Do you know why there's no discussion on the Internet, but there's shuffling and shuffling?
I put the thesis, based on reflection of "discussion" in s24 or Improprietary, that there was a complete irrationalism generated by liberalism, which rejected the criterion of truth, and now repel the soul, hell is gone. By the way, it is worth noting that an individual, in this case, commentator or blogger, is, in specified a situation, acting on his own, completely helpless and doomed, if he does not control himself strongly, to plaiting nonsense. The story of an all-powerful, rational individual has fallen.
And by the way, I've got cases that are a typical illustration of net flaws.
How does this defect manifest itself?
If we send 1 fool, it won't work. It'll be the same erstwhile we fly the another fool. But erstwhile we get the same task together, the consequence won't be as stupid as it would seem at first. erstwhile we print something on the Internet, we unwittingly enter individual mode and become a fool.
The portal serves, theoretically, the exchange of information. The essential criterion is the veracity of this information. So the author must, in the end, appeal to science, without learning is only ble, ble, ble. This is our model of Western, Christian civilization, and whoever does not respect its principles will end up in a dumpster of history.
Most commentators, infected with liberalism, have these criteria in their nose. They either have no thought of real reality and feed on media stereotypes that are saturated with liberal media mush, or trust on outdated cognition a fewer decades ago. And their frustrations are online.
Instead of a discussion, alternatively of a substantive consequence to allegations, any commentators respond with aggression and epithets. Holy cows?
Guys, start reading so that it's not Harlekin. Our civilization is simply a civilization of words.
When individuals act individually, the consequence can be predicted erstwhile they act in a group, the dynamics of the interaction makes the consequence unpredictable. This phenomenon is based on cooperation and the evolution of cooperation in the human species.
Until recently, decision-making processes were out of control due to the deficiency of investigation tools, but now we have powerful computers, we have game theory, we have models and simulations, and we can survey long sequences and their results and analyse the different strategies and factors that influence.
,It's the influence 1 individual has on another: the effect of interaction (interaction). 1 of the features of collective behaviour that emerges from local interactions is that it is impossible to deduce the global state of the arrangement on the basis of the characteristics of its individual components. This is the most crucial message of physical sciences to social sciences: do not succumb to the easy temptation to conclude from the psychology of the individual about the behaviour of the group.
♪ ... ♪
But now we can begin to research how, through the common influences of individual decisions and interpersonal interactions, specified standards arise and change. We can begin to realize how society creates its leaders, its customs, fashion and problems thanks to a large mass of interdependent decisions."
(Phillip Ball ,, Critical Mass" p. 382)
