Dark Areas Beyond Normality 2 / Branimir

Dark Terenes Beyond Normality 2
They're morons or mean bastards. Alcoma in MPs? We all know that they are not allowed to do specified things – even in spite of what this fellow associate of the Confederation has been doing recently. due to the fact that these tools are easy to usage to discredit individual uncomfortable. due to the fact that a breathalyst test - contrary to the apparent ease of usage of specified equipment - is not simple and carries a hazard of serious errors. Despite method advancement in this area. but the dignity of the subject. And the request to change the law. But...
We can afford it due to the fact that we are paying for it, although it would be appropriate to finance specified changes from parliamentary allowances alternatively than from our taxes. But even if they don't, we can inactive afford it, due to the fact that it's an investment. The company I work in late installed specified an entrance gate – this is the cheaper version – in which a random, computer-selected individual is subjected to a breathalyst. A more costly version of this solution checks everyone and we can afford it – as taxpayers – to let only the sober into the plenary room.
You may not see it, but the law in our country invents and approves drunk and high. That's why it is. Right? Then show me the investigation that shows they were sober at the time of the vote. A goal like that would explain it. What's wrong? – you don't come in and vote. And in specified an institution, I hope, these equipment would be decently subject to method review. due to the fact that I myself was erstwhile in a situation erstwhile a breathalyzer on the gate after the deadline - approval? - showed unusual things, and another breathalyst spoke differently.
Alcomate is not a part of equipment that will show you the fact after reading the manual. This is simply a maintenance device that requires training in operation. Like a police ‘dryer’ – those who know how to confuse the result.

And it was only this incidental with the associate that made Simon think that something was wrong. But this is just the beginning of the subject, its apex, due to the fact that alcohol first comes under your eyes. He's media. What if specified an MP is sick and is taking thinking-changing medicines? You've had the flu erstwhile and you've started fighting it, and life demands crucial decisions, clear thinking, so half the poorness if those decisions are only about your life. What if you're going to vote like this on the introduction of cadastral tax? I mean, he's sober, but is there any clarity here? due to the fact that you get a medical leave from a doctor, a lawyer, an entrepreneur, but as an MP, too? The doctor gives you a release, but does he prohibit you? The flu has its own time...
And possibly not a breathalyst for Members, but direct democracy and the procedure for recalling specified a associate by voters after specified a bobolus? Not staying on the parliamentary bench for 4 years? The introduction of direct democracy on respective occasions, that is to say, the dismissal of Members following behaviours incompatible with pre-election declarations has resulted in only a fewer appeals. I heard about 2 MPs during the alleged Paris Commune. erstwhile you have specified a thing behind you – that voters can cancel you – it does not work like that, a associate like that does.

Well? Will this Member's vote be verified? These laws have been approved, implemented. Was he sober then?