OMZRiK submits a notice
In consequence to a message by an organization fighting xenophobia, the writer published any controversial comments. In inviting Grzegorz Braun to her “studio”, Monika Jaruzelska had to realize that the very presence of this controversial MP would attract many viewers to her programme.
However, 1 might wonder if Jaruzelska expected the conversation to lead to a notification to the prosecution by the Monitoring Centre for Racist and Xenophobic Behavioral Behaviours. This organization considered that there should be no place to advance certain extremist views in the Polish public space. According to her, this category includes statements by Mr Braun, who does not hide his anti-Semitism.
One of the topics raised during the interview was the extinguishing of Khanuk candles. This event has caused quite a few controversy, many online revisions have happened, but – most importantly for Braun – it has caused the policy to face severe punishment for his wrongdoing. During the show, Braun explained:
The question of what conclusions will be drawn from this by a wide, patriotic audience, erstwhile it becomes so apparent that it is simply a unified Khanukov front versus us, average Poles, who – attention – want a very simple program to be implemented (...), “that Poland be Polish”.
How can we read on the organization's Facebook account in mention to Braun's case:
Jaruzelska answers
However, it seems that possible problems with the prosecution appear to be insignificant to Jaruzelska. She replied to the message “The Monitoring Centre” with a short line:
A Pole celebrates The rat gets it.
In her later entries, the writer admitted that she had previously meant a different version of “answers”.
I made it up this morning. The first version was: alternatively of celebrating, come denunciate. I think the rat one's better. Thank you for your appreciation and greetings on Christmas:
One of the net users noticed that Jaruzelska's actions seem to be at least unusual and even devoid of logic. However, the writer herself does not see any inconsistency here. The Internetnaut wonders whether Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski, the journalist's father, would support the fact that his daughter invites a individual to her home who would “hang him together with gays, Jews and women who would dare to argue the patriarchy.”
The writer only wrote laconically that yes, she would surely support her action.
Views or a show for the public?
Monika Jaruzelska's online activity was already controversial. Of course, the format of the program, to which controversial people are invited, is nothing new, but even then better selection of guests is possible. Controversy can be both leftist and rightist, but the others prevail in Jaruzelska.
On May 9, 2018, Leszek Miller, Monika Jaruzelska, Romuald Koperski and Piotr Radtke appeared in the Russian embassy. pic.twitter.com/po1Aznrjyj
— Lostson #WeAreNATO #WantBycwNATO #ZostawnaTO (@lostson_) May 23, 2018
In 2020, Monika Jaruzelska was included in the “Brunat Book” of the Association “Never More” which monitors the actions of the far right in Poland since 1996. This was due to an interview on his YouTube channel with... Grzegorz Braun.
The creators of the “Brunat Book” criticized Jaruzelska for the deficiency of consequence to the hateful content given by Braun and even welcoming them. Prof. Rafał Pankowski noted that Jaruzelska had definitely turned to the extremist right, inviting another right-wing commentators to her programme. The writer defended herself by claiming that her program was to present a variety of views.
Is that true? It's hard to tell. In her program she hosted quite a few people with extremist right-wing and anti-Semitic views. Sebastian Pitonia, Rafał Ziemkiewicz or Wojciech Olszański should be mentioned. On the another hand, there were people from a somewhat different communicative specified as Maja Stasko or Simon Holovnia.
In my opinion, although of course it is impossible to hide that Monika Jaruzelska likes to pose for pictures with people with Russian connotations, her program is inactive based on displays. People with a immense extreme, specified as Grzegorz Braun, attract the attention of the audience. So why invitation individual "normal" and not besides shocking erstwhile you can invitation a guy who is certain to spin the appropriate view statistics?
I sincerely uncertainty that Jaruzelski's application to the D.A.'s office will be taken seriously.
