Last debate before the election. Summary of key statements

angora24.pl 2 months ago

Stanowski's connection to TVP journalist

At the very beginning of the debate, Krzysztof Stanowski accused Dorota Wysocka-Schnepf, a TVP journalist, of being “the archicaplan of propaganda” and recalled the controversy surrounding her function as 1 of the co-leaders. Many of the polling stations demanded her control to another TVP journalist.

This is not the first time in past erstwhile a individual named Schnepf questions Poles. I hope we all get out of here safe and sound. But it is simply a good thing that you are here, due to the fact that you are a real symbol of what happens to Polish media, what utilized to happen and what continues to happen. That it's not clean water, it's just the same sewer as it was before. That the president of TVP is present a man who was with Rafal Trzaskowski, in a bus company, he managed that your husband was waiting for an ambassadorial appointment from the fresh president, we guess which – Stanowski assessed.

A fewer minutes later, the writer decided to answer Stanowski:

In addition to Mr Stanowski's statement, I will quote prof. Bartoszewski, who said that erstwhile a drunk vomits on our bus, it is not an insult, but something unpleasant. Not everyone can insult me.

However, it did not halt there due to the fact that Krzysztof Stanowski, on the next occasion, stated that Wysocka-Shnepf was only in the studio to “watch the clock” and this is its only competence.

Trzaskowski, Nawrocks and the mysterious envelope

As 1 could guess, 2 candidates representing the biggest parties in Poland were mainly attacking each other.

Recent days have shown that 1 of the candidates should consider whether he has a moral right to search the highest office in the Republic of Poland – said Trzaskowski, referring to the affair involving Nawrocki, connected with the flat of Mr Jerzy.

Trzaskowski returned to this subject respective more times. Holownia besides accused Nawrocki of cheating on the acquisition of a municipal apartment, claiming that he had benefited from an undue discount. He threatened Nawrock with a lawsuit.

Nawrocki scored the ball, quoting the situation of many years ago, which afraid alleged "housekeepers".

You don't have the honour to talk on housing issues. You were the chief of staff of Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz and you are co-responsible for the reprivatisation scandal in Warsaw – dropped the PiS candidate.

At the end of the presidential debate, Rafał Trzaskowski handed out an envelope to Karol Nawrock, saying that “this is the last chance to behave honestly.” After the debate, Trzaskowski did not uncover the contents of the envelope to journalists, stating that it was Karol Nawrocki who should explain its content himself.

Subject of abortion

Rafał Trzaskowski, a candidate for the Civic Coalition, pointed out the request to change the abortion rules immediately and supply parents with free access to nursery, kindergarten, schools and housing for young people. Simon Holovnia of the 3rd Way, on the another hand, said that abortion should be resolved in a referendum. In turn, Karol Nawrocki, supported by the Law and Justice, pointed out the problem of promoting “anti-value” alternatively of pro-family values, which negatively affects demography, and advocated supporting ideas that favour the establishment of families.

Adrian Zandberg of the organization Together advocated women's right to abortion until the 12th week of pregnancy, and Magdalena Biejat of fresh Left stressed that access to abortion is crucial erstwhile deciding on maternity.

Journalist Krzysztof Stanowski criticized politicians for creating a state that cannot supply aid to children, forcing parents to publically ask for support. During his speech, he wore a shirt calling for aid to a sick child.

Mentzen and Braun maintained their positions, stating that abortion was a homicide. Mentzen added that raising children is simply a origin of joy for women.

Left hits left

During the debate there was a tension between left-wing candidates. During the debate, Adrian Zandberg criticised Magdalena Biejat for supporting a budget that he felt did not supply adequate wellness care resources, which could consequence in an extension of queues and worsening of patients' situation. Zandberg accused the Left that tiny initiatives had become a precedence alternatively of saving the wellness system.

In response, Magdalena Biejat defended her attitude, claiming that she did not avoid making promises and acting in the coalition to implement the announced solutions. She stressed that wellness issues were besides a precedence for her and that her group would present a wellness backing plan that would warrant the safety of citizens.

Zandberg did not hide his surprise by saying that the fresh Left could stand up to the current coalition, as without it she would have no majority.

Props

The envelope handed over to Nawrock was not the only prop utilized in the debate. Despite the ban on bringing them to the studio, Krzysztof Stanowski appeared with respective flags, offering to lend them to rivals. Economist Artur Bartoszewicz decided to take the white-red flag.

Poi gadget besides reached Marek Woch. During his final speech, he removed the key to point out that he erstwhile worked as a plumber.

Read Entire Article