Murder of a 9-month-old Felk in a infirmary in Oleśnica

A dramatic event occurred in the infirmary in Oleśnica, which raises serious questions about the ethics of modern medicine and the work of the medical community. A 9-month-old boy, Felek, ready to be born, was killed by the injection of potassium chloride into the heart. another facilities offered termination of pregnancy through imperial cutting and giving specialist assistance to the newborn.

According to the Foundation, Felk's parent – Mrs Anita – first went to a infirmary in Łódź, where the medical squad planned to end the pregnancy by means of imperial cutting. The goal was not only to defend the wellness of the woman, but besides to save the child, who in the 37th week of pregnancy was full developed and able to live outside the mother's body.

Prof. Piotr Sieroszewski, Head of the Gynecology Clinic in Łódź and president of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, confirmed in a peculiar message that the medical squad wanted to save the lives of both patients:

"We have proposed an immediate solution by Caesaric cutting (due to Mrs. Anita's mediocre intellectual condition) in general anesthesia, with the kid receiving highly specialized paediatric treatment. (...) We have followed the laws in force which do not licence the killing of the fetus during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy."

However, as media sources report, under the influence of the board of representatives of the proabortion foundation, the female decided to decision to the infirmary in Oleśnica. This is where, as the “Gazeta Wyborcza” says, the deputy manager of the facility, Dr. Gizela Jagielska, was to execute the procedure of killing the kid by injecting potassium chloride straight into the heart. This is an unequivocal act of killing a kid capable of living. The suspicion of congenital bone fractures cannot be an excuse for taking a child's life. Especially since the kid was close to birth and could be treated after birth. In return, death was chosen.

This dramatic event reveals a wider problem: the increasingly bold, yet brutal, activity of abortion-promoting environments as a solution to “problems” of pregnancy. Felek was not a clump of cells or "uterine content". He was a kid who needed chance and care – not death.

In the infirmary in Oleśnica, the most drastic abortion methods have been utilized for years. In the case of younger children, in the early stages of development, the alleged vacuum method is utilized – consisting in mechanical tearing of the child's body with a suction machine. For older children, specified as Felek, you inject poison straight into the heart. All of this takes place under the cloak of legality, with the approval of a strategy that increasingly turns its eyes off the suffering of the most vulnerable.

The fight for life continues – besides in the streets. Pro-life volunteers, who constantly organize pickets and prayers under the infirmary in Oleśnica, were frequently victims of assault and aggression. Local authorities take action to block protests – they dissolve legal gatherings, confiscate banners revealing the fact about abortion and impose severe financial penalties on organizers.

In Felk, congenital bone fractures were suspected – a hard condition, but absolutely not excluding life. This illness is being treated. It requires peculiar care, not murder. Children and adults with osteogenesis imperfecta live in Poland and the world, surrounded by love and aid of doctors. Meanwhile, in Oleśnica no treatment effort was made – the decision to die was made. A decision that can no longer be revoked.

Felk's death is not just an unimaginable tragedy for 1 family. This is simply a painful sign of our times – proof of what the ideology leads to, which, under the cloak of "freedom of choice" takes the voice and life of the most vulnerable. Felek was ready to be born. He was waiting for his first breath. He may have lived—but he was not allowed. He was killed by a decision made under force from abortion propaganda. It was the environments that represent themselves as "women's defenders" that pushed the parent toward an irreversible tragedy.

jb
Source: Pro-Life Foundation