a far greater threat to democracy than artificial intelligence or artificial intelligence. The policy of censorship and exclusion, favored by the duplicate evils of Google and YouTube, has already done more harm to democracy than any another media manifestation in history.
Since 1988, erstwhile I first revealed that AIDS is simply a terrible and over-conscionable lie to intimidate and force me to obey, I am targeted by governments and secret service agents. If you have no experience of how the planet works these days, you might think I'm overreacting. Believe me, I'm not. The plan was always to isolate, punish and silence. As I explained in my book "Truth Teller: The Price", There is absolutely no freedom.
We are being restricted in many ways, and the freedom of the press is now simply historical, which nobody takes seriously. There is no freedom of speech. As far as I'm concerned, I might as well live in China. (Truly speaking, it is not entirely true. My publishers in China were ordered to halt selling all my books after I wrote a column on vaccinations for a well-selling Chinese newspaper.)
After I questioned the authoritative position on AIDS (for the record, everything I said was right, and everything he promoted the establishment turned out to be wrong), publishers refused me anything in common with my books, including books that sold in large quantities (my publisher in Germany sent me £30,000 royalties in 1 year and then threw out all my books and refused to proceed selling) and so I became a self-publisher.
At first, I ran my own publishing house, but it was based on message order sales, and since transportation prices increased rapidly, the exercise shortly became impossible, so I started selling my books on Amazon. For me, it was, and it's kind of like a vicar's egg. Amazon made at least 2 of my books about covid "inaccessible", and then the White home of American president Joe Biden became active in suppressing my books.
And then president Joe Biden's White home decided that it wanted Amazon to ban my book on vaccines – a book that is full of uncomfortable and thus unacceptable truths.
Titled "Anyone who says vaccines are safe and effective lies", my book on vaccines and vaccines was first published before covid fraud and is full of facts about universal vaccines. No 1 always questioned any of the facts in the book. Since the book was published on Amazon, it has frequently been the best-selling book on vaccines No. 1 in the world. And sold in tens of thousands of copies.
In distant times, before the media decided to censor doctors telling the truth, I frequently discussed the value of vaccines and vaccinations with pro-vaccinators. I've never lost a debate. The pro-vaccinators have dealt with this embarrassment by refusing to debate with me.
And then it turns out that a White home authoritative wrote to Amazon asking for "a simplification in the visibility" of my book. (There is besides evidence that White home officials have put force on social networks and YouTube. That most likely explains why they ban me everywhere. It seems the censorship was arranged from above.) The White home cited that I had published the book with my own summary. (This is frequently utilized as a way to discredit the book). And Biden's staff reported that "I condemned Covid-19 vaccines as a dangerous medical experiment" and that "I have confirmed that the doctors who administer them are guilty of war crimes."
"We gotta assemble a SWAT squad and prepare a briefing later this week," said 1 of Amazon's directors. Amazon's worker later reported that they included the option "Don't advance anti-vaccination books, the main nonsubjective of which is to convince readers that vaccines are dangerous or ineffective" and promised "to review additional options for handling these books".
And what precisely does the White home know about my book? I'm willing to bet they haven't read it.
What does the White home know about vaccines and vaccines?
I would love to discuss the contents of my book with president Biden or anyone from the White House.
But that's not how it works these days.
The Establishment does not debate, discuss or review information. The BBC in London has banned any fair discussion on vaccines and vaccines. They do not let anyone questioning vaccines to appear on their programs, "whether they are right or wrong."
The Establishment simply bans everything that it disapproves or finds frightening.
It's not just me. He touches everyone.
Books that contain immense errors or slanders can be easy banned, but my books are banned and suppressed, and I am blocked and lied to, simply due to the fact that they contain the truth. The authorities are terrified of the truths I share. (To learn more about how fact is suppressed, read my book "Truth Teller: The Price".)
Our freedom and our right to have and share opinions go back centuries. In the 17th century, John Lilburne, a pamphlectist was known as "Freeborn John' for standing up for his rights to say what he thought erstwhile he wanted, and to stay silent (to avoid self-incrimination erstwhile he wanted to stay silent). It was John Lilburne who gave us all the right to keep our dignity and privacy, no substance what you effort to force us to do. Lilburne was 1 of the driving forces for the improvement of English democracy.
Censors have always done their best to suppress unpopular opinions, and fact has always been considered a nuisance, especially erstwhile it is someway uncomfortable for the state machine.
In 1719, 18-year-old printer John Matthews was hanged—and then, just in case, drawn and quartered—for publishing 1,000 copies of the brochure that called for the overthrow of George I, which was unpopular and widely considered inept. Pamflet (who was the 18th-century equivalent of a blog) suggested allowing parliament to assist in the election of kings or in restoring the native British royal household (displaced in 1788 as a consequence of a coup). Matthews powerfully refused to uncover the identity of the author of the brochure, so they hanged him instead. Before he was hanged, the brave and insubordinate Matthews gave a thrilling speech from the sapphire.
But if free-thinking writers and publishers have a holy patron, then it should be Daniel Defoe, not brave and unfortunate Matthews.
In 1703, Defoe, then inactive a pamphlectist and journalist, not a celebrated writer, was arrested for subversive defamation and transported to Newgate prison. He was later placed under a bar for being dissident. In fact, he wrote a satirical pamphlet titled "The shortest way with dissidents"in which he pretended to be a tory, but led their views to extremes to mock them. The Establishment was not laughing and Defoe was arrested. Standing under the bar he wrote a poem titled "Hymn under the rod". The poem was sold and alternatively of being cast with rotten eggs and stinking fish, Defoe became a hero for a mob who did not like his views, but admired his courage – especially quarreling and feisty.
Defoe (who changed his name from Daniel Foe to Daniel Defoe due to the fact that he thought it sounded better) was furiously attacked by the establishment, but was the first truly heroic English writer. In the following years he wrote his "Journal of the year of the plague" (possibly hoping that no 1 would announcement that he was only 5 years old during the plague), and after riding around England he wrote "A journey across the island of large Britain". Under various aliases he wrote many pamphlets – first inexpensive books in a soft setting. Later, crushed by insults and criticism from the establishment, Defoe invented a fresh literary form and invented a fresh – imaginary biographies. His novels, including Robinson Crusoe, Moll Flanders and Roxana, have never met with the acclaim of critics, but have always been a large success among the people who read them.
It is widely believed present that those of us who live in the West live in free societies and enjoy the luxury of free press.
But we don't.
Honest words and truths, honor and dignity are what good people live. But now we live in a planet dominated by contemptible conspirators who bought and paid butlers working for contemptible organizations specified as YouTube and the BBC; Lokaje who consider honesty, truth, honor and dignity to be their sworn enemies and who spend all hr of work, doing everything in their power to suppress the fact and oppress society.
It is crucial to remember that anyone who can inactive post videos on YouTube is there due to the fact that the CIA wants to be heard. In another words, I don't think you should anticipate anyone from thousands of fact-based videos to share the fact about health, diseases, vaccines or anything else. I'm afraid they're more likely to study what the conspirators want to hear.
In my book."Truth Teller: The Price"; I explained how I was expelled from the Royal Society of Fine Arts for the peculiar contemporary crime of telling the truth. I guess another associate of the company (I fishy individual from the BBC) complained that they disagree that I'm telling the fact about covid and another matters. A society that clearly disapproves of freedom of speech has acknowledged the complainant's right and thrown me out. Would they dare to throw me out if I was Jewish, black, or both? In my heart, I fishy not. And if this suspicion is right, they are guilty of reversed anti-Semitism or racism, or possibly even both.
Incidentally, whenever I think of the BBC, I am reminded of Kenneth Tynan's remark that "every weakness corrupts, and the absolute weakness corrupts absolutely."
I should get utilized to it by now. I have been censored since the 1980s erstwhile I published unpopular political truths about the threat of AIDS. (Governments and medical institutions claimed that by 2000, we would all be affected by AIDS. I said they're wrong.)
Today the censors are watching everything we do. Friend
from Germany made 1 of my films available through his social media channel. Shortly thereafter, he received an authoritative warning. I uncertainty he'll be watching more of my movies.
Never before has our freedom been in specified mortal danger.
We ignore informing signs at our own risk.
Today we return to the times before Lilburne. The freedoms he and others have won for us have been suppressed. And almost no 1 took the level to defend those lost freedoms. And surely no politician and no 1 in mainstream media had the courage to say a word about what was going on. To my absolute amazement, I was expelled from the Royal Society of Fine Arts due to the fact that I was telling truths that did not delight another members. They did not like that I had views they did not share, and they did not like that I shared my views (based on, remember, on technological evidence) with another people. I find that alternatively frightening.
As an author whose many books have been completely banned (only due to the fact that the establishment wanted to suppress the truths contained in them), I see no difference between banning the book and burning it.
No, in fact the ban on publication is worse than burning it, due to the fact that the book cannot be burned until it is published. To burn the book, it had to be published and there is simply a good chance that any of the printed books avoided the fire. If the book is completely suppressed (as it happened to me), there are no copies to burn or read.
Nobody seems to care about the ban on books and authors. I don't get it.
About the Author
Vernon Coleman Dr hab. inż. MB ChB practiced medicine for 10 years. From over 30 years is simply a full-time professional author. He is simply a novelist and author conducting campaigns, wrote many non-fiction books. He wrote over 100 bookswhich have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, www.vernoncoleman.com, there are hundreds of articles that you can read for free.
Translated by the translator \Google
source:https://expose-news.com/
