Nawrocki did it again. Another learned speech and escape from the media

It has not been long since the fresh president was sworn in, but Karol Nawrocki seems to have developed a very convenient way for himself and, in total, a mediocre way of communicating with the media. His last press conference, during which he announced that he had written 5 laws and vetoed three, fits into this model: speech and retreat before a wave of questions.


Karol Nawrocki said what he had to say, did a fewer studied gestures, troubled mines, and left. He was not going to answer any questions from journalists. announcement that this is precisely what his erstwhile conference looked like, during which he proclaimed his veto and acceptance.

A lot of people say Nawrocks have been speaking like a pulpit priest lately. He proclaims his truths and avoids any (not necessarily hostile) confrontation. In fact, just send an operator with a camera and a microphone to this kind of event. If you can't ask questions, you don't request more people.

Notice and Tactical Retreat

He went out in front of Zbigniew Bogucki and Paweł Sziernaker. 2 of his colleagues were not completely needed there, they did not have any role. Standing, smiling, making dangerous faces. It was only after Nawrocki's speech that they went out to journalists and explained what their boss meant.

However, questions arise as to why Karol Nawrocki decided to deal with the media in this way. Or possibly not so much with the media as with questions coming up. Even during the last fewer conferences, after which he failed to avoid cameras, it was clear that the fresh president was struggling to control his emotions. He can "fire" and from a polite erudite, speaking full sentences, in a flash he turns into a man with a unusual sight asking a silent question "Have you got a problem?"

Perhaps it is precisely hard to master the emotions of Karol Nawrocki that are the reason why he "announces" and leaves. It is only after a while that his close associates leave for journalists and effort to explain what their boss meant.

It should besides be noted – on the plus side – that the president's co-workers are now active media, saying colloquially "walk on the media" and questions alternatively (as opposed to their boss) do not avoid.

This is, however, to the detriment of citizens who do not have a full image of the situation and do not know what the president truly thinks. They only know a part of the pompous speech of reality and its studied speeches.