The ultimate Chamber of Control indicated that the IPN did not arrive at PLN 55,2 1000 in fees for the guest area utilized by Karol Nawrocki erstwhile he headed the Institute. To the right is an uncomfortable but essential lesson: institutions of national memory must besides be strong by transparency and discipline in spending taxpayers' money.
Budgetary control and old peace account
The ultimate Chamber of Control published a speech after the audit of the implementation of the state budget in 2025 in the section on the Institute of National Memory. The paper is not a political flyer. It is the authoritative control of the institution held from the money of Poles. That is why the substance requires a calm but hard response.
As shown by ANC, IPN has not charged rent fees, including for media, for the guest area made available to the president of the Institute since October 2022. The amount indicated by the controllers is PLN 55.2 thousand. NIK assessed that this was contrary to the principles of the management of public funds set out in Article 44 of the Public Finance Act.
It's not a multimillion dollar affair. But in a country that takes its institutions seriously, 55 1000 PLN is besides important. due to the fact that the bigger question behind this amount is: does the institution appointed to defender national memory itself observe the rules that apply to all citizen?
IPN explains the customized and nature of the President's work
The IPN management did not accept the charges unanswered. The first deputy president of the Institute explained to NIK that the president of the IPN, like erstwhile ones, was not charged with the costs of utilizing the guest room. According to this argument, it was a tool needed to carry out duties: unstandardized working time, typical nature of functions, frequent tasks from morning to late night.
That argument is understandable. State offices have functions which cannot be closed in office hours from 8 to 16. The problem begins where customized replaces a clear basis and equal rules. If 1 of the employees paid for the usage of the premises and the president did not, the audit is entitled to ask the basis for specified a difference.
In right-wing thinking, the state is not a private farm of any crew. Ours, too. A strong national state is not created by indulgence for its own, but by the rule that the common good is taken seriously.
National memory cannot be a shield before control
IPN remains 1 of the most crucial institutions of the 3rd Republic in the area of historical memory. These are archives, investigations, research, education, searching for victims of communism and reminding those who have been trying to remove from Polish past for decades. Therefore, the dispute over his budget should not be a fuel for those who would most willingly weaken the full Institute.
In fresh days, the National diary has besides written that Karol Nawrocki wants to change the model of presidency. All the more reason for any allegation concerning the duration of its management of the IPN will be utilized politically. However, the right should not correspond to the automatic closing of the eyes. The answer must be document, procedure and order.
NIK besides recalled that any of the conclusions of the erstwhile audit stay valid. The study mentions, among others, the organization of IPN and the fees for the guest room. This is the essence of the matter: the controllers not only described the old problem, but pointed out that it was not closed in a way that would close the subject.
The taxpayer's money requires national discipline
The NIK budget speech besides gives a broader image of finances. The IPN's expenditure plan after the changes amounted to PLN 592 752.9 thousand, and the execution of expenditure in part 13 reached PLN 585 445.6 thousand. It's serious money. all buck must work for archives, memory, education and historical truth, not for recognition.
It is not about joining the choir of those who see an obstacle in the IPN, due to the fact that they are disturbed by Polish memory. It's the exact opposite. An institution so crucial to you should be immune to allegations, due to the fact that the credibility of Polish historical policy besides depends on its credibility.
The dispute over the election of the fresh president showed that the IPN remained a field of fierce political struggle. We wrote about it on the occasion of the decision erstwhile The legislature rejected Matthew Szpytma. specified an institution must not give the opponents easy ammunition. If procedures are unclear, they must be arranged. If the receivables were wrongly charged, this must be settled.
The right must besides require its own institutions
The worst consequence present would be to bring the case to a simple tribal reflex. any will want to hit Nawrocki and through him into the full memory policy. Others will say that if our opponents are attacking, there is no subject. Both roads are weak.
National realism requires another answer. The IPN must be defended against ideological abolition and against leftist aversion to Polish history. At the same time, he must be required to account for, discipline and standards that do not exposure the state to embarrassment.
Poles pay taxes not to finance procedural chaos. They pay due to the fact that the state is to defend their security, memory and national continuity. If the memory institution is to be the shield of truth, it itself must have clear and clear rules.
Source: ultimate Chamber of Control, WP News, Republic of Poland.
Source: WP News
